Patients’ Perceptions of Electronic Monitoring Devices Affect Medication Adherence in Hypertensive African Americans

Background: Electronic monitoring devices (EMDs) are regarded as the gold standard for assessing medication adherence in clinical research. However, little is known about the effect of patients’ acceptance of EMDs on medication adherence in African Americans with hypertension who are followed in primary care practices Objective: To assess patients’ perceptions of EMDs, their acceptance of EMDs, and the relationship of these perceptions to medication adherence in African Americans with hypertension who are followed in community-based practices. Methods: Patients were recruited from a larger randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of motivational interviewing on medication adherence and blood pressure in hypertensive African American patients followed in 2 New York City primary care practices. Medication adherence was assessed with a Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) during a 12-month monitoring period. At the 12-month follow-up, patients’ perceptions of the MEMS were assessed with a 17-item questionnaire. ANOVA was used to compare patients’ responses (agree, neither, disagree) with the MEMS adherence over the monitoring period. Tukey's post hoc tests were used to determine whether there were significant differences among the 3 groups. Results: Participants were predominantly women, low-income, unemployed, had a high school education, and were a mean age of 53 years. Approximately two-thirds of the participants stated that the MEMS helped them remember to take their medications, 93% reported that the MEMS was easy to open, 85% did not find it stressful, and 75% liked the MEMS and used it everyday. One-third of patients preferred using a pillbox and 25% did not like traveling with the MEMS. Patients who stated that they used the MEMS every day, felt comfortable using it in front of others, and remembered to put refills in the MEMS had significantly better adherence over the study period than did those who disagreed (p ≤ 0.05). Conclusions: African American patients treated for hypertension in community-based practices held positive perceptions about a MEMS. Perceptions about the practicality of a MEMS may yield important information about actual medication-taking behavior.

[1]  K. Farmer,et al.  Methods for measuring and monitoring medication regimen adherence in clinical trials and clinical practice. , 1999, Clinical therapeutics.

[2]  M. Burnier,et al.  Compliance with antihypertensive therapy. , 1999, Clinical and experimental hypertension.

[3]  C. Bova,et al.  Adjusting and Censoring Electronic Monitoring Device Data: Implications for Study Outcomes , 2006, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[4]  L. Vaur,et al.  Benefits of electronic pillboxes in evaluating treatment compliance of patients with mild to moderate hypertension , 1996, Journal of hypertension.

[5]  S. De Geest,et al.  Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for Action , 2003, European journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology.

[6]  Wanzhu Tu,et al.  Pharmacist Intervention to Improve Medication Adherence in Heart Failure , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[8]  Glenys A. Hamilton,et al.  Measuring Adherence in a Hypertension Clinical Trial , 2003, European journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology.

[9]  M. Prins,et al.  All that glisters is not gold: a comparison of electronic monitoring versus filled prescriptions – an observational study , 2006, BMC Health Services Research.

[10]  P. Muntner,et al.  Prevalence and Predictors of Poor Antihypertensive Medication Adherence in an Urban Health Clinic Setting , 2007, Journal of clinical hypertension.

[11]  R S Woodward,et al.  The effect of prescribed daily dose frequency on patient medication compliance. , 1990, Archives of internal medicine.

[12]  J. Neutel,et al.  Improving Patient Compliance: A Major Goal in the Management of Hypertension , 2003, Journal of clinical hypertension.

[13]  M. Burnier,et al.  Electronic compliance monitoring in resistant hypertension: the basis for rational therapeutic decisions , 2001, Journal of hypertension.

[14]  C. Bova,et al.  Use of Electronic Monitoring Devices to Measure Antiretroviral Adherence: Practical Considerations , 2005, AIDS and Behavior.

[15]  R. Belue,et al.  An RCT of the effect of motivational interviewing on medication adherence in hypertensive African Americans: rationale and design. , 2007, Contemporary clinical trials.

[16]  J. Newhouse,et al.  Hypertension treatment in a medicare population: adherence and systolic blood pressure control. , 2007, Clinical therapeutics.

[17]  C. Rand,et al.  Validation of patient reports, automated pharmacy records, and pill counts with electronic monitoring of adherence to antihypertensive therapy. , 1999, Medical care.

[18]  N. Ampel,et al.  Barriers to Use of Electronic Adherence Monitoring in an HIV Clinic , 2001, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.