Evaluation of root water uptake in the ISBA-A-gs land surface model using agricultural yield statistics over France

The simulation of root water uptake in land surface models is affected by large uncertainties. The difficulty in mapping soil depth and in describing the capacity of plants to develop a rooting system is a major obstacle to the simulation of the terrestrial water cycle and to the representation of the impacts of drought. In this study, long time series of agricultural statistics are used to evaluate and constrain root water uptake models. The inter-annual variability of cereal grain yield and permanent grassland dry matter yield is simulated over France by the Interactions between Soil, Biosphere and Atmosphere, CO 2 -reactive (ISBA-A-gs) generic land surface model (LSM). The two soil profile schemes available in the model are used to simulate the above-ground biomass ( B ag ) of cereals and grasslands: a two-layer force–restore (FR-2L) bulk reservoir model and a multi-layer diffusion (DIF) model. The DIF model is implemented with or without deep soil layers below the root zone. The evaluation of the various root water uptake models is achieved by using the French agricultural statistics of Agreste over the 1994–2010 period at 45 cropland and 48 grassland departements, for a range of rooting depths. The number of departements where the simulated annual maximum B ag presents a significant correlation with the yield observations is used as a metric to benchmark the root water uptake models. Significant correlations ( p value < 0.01) are found for up to 29 and 77% of the departements for cereals and grasslands, respectively. A rather neutral impact of the most refined versions of the model is found with respect to the simplified soil hydrology scheme. This shows that efforts should be made in future studies to reduce other sources of uncertainty, e.g. by using a more detailed soil and root density profile description together with satellite vegetation products. It is found that modelling additional subroot-zone base flow soil layers does not improve (and may even degrade) the representation of the inter-annual variability of the vegetation above-ground biomass. These results are particularly robust for grasslands, as calibrated simulations are able to represent the extreme 2003 and 2007 years corresponding to unfavourable and favourable fodder production, respectively.

[1]  C. Jacobs,et al.  Stomatal behaviour and photosynthetic rate of unstressed grapevines in semi-arid conditions , 1996 .

[2]  Fabienne Maignan,et al.  Modelling LAI, surface water and carbon fluxes at high-resolution over France: comparison of ISBA-A-gs and ORCHIDEE. , 2011 .

[3]  Dominique Carrer,et al.  Verification of the new ECMWF ERA-Interim reanalysis over France , 2010 .

[4]  David Gouache,et al.  Why are wheat yields stagnating in Europe? A comprehensive data analysis for France , 2010 .

[5]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes , 1996, Oecologia.

[6]  Jean-Louis Roujean,et al.  Ability of the land surface model ISBA‐A‐gs to simulate leaf area index at the global scale: Comparison with satellites products , 2006 .

[7]  Jean-Christophe Calvet,et al.  Modelling CO2-enrichment effects using an interactive vegetation SVAT scheme , 2001 .

[8]  Joost C. B. Hoedjes,et al.  SMOSREX: A long term field campaign experiment for soil moisture and land surface processes remote sensing , 2006 .

[9]  Alina Barbu,et al.  The SURFEXv7.2 land and ocean surface platform for coupled or offline simulation of earth surface variables and fluxes , 2012 .

[10]  W. J. Shuttleworth,et al.  Creation of the WATCH Forcing Data and Its Use to Assess Global and Regional Reference Crop Evaporation over Land during the Twentieth Century , 2011 .

[11]  Bertrand Decharme,et al.  Reconciling soil thermal and hydrological lower boundary conditions in land surface models , 2013 .

[12]  C. Szczypta Hydrologie spatiale pour le suivi des sécheresses du bassin méditerranéen , 2012 .

[13]  H. Velthuizen,et al.  Harmonized World Soil Database (version 1.2) , 2008 .

[14]  Jean-Christophe Calvet,et al.  Investigating soil and atmospheric plant water stress using physiological and micrometeorological data , 2000 .

[15]  E. Martin,et al.  Impact of the use of a CO 2 responsive land surface model in simulating the effect of climate change on the hydrology of French Mediterranean basins , 2011 .

[16]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere‐biosphere system , 2005 .

[17]  E. Martin,et al.  A computer-based system simulating snowpack structures as a tool for regional avalanche forecasting , 1999, Journal of Glaciology.

[18]  Shih-Chieh Kao,et al.  A large-scale, high-resolution hydrological model parameter data set for climate change impact assessment for the conterminous US , 2013 .

[19]  Dominique Carrer,et al.  Impact of precipitation and land biophysical variables on the simulated discharge of European and Mediterranean rivers , 2012 .

[20]  J. M. Sabater,et al.  From near-surface to root-zone soil moisture using different assimilation techniques , 2007 .

[21]  Frédéric Baret,et al.  Suitability of modelled and remotely sensed essential climate variables for monitoring Euro-Mediterranean droughts , 2013 .

[22]  Aaron Boone,et al.  The Influence of the Inclusion of Soil Freezing on Simulations by a Soil–Vegetation–Atmosphere Transfer Scheme , 2000 .

[23]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Investigating soil moisture-climate interactions in a changing climate: A review , 2010 .

[24]  J. Refsgaard Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models , 1997 .

[25]  P. Ciais,et al.  European‐wide simulations of croplands using an improved terrestrial biosphere model: 2. Interannual yields and anomalous CO2 fluxes in 2003 , 2010 .

[26]  Isabel F. Trigo,et al.  Incoming Solar and Infrared Radiation Derived from METEOSAT: Impact on the Modeled Land Water and Energy Budget over France , 2012 .

[27]  Vincent Rivalland,et al.  Modelling forest transpiration and CO2 fluxes—response to soil moisture stress , 2004 .

[28]  P. Jarvis The Interpretation of the Variations in Leaf Water Potential and Stomatal Conductance Found in Canopies in the Field , 1976 .

[29]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Modeling Root Water Uptake in Hydrological and Climate Models. , 2001 .

[30]  J. Mahfouf,et al.  The ISBA land surface parameterisation scheme , 1996 .

[31]  Zong-Liang Yang,et al.  Quantifying parameter sensitivity, interaction, and transferability in hydrologically enhanced versions of the Noah land surface model over transition zones during the warm season , 2010 .

[32]  S. Attinger,et al.  Implementing small scale processes at the soil-plant interface – the role of root architectures for calculating root water uptake profiles , 2009 .

[33]  Jean-Pierre Wigneron,et al.  Modelling LAI at a regional scale with ISBA-A-gs: comparison with satellite-derived LAI over southwestern France , 2009 .

[34]  Aaron Boone,et al.  Local evaluation of the Interaction between Soil Biosphere Atmosphere soil multilayer diffusion scheme using four pedotransfer functions , 2011 .

[35]  Jean-Louis Roujean,et al.  Past and future scenarios of the effect of carbon dioxide on plant growth and transpiration for three vegetation types of southwestern France , 2007 .

[36]  S. Planton,et al.  A Simple Parameterization of Land Surface Processes for Meteorological Models , 1989 .

[37]  N. Jarvis Simple physics-based models of compensatory plant water uptake: concepts and eco-hydrological consequences , 2011 .

[38]  J. Deardorff Efficient prediction of ground surface temperature and moisture, with inclusion of a layer of vegetation , 1978 .

[39]  J. Deardorff A Parameterization of Ground-Surface Moisture Content for Use in Atmospheric Prediction Models , 1977 .

[40]  S. Attinger,et al.  Incorporating dynamic root growth enhances the performance of Noah‐MP at two contrasting winter wheat field sites , 2014 .

[41]  A. Porporato,et al.  Onset of water stress, hysteresis in plant conductance, and hydraulic lift: Scaling soil water dynamics from millimeters to meters , 2008 .

[42]  C. Jacobs,et al.  Direct impact of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on regional transpiration , 1994 .

[43]  Florence Habets,et al.  Analysis of Near-Surface Atmospheric Variables: Validation of the SAFRAN Analysis over France , 2008 .

[44]  Jean-Louis Roujean,et al.  ECOCLIMAP-II/Europe: a twofold database of ecosystems and surface parameters at 1 km resolution based on satellite information for use in land surface, meteorological and climate models , 2012 .

[45]  Fabienne Maignan,et al.  Constraining a global ecosystem model with multi-site eddy-covariance data , 2012 .

[46]  Frédéric Baret,et al.  GEOV1: LAI and FAPAR essential climate variables and FCOVER global time series capitalizing over existing products. Part1: Principles of development and production , 2013 .

[47]  C. Müller,et al.  Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance , 2007 .

[48]  Vincent Rivalland,et al.  Transpiration and CO 2 fluxes of a pine forest: modelling the undergrowth effect , 2005 .

[49]  P. Ciais,et al.  European-wide simulations of croplands using an improved terrestrial biosphere model: Phenology and productivity , 2010 .

[50]  Jean-Christophe Calvet,et al.  Use of agricultural statistics to verify the interannual variability in land surface models: a case study over France with ISBA-A-gs , 2011 .

[51]  Jean-Pierre Wigneron,et al.  An interactive vegetation SVAT model tested against data from six contrasting sites , 1998 .

[52]  Naota Hanasaki,et al.  A reservoir operation scheme for global river routing models , 2006 .

[53]  Jean-Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry,et al.  A canopy radiative transfer scheme with explicit FAPAR for the interactive vegetation model ISBA‐A‐gs: Impact on carbon fluxes , 2013 .

[54]  N. Batjes,et al.  The Harmonized World Soil Database , 2009 .

[55]  E. Martin,et al.  A meteorological estimation of relevant parameters for snow models , 1993 .