Next-generation vision testing: the quick CSF

Abstract The Contrast Sensitivity Function relates the spatial frequency and contrast of a spatial pattern to its visibility and thus provides a fundamental description of visual function. However, the current clinical standard of care typically restricts assessment to visual acuity, i.e. the smallest stimulus size that can be resolved at full contrast; alternatively, tests of contrast sensitivity are typically restricted to assessment of the lowest visible contrast for a fixed letter size. This restriction to one-dimensional subspaces of a two-dimensional space was necessary when stimuli were printed on paper charts and simple scoring rules were applied manually. More recently, however, computerized testing and electronic screens have enabled more flexible stimulus displays and more complex test algorithms. For example, the quick CSF method uses a Bayesian adaptive procedure and an information maximization criterion to select only informative stimuli; testing times to precisely estimate the whole contrast sensitivity function are reduced to 2-5 minutes. Here, we describe the implementation of the quick CSF method in a medical device. We make several usability enhancements to make it suitable for use in clinical settings. A first usability study shows excellent results, with a mean System Usability Scale score of 86.5.

[1]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex , 1977 .

[2]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[3]  D. G. Green,et al.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  A. M. Rohaly,et al.  Modeling the contrast-sensitivity functions of older adults. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  Russell L. Woods,et al.  The role of contrast sensitivity charts and contrast letter charts in clinical practice , 1995 .

[6]  M. Dorr,et al.  Introducing a new method to assess vision: Computer-adaptive contrast-sensitivity testing predicts visual functioning better than charts in multiple sclerosis patients , 2015, Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical.

[7]  Philip T. Kortum,et al.  Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale , 2009 .

[8]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the contrast sensitivity function: the quick CSF method. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[9]  F. Jäkel,et al.  Spatial four-alternative forced-choice method is the preferred psychophysical method for naïve observers. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[10]  Michael Dorr,et al.  Using 10AFC to further improve the efficiency of the quick CSF method. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[11]  A. Watson,et al.  A standard model for foveal detection of spatial contrast. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[12]  V Zemon,et al.  Contrast sensitivity testing: A more complete assessment of vision , 1989, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.