Testing the Stochasticity of Patterns of Organismal Diversity: An Improved Null Model

Evolutionary biologists, systematists, and paleontologists commonly have invoked deterministic explanations for certain patterns of diversity. However, few authors have considered the null model that the factors generating diversity may behave stochastically and that "pattern" therefore results from chance and does not require a deterministic explanation. We have developed a quantitative null model based on a randomly branching Markovian process to test the stochasticity of patterns of diversity as represented by phylogenies of contemporary organisms. The model allows one to consider real phylogenies containing large numbers of taxa and to determine whether the observed topology of those phylogenies might be explained by chance alone. We believe that our null model represents an improvement over earlier models. The simplicity of our null model makes feasible the testing of large numbers of phylogenies for stochasticity.

[1]  Stephen Jay Gould,et al.  Stochastic Models of Phylogeny and the Evolution of Diversity , 1973, The Journal of Geology.

[2]  D. Rosen.  Vicariant Patterns and Historical Explanation in Biogeography , 1978 .

[3]  J. H. M. Wedderburn.  The Functional Equation g(x 2 ) = 2 αx + [g(x)] 2 , 1922 .

[4]  S. Anderson.  Patterns of Faunal Evolution , 1974, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[5]  Joseph Felsenstein,et al.  The number of evolutionary trees , 1978 .

[6]  L. V. Valen,et al.  A new evolutionary law , 1973 .

[7]  A. Schwartz,et al.  A guide to the identification of the amphibians and reptiles of the West Indies (exclusive of Hispaniola). , 1986 .

[8]  Stephen Jay Gould,et al.  The shape of evolution: a comparison of real and random clades , 1977, Paleobiology.

[9]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  CALCULATING PROBABILITIES THAT CLADOGRAMS MATCH: A METHOD OF BIOGEOGRAPHICAL INFERENCE , 1987 .

[10]  C. Guyer,et al.  Oadistic relationships among anoles (Sauria: Iguanidae) , 1986 .

[11]  J. Sepkoski.  Is the periodicity of extinctions a taxonomic artefact? , 1987, Nature.

[12]  Stephen Jay Gould,et al.  Stochastic Simulation and Evolution of Morphology-Towards a Nomothetic Paleontology , 1974 .

[13]  R. Bambach,et al.  The evolutionary bootstrap: a new approach to the study of taxonomic diversity , 1986, Paleobiology.

[14]  E. Harding.  The probabilities of rooted tree-shapes generated by random bifurcation , 1971, Advances in Applied Probability.

[15]  H. M. Savage.  The shape of evolution: systematic tree topology , 1983 .

[16]  J. Cracraft.  Pattern and process in paleobiology: the role of cladistic analysis in systematic paleontology , 1981, Paleobiology.

[17]  Earl D. McCoy,et al.  There Have Been No Statistical Tests of Cladistic Biogeographical Hypotheses , 1981 .

[18]  Thomas J. M. Schopf,et al.  Evolving paleontological views on deterministic and stochastic approaches , 1979, Paleobiology.

[19]  David M. Raup,et al.  Variation between groups in evolutionary rates: a statistical test of significance , 1980, Paleobiology.

[20]  Alan F. Karr,et al.  Natural clades differ from “random” clades: simulations and analyses , 1981, Paleobiology.