In this article we deal with how large chemical corporations perceive and handle threats and opportunities deriving from environmental problems. We suggest that coalitions or networks are a useful way to analyse the dynamics of the links between separate aspects of the business. A differentation is made between production, innovation and strategy networks. Networks transcend firm boundaries and an analytical distinction is made between networks that remain inside and those external to the corporation. We concentrate on strategy formulation and implementation and on the role of intra-organizational structures. In a pilot study, we interviewed key persons in five chemical companies in the USA and in The Netherland. Conclusions are that firms increasingly adjust their strategies, that this leads to organizational changes; and that environmental, safety and health (ESH) units play some role in this strategy reformulation by becoming part of networks inside the corporation. Some suggestions for further researc...
[1]
M. Callon.
Struggles and Negotiations to Define What is Problematic and What is Not
,
1980
.
[2]
J. Logsdon,et al.
Organizational responses to environmental issues : oil refining companies and air pollution
,
1983
.
[3]
R. Byers.
Managing environmental issues and impacts of emerging technology
,
1986
.
[4]
M. Baram.
Chemical Industry Hazards: Liability, Insurance, and the Role of Risk Analysis
,
1987
.
[5]
Philip J. Vergragt.
The Social Shaping of Industrial Innovations
,
1988
.
[6]
Steven C. Rice.
Environmental review strategy for R&D activities
,
1988
.
[7]
S. Rice.
Environmental considerations associated with experimental units1
,
1988
.
[8]
A. Irwin,et al.
Re-thinging the relationship between enviromental regulation and industrial innovation: The social negotiation of technical change
,
1989
.