Frequency and Predictors of Internal Mammary Artery Graft Failure and Subsequent Clinical Outcomes: Insights From the PREVENT IV Trial

Background —The internal mammary artery (IMA) is the preferred conduit for bypassing the left anterior descending (LAD) artery in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Systematic evaluation of the frequency and predictors of IMA failure and long-term outcomes is lacking. Methods and Results —PREVENT IV trial participants who underwent IMA-LAD revascularization and had 12-18-month angiographic follow-up (n=1539) were included. Logistic regression with fast false selection rate methods was used to identify characteristics associated with IMA failure (≥75% stenosis). The relationship between IMA failure and long-term outcomes including death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization was assessed using Cox regression. IMA failure occurred in 132 participants (8.6%). Predictors of IMA graft failure were LAD stenosis <75% (odds ratio [OR], 1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-2.59), additional bypass graft to diagonal branch (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.33-2.76), and not having diabetes (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.20-2.78). LAD stenosis and additional diagonal graft remained predictive of IMA failure in an alternative model that included angiographic failure or death before angiography as the outcome. IMA failure was associated with a significantly higher incidence of subsequent acute (<14 days of angiography) clinical events, mostly due to a higher rate of repeat revascularization. Conclusions —IMA failure was common and associated with higher rates of repeat revascularization, and patients with intermediate LAD stenosis or with an additional bypass graft to the diagonal branch had increased risk for IMA failure. These findings raise concerns regarding competitive flow and the benefit of CABG in intermediate LAD stenosis without functional evidence of ischemia. Clinical Trial Registration Information —ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT00042081.

[1]  A. Go,et al.  Adoption and effectiveness of internal mammary artery grafting in coronary artery bypass surgery among Medicare beneficiaries. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  D. Glineur,et al.  Five-year follow-up of drug-eluting stents implantation vs minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass for left anterior descending artery disease: a propensity score analysis. , 2013, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[3]  Renu Virmani,et al.  Why is the mammary artery so special and what protects it from atherosclerosis? , 2013, Annals of cardiothoracic surgery.

[4]  I. White,et al.  Review of inverse probability weighting for dealing with missing data , 2013, Statistical methods in medical research.

[5]  Eric M. Reyes,et al.  Edifoligide and long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting: PRoject of Ex-vivo Vein graft ENgineering via Transfection IV (PREVENT IV) 5-year results. , 2012, American heart journal.

[6]  V. Chair,et al.  ACCF/AHA Practice Guideline 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines , 2011 .

[7]  K. Grove,et al.  Expression and function of endothelial nitric oxide synthase messenger RNA and protein are higher in internal mammary than in radial arteries. , 2011, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[8]  Yujun Wu,et al.  Fast FSR Variable Selection with Applications to Clinical Trials , 2009, Biometrics.

[9]  S. Pocock,et al.  Coronary artery bypass surgery compared with percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel disease: a collaborative analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials , 2009, The Lancet.

[10]  Robert M Califf,et al.  The PRoject of Ex-vivo Vein graft ENgineering via Transfection IV (PREVENT IV) trial: study rationale, design, and baseline patient characteristics. , 2005, American heart journal.

[11]  R. Califf,et al.  Efficacy and safety of edifoligide, an E2F transcription factor decoy, for prevention of vein graft failure following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: PREVENT IV: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005, JAMA.

[12]  Robert J Anderson,et al.  Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  Uwe Siebert,et al.  Long-Term Patency of Internal Mammary Artery Bypass Grafts: Relationship With Preoperative Severity of the Native Coronary Artery Stenosis , 2004, Circulation.

[14]  N. Smedira,et al.  Radial Artery Bypass Grafts Have an Increased Occurrence of Angiographically Severe Stenosis and Occlusion Compared With Left Internal Mammary Arteries and Saphenous Vein Grafts , 2004, Circulation.

[15]  Eugene H Blackstone,et al.  Does competitive flow reduce internal thoracic artery graft patency? , 2003, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[16]  A. Manzoli,et al.  Severity of coronary artery stenosis at preoperative angiography and midterm mammary graft status. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[17]  R. Villareal,et al.  The string phenomenon: an important cause of internal mammary artery graft failure. , 2000, Texas Heart Institute journal.

[18]  H. Manninen,et al.  Angiographic predictors of graft patency and disease progression after coronary artery bypass grafting with arterial and venous grafts. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[19]  Y. Ikari,et al.  Effects of competitive blood flow on arterial graft patency and diameter. Medium-term postoperative follow-up. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[20]  F. Loop Internal-thoracic-artery grafts. Biologically better coronary arteries. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  F. Loop,et al.  Surgical treatment of isolated left anterior descending coronary stenosis. Comparison of left internal mammary artery and venous autograft at 18 to 20 years of follow-up. , 1994, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[22]  G. E. Green,et al.  Clinical implications of internal mammary artery bypass grafts: the Coronary Artery Surgery Study experience. , 1988, Circulation.

[23]  R. Virmani,et al.  A comparison of morphologic and angiographic findings in long-term internal mammary artery and saphenous vein bypass grafts. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  W. C. Sheldon,et al.  Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  H. Kay,et al.  Atherosclerosis of the internal mammary artery. , 1976, The Annals of thoracic surgery.