new approach to quantify and map carbon stored , sequestered nd emissions avoided by urban forests

Abstract This paper describes the use of field surveys, biometric information for urban tree species and remote sensing to quantify and map carbon (C) storage, sequestration and avoided emissions from energy savings. Its primary contribution is methodological; the derivation and application of urban tree canopy (UTC) based transfer functions (t C ha−1 UTC). Findings for Los Angeles and Sacramento illustrate the complex role of regional and local determinants. Although average tree density and size were substantially greater in Los Angeles, the mean C storage density (8.15 t ha−1) was 53 percent of Sacramento's (15.4 t ha−1). In Sacramento, native oaks with very high wood densities (815 kg m−3) accounted for 30 percent of total basal area. In Los Angeles, the most dominant taxa had relatively low wood densities (350-550 kg m−3). The inclusion of relatively more wooded land in the Sacramento study area may partially explain higher C storage levels. In Los Angeles, where development is relatively dense, 14 percent of all trees surveyed shaded more than one building compared to only 2 percent in Sacramento. Consequently, the transfer function for avoided emissions in Los Angeles (2.77 t ha−1 UTC yr−1) exceeded Sacramento (2.72 t ha−1 UTC yr−1). The approach described here improves C estimates and increases the resolution at which C can be mapped across a region. It can be used to map baseline C storage levels for climate action planning, identify conservation areas where UTC densities are highest and determine where opportunities for expanding UTC are greatest.

[1]  Dagmar Haase,et al.  Above-ground carbon storage by urban trees in Leipzig, Germany: Analysis of patterns in a European city , 2012 .

[2]  J. E. Wagner,et al.  Analyzing the efficacy of subtropical urban forests in offsetting carbon emissions from cities , 2010 .

[3]  Tenley M. Conway,et al.  Community groups and urban forestry activity: Drivers of uneven canopy cover? , 2011 .

[4]  Xiaoma Li,et al.  Carbon storage and sequestration by urban forests in Shenyang, China , 2012 .

[5]  H. Lieth Modeling the Primary Productivity of the World , 1975 .

[6]  B. Stone The City and the Coming Climate: Climate Change in the Places We Live , 2012 .

[7]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  Assessing urban forest effects and values, Casper's urban forest , 2006 .

[8]  L. Hutyra,et al.  Inconsistent definitions of "urban" result in different conclusions about the size of urban carbon and nitrogen stocks. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[9]  H. Jo Impacts of urban greenspace on offsetting carbon emissions for middle Korea. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[10]  W. Simpson,et al.  Specific Gravity, Moisture Content, and Density Relationship for Wood , 1998 .

[11]  David J. Nowak,et al.  Evaluating The National Land Cover Database Tree Canopy and Impervious Cover Estimates Across the Conterminous United States: A Comparison with Photo-Interpreted Estimates , 2010, Environmental management.

[12]  Chris A. Martin,et al.  Urban horticultural ecology: Interactions between plants, people and the physical environment , 2004 .

[13]  Richard A. Birdsey,et al.  Comprehensive database of diameter-based biomass regressions for North American tree species , 2004 .

[14]  Teofilo Ozuna,et al.  Testing the Reliability of the Benefit Function Transfer Approach , 1996 .

[15]  F. Escobedo,et al.  Impacts of urban forests on offsetting carbon emissions from industrial energy use in Hangzhou, China. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[16]  Michael A. Lefsky,et al.  Volume estimates of trees with complex architecture from terrestrial laser scanning , 2008 .

[17]  Robert E. Hoehn,et al.  Assessing urban forest effects and values: Toronto's urban forest , 2013 .

[18]  Eric W. Hildebrandt,et al.  ASSESSING THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SMUD'S SHADE TREE PROGRAM , 1998 .

[19]  Yi-Chung Wang,et al.  Air quality enhancement zones in Taiwan: A carbon reduction benefit assessment , 2012 .

[20]  R. Pouyat,et al.  Carbon stocks in urban forest remnants: Atlanta and Baltimore as case studies. Chapter 5. , 2012 .

[21]  Susan L. Ustin,et al.  XIA-1 CHARACTERIZATION OF THE STRUCTURE AND SPECIES COMPOSITION OF URBAN TREES USING HIGH RESOLUTION AVIRIS DATA , 1999 .

[22]  H. Jo,et al.  Carbon Storage and Flux in Urban Residential Greenspace , 1995 .

[23]  R. D. Ramsey,et al.  Determinants of urban tree canopy in residential neighborhoods: Household characteristics, urban form, and the geophysical landscape , 2012, Urban Ecosystems.

[24]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  Assessing urban forest effects and values, Philladelphia's urban forest , 2007 .

[25]  C. Gries,et al.  Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  A. Troy,et al.  Data and Methods Comparing Social Structure and Vegetation Structure of Urban Neighborhoods in Baltimore, Maryland , 2006 .

[27]  Kenneth E. Skog,et al.  Managed Forest Carbon Estimates for the US Greenhouse Gas Inventory, 1990-2008 , 2011 .

[28]  A. Bachelor GLOSSARY OF TERMS GLOSSARY OF TERMS , 2010 .

[29]  D. Nowak,et al.  Urban and community forests of the Pacific region: California, Oregon, Washington , 2010 .

[30]  Q. Ketterings,et al.  Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predicting above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forests , 2001 .

[31]  James F. Palmer,et al.  Neighborhoods as stands in the urban forest , 1984 .

[32]  E. Mcpherson,et al.  Equations for Predicting Diameter, Height, Crown Width, and Leaf Area of San Joaquin Valley Street Trees , 2001, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[33]  E. Mcpherson,et al.  Energy Conservation Potential of Urban Tree Planting , 1993, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[34]  Helen R. Neill,et al.  Benefit Transfers: Conceptual and Empirical Issues , 1992 .

[35]  T. R. Wilson,et al.  Strength and Related Properties of Woods Grown in the United States , 1935 .

[36]  Dagmar Haase,et al.  Corrigendum to “Above-ground carbon storage by urban trees in Leipzig, Germany: Analysis of patterns in a European city” [Landscape Urban Plan. 104 (2012) 95–104] , 2012 .

[37]  R. Birdsey,et al.  National-Scale Biomass Estimators for United States Tree Species , 2003, Forest Science.

[38]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  A Ground-Based Method of Assessing Urban Forest Structure and Ecosystem Services , 2008 .

[39]  Keith C. Pelletier,et al.  An object-based system for LiDAR data fusion and feature extraction , 2013 .

[40]  Adam Berland Long-term urbanization effects on tree canopy cover along an urban–rural gradient , 2012, Urban Ecosystems.

[41]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  Assessing urban forest effects and values, San Francisco's urban forest , 2007 .

[42]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  Measuring and analyzing urban tree cover , 1996 .

[43]  E. Aguaron,et al.  Comparison of methods for estimating carbon dioxide storage by Sacramento's urban forest , 2012 .

[44]  Eileen H. Helmer,et al.  Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests , 1997, Oecologia.

[45]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  A synthesis of the science on forests and carbon for U.S. Forests , 2010 .

[46]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  Assessing urban forest effects and values, Washington, D.C.'s urban forest , 2006 .

[47]  M. Duggin,et al.  A temporal analysis of urban forest carbon storage using remote sensing , 2006 .

[48]  D. Nowak,et al.  Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. , 2002, Environmental pollution.

[49]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  Assessing urban forest effects and values, Chicago's urban forest , 2010 .

[50]  Qingfu Xiao,et al.  Municipal Forest Benefits and Costs in Five US Cities , 2005, Journal of Forestry.

[51]  W. Zipperer,et al.  Urban tree cover: an ecological perspective , 1997, Urban Ecosystems.

[52]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  Assessing urban forest effects and values, Minneapolis' urban forest , 2006 .

[53]  A time series of urban forestry in Los Angeles , 2012, Urban Ecosystems.

[54]  J. Terradas,et al.  Ecological services of urban forest in Barcelona , 2009 .

[55]  E. Gregory McPherson,et al.  Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Reduction by Sacramento's Urban Forest , 1998, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[56]  J. Simpson,et al.  Improved estimates of tree-shade effects on residential energy use , 2002 .

[57]  C. Brack,et al.  Carbon accounting model for forests in Australia. , 2002, Environmental pollution.

[58]  Joe R. McBride,et al.  The urban forest in Beijing and its role in air pollution reduction , 2005 .

[59]  Qingfu Xiao,et al.  Tree health mapping with multispectral remote sensing data at UC Davis, California , 2005, Urban Ecosystems.

[60]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  Assessing urban forest effects and values, New York City's urban forest , 2007 .

[61]  E. Mcpherson,et al.  Predictive Equations for Dimensions and Leaf Area of Coastal Southern California Street Trees , 2001, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[62]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  Assessing urban forest effects and values, Scranton's urban forest , 2010 .

[63]  Chunxia Wu,et al.  Million trees Los Angeles canopy cover and benefit assessment , 2011 .

[64]  R. A. Sanders Some determinants of urban forest structure , 1984 .

[65]  Robert E. Hoehn,et al.  Assessing urban forest effects and values, Los Angeles' urban forest , 2011 .

[66]  A. Chappelka,et al.  Evaluation of Sampling Protocol for i-Tree Eco: A Case Study in Predicting Ecosystem Services at Auburn University , 2013, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.