Exploring knowledge-transfer dynamics in a South European region: breadth, intensity and informality of university-industry interactions in Andalusia

[1]  A. Salter,et al.  Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration , 2009 .

[2]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms , 2004 .

[3]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[4]  Q. Vuong.  Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses , 1989 .

[5]  Andrea Fosfuri,et al.  Managing External Knowledge Flows: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity , 2009 .

[6]  Christian Richter Østergaard,et al.  Knowledge flows through social networks in a cluster: Comparing university and industry links , 2009 .

[7]  R. Merton,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1975, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.

[8]  J. S. Long,et al.  Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables , 1997 .

[9]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[10]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Introduction to the special section: Heterogeneity and university-industry relations , 2011 .

[11]  F. Lissoni.  Academic inventors as brokers , 2010 .

[12]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[13]  Maria Theresa Larsen.  The implications of academic enterprise for public science: An overview of the empirical evidence , 2011 .

[14]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  The Role of Academic Technology Transfer Organizations in Improving Industry Science Links , 2005 .

[15]  J. Guerreiro,et al.  Diversidades de Sistemas de Inovação e Implicações nas Políticas Regionais: Comparação das Regiões do Algarve e da Andaluzia , 2012, RPER.

[16]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[17]  M. Abramovitz.  Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind , 1986, The Journal of Economic History.

[18]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[19]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[20]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? , 2007 .

[21]  D. Audretsch,et al.  Scientist commercialization as conduit of knowledge spillovers , 2009 .

[22]  P. Shapira,et al.  Organizational and institutional influences on creativity in scientific research , 2009 .

[23]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Regression Analysis of Count Data , 1998 .

[24]  E. Giuliani,et al.  Who are the researchers that are collaborating with industry? An analysis of the wine sectors in Chile, South Africa and Italy , 2010 .

[25]  W. Greene,et al.  Accounting for Excess Zeros and Sample Selection in Poisson and Negative Binomial Regression Models , 1994 .

[26]  Chang-Yang Lee,et al.  A theory of firm growth: Learning capability, knowledge threshold, and patterns of growth , 2010 .

[27]  Manuel Fernández-Esquinas,et al.  Measuring university–industry collaboration in a regional innovation system , 2010, Scientometrics.

[28]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  The spatial profile of university-business research partnerships , 2010 .

[29]  Valeria Arza,et al.  What drives the formation of ‘valuable’ university–industry linkages?: Insights from the wine industry , 2009 .