Independent assessment and outcomes of 196 short-tapered stems short-term follow-up and review of the literature

Background: Longer term outcome data are now becoming available for short-tapered femoral stems for cementless total hip arthroplasty. The shorter stem has a metaphyseal fit, loading the bone in this area, leading to physiological bone remodelling. It is also bone preserving, as it is 35 mm shorter. It may be easier to insert through a smaller incision and potentially reduce complication rates. We present a retrospective single surgeon case series of 196 patients (>53% follow-up over 5 years). All patients had the cementless ‘Microplasty Taperloc’ (Biomet). Primary outcome measures were femoral component revision rates. Secondary outcome measures included complications, patient-reported functional outcome scores (Oxford hip) and radiographic evidence of loosening. Methods: Patients were identified using electronic software. All were routinely followed up and assessed in clinic since implant introduction in 2009. Oxford hip scores were routinely obtained. A surgeon who had not carried out the procedure independently assessed radiographs. Results: One hundred ninety-six patients were identified. The revision rate was 0.5% due to an intraoperative peri-prosthetic fracture of the femur identified on post-operative radiograph. The complication rate was 2%, attributable to: subsidence of the prosthesis (one hip), post-operative dislocation (two hips), one of which required acetabular revision. Oxford hip scores increased on average from 21 to 45 (pre- to post-operatively). There were no signs of radiographic loosening. Conclusion: The results show that using the short-tapered stem is proving so far to be a reliable and safe alternative to its longer counterpart, with low complication rates in the short term.

[1]  K. Kutzner Short-Stem Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2019, General Principles of Orthopedics and Trauma.

[2]  F. Hossain,et al.  Early performance‐based and patient‐reported outcomes of a contemporary taper fit bone‐conserving short stem femoral component in total hip arthroplasty , 2017, The bone & joint journal.

[3]  J. Dargel,et al.  Low Short-Stem Revision Rates: 1-11 Year Results From 1888 Total Hip Arthroplasties. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  J. Callaghan,et al.  Two- to 4-Year Followup of a Short Stem THA Construct: Excellent Fixation, Thigh Pain a Concern , 2017, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  D. Zukor,et al.  Favorable Results of a Short, Tapered, Highly Porous, Proximally Coated Cementless Femoral Stem at a Minimum 4-Year Follow-Up. , 2016, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  R. Hopper,et al.  New Approach and Stem Increased Femoral Revision Rate in Total Hip Arthroplasty. , 2016, Orthopedics.

[7]  A. Stark,et al.  Lower periprosthetic bone loss and good fixation of an ultra-short stem compared to a conventional stem in uncemented total hip arthroplasty , 2015, Acta orthopaedica.

[8]  D. Naudie,et al.  A randomised trial comparing a short and a standard-length metaphyseal engaging cementless femoral stem using radiostereometric analysis. , 2015, The bone & joint journal.

[9]  R. Emerson,et al.  The short and "shorter" of it: >1750 tapered titanium stems at 6- to 88-month follow-up. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[10]  K. Gustke Short stems for total hip arthroplasty: initial experience with the Fitmore stem. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  Joanne B. Adams,et al.  A Short Tapered Stem Reduces Intraoperative Complications in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2012, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  J. McLaughlin,et al.  Cementless total hip replacement using second-generation components: a 12- to 16-year follow-up. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  N. Santori,et al.  Mid-term results of a custom-made short proximal loading femoral component. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  Joanne B. Adams,et al.  A short stem solution: through small portals. , 2009, Orthopedics.

[15]  K. An,et al.  Bone remodeling characteristics of a short-stemmed total hip replacement. , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[16]  Laura Pavan,et al.  The DePuy Proxima™ Hip: A Short Stem for Total Hip Arthroplasty. Early Experience and Technical Considerations , 2009, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[17]  Mark M. Dolan,et al.  The short stem: a thinking man's alternative to surface replacement. , 2008, Orthopedics.

[18]  J. McLaughlin,et al.  Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented tapered femoral component. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  J. Parvizi,et al.  Primary total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented femoral component: a long-term study of the Taperloc stem. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[20]  R. Bourne,et al.  Porous coated femoral fixation: the long and short of it! , 2003, Orthopedics.

[21]  Young-Hoo Kim Cementless total hip arthroplasty with a close proximal fit and short tapered distal stem (third-generation) prosthesis. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[22]  B F Morrey,et al.  Short-stemmed uncemented femoral component for primary hip arthroplasty. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  C. Engh,et al.  Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.