Secondary spectral components of substrate-borne vibrational signals affect male preference

Animal sexual signals contain information about both compatibility and quality of the signaller, but combined with influence of the signalling medium, the complexity of mate selection makes it difficult to separate different components of this process. We approached the problem of teasing apart different functions of sexual signals by using the planthopper Hyalesthes obsoletus, which uses unimodal vibrational communication, as a model. Vibrational signals are known to encode information about identity in their temporal pattern, while a useful cue for quality may reside in their spectral properties. In this study, we demonstrate a connection between spectral properties and attractiveness of female signals based on male behavioural response to signal playback. Artificially increasing the amplitude of high-frequency components increases signal attractiveness and vice versa, which indicates that spectral properties could function as an index of quality. Presence of high-frequency spectral components might indicate a larger or healthier individual, but direct connection with female fitness is not yet clear. In addition, we found that H. obsoletus males are able to exploit female pulses as directional cues and can discriminate between female signals of different attractiveness coming from spatially separated sources.

[1]  M. Virant-Doberlet,et al.  Mating Behavior of Hyalesthes obsoletus (Hemiptera: Cixiidae) , 2010 .

[2]  Jernej Polajnar,et al.  Resonance in herbaceous plant stems as a factor in vibrational communication of pentatomid bugs (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[3]  M. Virant-Doberlet,et al.  Active Space and the Role of Amplitude in Plant-Borne Vibrational Communication , 2014 .

[4]  M. Gillham Variation in acoustic signals within and among leafhopper species of the genus Alebra (Homoptera, Cicadellidae) , 1992 .

[5]  Rufus A Johnstone,et al.  Managing uncertainty: information and insurance under the risk of starvation. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[6]  R. E. Hunt,et al.  Roles of interplant movement, acoustic communication, and phototaxis in mate-location behavior of the leafhopper Graminella nigrifrons , 1991, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  O. Seehausen,et al.  Ecology, sexual selection and speciation. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[8]  T. Chapman,et al.  The evolution and significance of male mate choice. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  F. Legendre,et al.  Competitive masking of vibrational signals during mate searching in a treehopper , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  R. Cocroft,et al.  Host shifts favor vibrational signal divergence in Enchenopa binotata treehoppers , 2008 .

[11]  R. L. Rodríguez,et al.  Insect mating signal and mate preference phenotypes covary among host plant genotypes , 2015, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  R. Bonduriansky The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence , 2001, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[13]  P. Kehrli,et al.  Host plant preferences of Hyalesthes obsoletus, the vector of the grapevine yellows disease ‘bois noir’, in Switzerland , 2011 .

[14]  T. A. Ryan,et al.  Significance tests for multiple comparison of proportions, variances, and other statistics. , 1960, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  M. Breed Animal Signals.Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution.ByJohn Maynard Smithand, David Harper.Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. $99.50 (hardcover); $44.50 (paper). ix + 166 p; ill.; index. ISBN: 0–19–852684–9 (hc); 0–19–852685–7 (pb). 2003. , 2005 .

[16]  M. Claridge ACOUSTIC SIGNALS IN THE HOMOPTERA: Behavior, Taxonomy, and Evolution , 1985 .

[17]  B. Cocroft,et al.  Host Shifts , the Evolution of Communication , and Speciation in the Enchenopa binotata Species Complex of Treehoppers , 2007 .

[18]  B. Oldfield,et al.  Accuracy of orientation in female crickets,Teleogryllus oceanicus (Gryllidae): dependence on song spectrum , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[19]  D. Y. Tishechkin New data on vibratory communication in jumping plant lice of the families Aphalaridae and Triozidae (Homoptera, Psyllinea) , 2007, Entomological Review.

[20]  Axel Michelsen,et al.  Plants as transmission channels for insect vibrational songs , 1982, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[21]  Sasha R. X. Dall,et al.  The ecology of information: an overview on the ecological significance of making informed decisions , 2010 .

[22]  Peggy S. M. Hill,et al.  How do animals use substrate-borne vibrations as an information source? , 2009, Naturwissenschaften.

[23]  T. Mendelson,et al.  The (mis)concept of species recognition. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  J. Bro-Jørgensen Dynamics of multiple signalling systems: animal communication in a world in flux. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  J. Haavie,et al.  Sexual Signals and Speciation : A Study of the Pied and Collared Flycatcher , 2004 .

[26]  M. Virant-Doberlet,et al.  The process of pair formation mediated by substrate-borne vibrations in a small insect , 2014, Behavioural Processes.

[27]  Meta Virant-Doberlet,et al.  Communication with substrate-borne signals in small plant-dwelling insects. , 2003, Annual review of entomology.

[28]  Valerio Mazzoni,et al.  Vibrational Communication Networks: Eavesdropping and Biotic Noise , 2014 .