Emergy-based evaluation of peri-urban ecosystem services

Abstract Peri-urban areas are often characterized by valuable natural environments that provide essential life-support functions and ecosystem services for urban residents. Global environmental change has raised concerns over how urbanization and land use and land cover change affect ecosystem services. This study applied systems ecology theory and ecological energetic analysis to value the worth of natural environment and ecosystem services to a socioeconomic system. We begin with a general discussion of peri-urban areas and their ecosystem services. An emergy approach is applied to establish a framework for evaluating the ecosystem services by identifying systemic roles of each system components. The two-part framework includes: (1) an emergy evaluation of energetic flows of ecosystem services; and (2) an impact matrix to analyze systemic roles of services in the analyzed system. On the basis of the proposed valuation framework and land cover types in the greater Taipei area, this study analyzed ten ecosystems to determine how they interact, via energy flows, to contribute services to human society. By converting all stocks and flows into common emergy units, an impact matrix is constructed to analyze the systemic role of ecosystem components by classifying their status of being active, reactive, critical or indifferent. The analytical results indicate that the soil component of forest ecosystems, upstream rivers and agricultural productivity play critical role of ecosystem services in the study region. The effect of land cover change during 1971–2006 in the study region on ecosystem services is also analyzed. Finally, the implications of biophysical valuation of ecosystem service for spatial planning as related to adapting to global environmental change are discussed.

[1]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[2]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Solution spaces for decision-making—a sustainability assessment tool for city-regions , 2005 .

[3]  Sherry Brandt-Williams,et al.  Theory and Applications of the Emergy Methodology , 2000 .

[4]  Shu-Li Huang,et al.  Sprawl in Taipei’s peri-urban zone: Responses to spatial planning and implications for adapting global environmental change , 2009 .

[5]  Shu-li Huang,et al.  Stream order, hierarchy, and energy convergence of land use , 2007 .

[6]  Scott Goetz,et al.  Urbanization and the Loss of Resource Lands in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed , 2005, Environmental management.

[7]  R. D. Groot,et al.  A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services , 2002 .

[8]  Gabriele Rosa Maria Harrer.  The Biocybernetic Approach as a Basis for Planning and Governance , 2010 .

[9]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Emergy Analysis and Environmental Accounting , 2004 .

[10]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Impact factors and regulatory mechanisms for material flow management : Integrating stakeholder and scientific perspectives The case of bio-waste delivery , 2006 .

[11]  M. Antrop.  Changing patterns in the urbanized countryside of Western Europe , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[12]  A. McMichael,et al.  Ecosystems and Human well-being , 2003 .

[13]  D. Simon,et al.  The peri-urban interface: approaches to sustainable natural and human resource use , 2006 .

[14]  A. J. Dolman,et al.  Global Environmental Change and Land Use , 2003 .

[15]  William A. Gould,et al.  Land development, land use, and urban sprawl in Puerto Rico integrating remote sensing and population census data , 2007 .

[16]  J. Bouma,et al.  Land use change under conditions of high population pressure : the case of Java , 1999 .

[17]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Environment, Power, and Society , 1972 .

[18]  Shu-Li Huang,et al.  A systems approach for the development of a sustainable community--the application of the sensitivity model (SM). , 2004, Journal of environmental management.

[19]  D. Tilley,et al.  Emergy Basis of Forest Systems , 1999 .

[20]  A. Dolman,et al.  Land Use and Global Environmental Change , 2003 .

[21]  I. Douglas.  Peri-Urban Ecosystems and Societies: Transitional Zones and Contrasting Values , 2006 .

[22]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Environment, Power, and Society , 1972 .

[23]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making , 1995 .

[24]  J. Newell,et al.  Twenty-five years of sprawl in the Seattle region: growth management responses and implications for conservation , 2005 .

[25]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes , 2006 .

[26]  Cutler J. Cleveland,et al.  Encyclopedia of Energy , 2004 .

[27]  G. Daily.  Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. , 1998 .

[28]  H. Odum,et al.  Self-Organization, Transformity, and Information , 1988, Science.

[29]  Shu-li Huang,et al.  Theory of urban energetics and mechanisms of urban development , 2005 .

[30]  Frederic Vester.  The biocybernetic approach as a basis for planning our environment , 1988 .

[31]  K. Seto,et al.  Quantifying Spatiotemporal Patterns of Urban Land-use Change in Four Cities of China with Time Series Landscape Metrics , 2005, Landscape Ecology.