Distributed real-time hybrid simulation: Modeling, development and experimental validation

Ozdagli, Ali Irmak Ph.D., Purdue University, May 2015. Distributed Real-time Hybrid Simulation: Modeling, Development and Experimental Validation. Major Professor: Shirley J. Dyke. Real-time hybrid simulation (RTHS) has become a recognized methodology for isolating and evaluating performance of critical structural components under potentially catastrophic events such as earthquakes. Although RTHS is efficient in its utilization of equipment and space compared to traditional testing methods such as shake table testing, laboratory resources may not always be available in one location to conduct appropriate large-scale experiments. Consequently, distributed systems, capable of connecting multiple RTHS setups located at numerous geographically distributed facilities through information exchange, become essential. This dissertation focuses on the development, evaluation and validation of a new distributed RTHS (dRTHS) platform enabling integration of physical and numerical components of RTHS in geographically distributed locations over the Internet. One significant challenge for conducting successful dRTHS over the Internet is sustaining real-time communication between test sites. The network is not consistent and variations in the Quality of Service (QoS) are expected. Since dRTHS is delaysensitive by nature, a fixed transmission rate with minimum jitter and latency in the network traffic should be maintained during an experiment. A Smith predictor can compensate network delays, but requires use of a known dead time for optimal operation. The platform proposed herein is developed to mitigate the aforementioned challenge. An easily programmable environment is provided based on MATLAB/xPC. In this method, (i) a buffer is added to the simulation loop to minimize network jitter and stabilize the transmission rate, and (ii) a routine is implemented to estimate the network time delay on-the-fly for the optimal operation of the Smith predictor. xvii The performance of the proposed platform is investigated through a series of numerical and experimental studies. An illustrative demonstration is conducted using a three story structure equipped with an MR damper. The structure is tested on the shake table and its global responses are compared to RTHS and dRTHS configurations where the physical MR damper and numerical structural model are tested in local and geographically distributed laboratories. The main contributions of this research are twofold: (1) dRTHS is validated as a feasible testing methodology, alternative to traditional and modern testing techniques such as shake table testing and RTHS, and (ii) the proposed platform serves as a viable environment for researchers to develop, evaluate and validate their own tools, investigate new methods to conduct dRTHS and advance the research in this area to the limits.

[1]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Geographically Distributed Real-Time Hybrid Simulation of MR Dampers for Seismic Hazard Mitigation , 2012 .

[2]  Xiuyu Gao,et al.  Real time hybrid simulation: from dynamic system, motion control to experimental error , 2013 .

[3]  Richard S. Pappa,et al.  Eigensystem realization algorithm user's guide forVAX/VMS computers: Version 931216 , 1994 .

[4]  Şevki Çeşmeci,et al.  Comparison of some existing parametric models for magnetorheological fluid dampers , 2010 .

[5]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  A framework for multi-site distributed simulation and application to complex structural systems , 2012 .

[6]  Gregory L. Fenves,et al.  Software framework for distributed experimental–computational simulation of structural systems , 2006 .

[7]  M. V. Sivaselvan,et al.  Hybrid Seismic Response Simulation on a Geographically Distributed Bridge Model , 2008 .

[8]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Passive Energy Dissipation Systems for Structural Design and Retrofit , 1998 .

[9]  Henning Schulzrinne,et al.  RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications , 1996, RFC.

[10]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Pseudodynamic Method for Seismic Testing , 1985 .

[11]  Tim Kindberg,et al.  Distributed Systems: Concepts and Design (4th Edition) (International Computer Science) , 2005 .

[12]  Bogdan M. Wilamowski,et al.  The Transmission Control Protocol , 2005, The Industrial Information Technology Handbook.

[13]  Makoto Ohsaki,et al.  Development of peer‐to‐peer (P2P) internet online hybrid test system , 2006 .

[14]  Bin Wu,et al.  Robust integrated actuator control: experimental verification and real‐time hybrid‐simulation implementation , 2015 .

[15]  Marina Schroder,et al.  Structural Control Past Present And Future , 2016 .

[16]  Dean Karnopp,et al.  Vibration Control Using Semi-Active Force Generators , 1974 .

[17]  강준원,et al.  Mechanics of Rubber Bearings for Seismic and Vibration Isolation , 2014 .

[18]  Jürgen Falb,et al.  The Internet Protocol , 2005, The Industrial Information Technology Handbook.

[19]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Modeling and Control of Magnetorheological Dampers for Seismic Response Reduction , 1996 .

[20]  B. Sp,et al.  State of the Art of Structural Control , 2003 .

[21]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-of-the- practice , 2002 .

[22]  D.C. Verma,et al.  Delay jitter control for real-time communication in a packet switching network , 1991, Proceedings of TRICOMM `91: IEEE Conference on Communications Software: Communications for Distributed Applications and Systems.

[23]  B. Taranath Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings , 2004 .

[24]  Arun Prakash,et al.  Establishing a stability switch criterion for effective implementation of real-time hybrid simulation , 2014 .

[25]  Yurong Guo,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A NETWORK PLATFORM FOR REMOTE HYBRID DYNAMIC TESTING , 2002 .

[26]  Victor E. Saouma,et al.  Hybrid Simulation: Theory, Implementation and Applications , 2008 .

[27]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Model-Based Feedforward-Feedback Actuator Control for Real-Time Hybrid Simulation , 2013 .

[28]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Analysis of actuator delay compensation methods for real-time testing , 2009 .

[29]  Mansour A. Karkoub,et al.  Active/semi-active suspension control using magnetorheological actuators , 2006, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[30]  Juan M. Caicedo,et al.  Practical guidelines for the natural excitation technique (NExT) and the eigensystem realization algorithm (ERA) for modal identification using ambient vibration , 2011 .

[31]  Chia-Ming Chang,et al.  Application of active base isolation control , 2009, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[32]  S. Dyke,et al.  RTHS WITH CONCURRENT MODEL UPDATING ON A DISTRIBUTED PLATFORM , 2015 .

[33]  D. L. Brown,et al.  IMPULSE TECHNIQUE FOR STRUCTURAL FREQUENCY RESPONSE TESTING , 1977 .

[34]  Roger Pinnington,et al.  Vibration testing, theory and practice , 1998 .

[35]  Al Morton,et al.  Packet Delay Variation Applicability Statement , 2009, RFC.

[36]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Development of real‐time pseudo dynamic testing , 1992 .

[37]  O. J. M. Smith,et al.  A controller to overcome dead time , 1959 .

[38]  Luca Massimo Giacosa,et al.  Control-Oriented System Identification Using ERA , 2002 .

[39]  Y. Wen Method for Random Vibration of Hysteretic Systems , 1976 .

[40]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  MR damping system on Dongting Lake cable-stayed bridge , 2003, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[41]  Jer-Nan Juang,et al.  An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction. [control systems design for large space structures] , 1985 .

[42]  Arun Prakash,et al.  Establishing a predictive performance indicator for real‐time hybrid simulation , 2014 .

[43]  Zhaoshuo Jiang,et al.  A comparison of 200 kN magneto-rheological damper models for use in real-time hybrid simulation pretesting , 2011 .

[44]  John Anthony Cafeo,et al.  Tutorial. Signal processing aspects of structural impact testing , 1992 .

[45]  Narutoshi Nakata,et al.  Effective force testing using a robust loop shaping controller , 2013 .

[46]  Chia-Ming Chang,et al.  Experimental verification of a wireless sensing and control system for structural control using MR dampers , 2007 .

[47]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Intelligent Base Isolation Systems , 1998 .

[48]  L. G. Jaeger,et al.  Dynamics of structures , 1990 .

[49]  James T. P. Yao,et al.  CONCEPT OF STRUCTURAL CONTROL , 1972 .

[50]  Zapateiro de la Hoz,et al.  Semiactive control strategies for vibration mitigation in adaptronic structures equipped with magnetorheological dampers , 2009 .

[51]  A. Emin Aktan,et al.  Structural identification of constructed systems : approaches, methods, and technologies for effective practice of St-Id , 2013 .

[52]  T. Başar,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2001 .

[53]  Richard Christenson,et al.  Large-Scale Experimental Verification of Semiactive Control through Real-Time Hybrid Simulation , 2008 .

[54]  Rajeev Koodli,et al.  One-way Loss Pattern Sample Metrics , 2002, RFC.

[55]  K. Nagata,et al.  On-line pseudo-dynamic network testing on base-isolated bridges using Internet and wireless Internet , 2004 .

[56]  Daniel Atkins,et al.  Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure , 2003 .

[57]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  NEESGRID: A DISTRIBUTED COLLABORATORY FOR ADVANCED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT AND SIMULATION , 2004 .

[58]  Yuan-Sen Yang,et al.  ISEE: Internet‐based Simulation for Earthquake Engineering—Part I: Database approach , 2007 .

[59]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Development of a cyber-physical experimental platform for real-time dynamic model updating , 2013 .

[60]  Juan Carrion,et al.  Model-Based Strategies for Real-Time Hybrid Testing , 2007 .

[61]  Andrew J. Kurdila,et al.  『Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics』(私の一冊) , 2019, Journal of the Society of Mechanical Engineers.

[62]  Erik A. Johnson,et al.  NATURAL EXCITATION TECHNIQUE AND EIGENSYSTEM REALIZATION ALGORITHM FOR PHASE I OF THE IASC-ASCE BENCHMARK PROBLEM: SIMULATED DATA , 2004 .

[63]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Event-Driven Control System for Geographically Distributed Hybrid Simulation , 2006 .

[64]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODEL FOR MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL DAMPERS , 1997 .

[65]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Hybrid Simulation Primer and Dictionary , 2014 .

[66]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  ISEE: Internet‐based Simulation for Earthquake Engineering—Part II: The application protocol approach , 2007 .