Quantifying the use of brush mats in reducing forwarder peak loads and surface contact pressures.

Nacrtak Forest biomass from timber harvesting residues is often used during mechanized forest opera­ tions to improve trafficability of strip roads (machine operating trails). In particular, during cut-to-length operations brush mats from harvesting residues are created on operating trails to reduce rutting. However, forest biomass is becoming increasingly important as a source of renewable energy. To maintain its full calorific value as a biofuel, brush (tree limbs, tops, and foliage) needs to be free of any mineral soil, which is considered a contaminant in this context. In cut-to-length operations, this eliminates any use of brush as a mat to improve trafficability on machine operating trails since it gets in direct contact with mineral soil. Using brush ex­ clusively for biofuel will leave operating trails uncovered and can result in severe damage to forest soils. To manage the two competing uses of brush, it would be helpful to determine minimum brush amounts needed for efficient soil protection as it would potentially allow utilizing remaining brush as biofuel. This study assessed brush mats for their ability to dis­ tribute applied loads. As load distributing capacity of a brush mat increases, so does the resulting soil protecting effect. A total of 15 test scenarios were performed with a forwarder to analyze differences in peak loads recorded underneath brush mats of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 kg m (green mass) each subjected to 12 traffic cycles of a forwarder including unloaded and loaded movements. Highest loads were recorded within the first few forwarding cycles located on the 5 kg m brush mat and then decreased on average by 23.5% as brush amount increased up to 30 kg m. When no brush was used (0 kg m) and the forwarder was in direct contact with the steel surface of the load test platform, we noticed that 97% of all peak surface contact pres­ sures recorded exceeded the 150 kPa pressure threshold, compared to only 41% when the forwarder was driven over the 30 kg m brush mat.

[1]  Lars Eliasson,et al.  Effects of slash reinforcement of strip roads on rutting and soil compaction on a moist fine-grained soil , 2007 .

[2]  Henry A. Froehlich,et al.  Minimizing soil compaction in Pacifc Northwest forests , 1983 .

[3]  Pacific Northwest Cooperative Extension,et al.  Compaction of forest soils , 1981 .

[4]  C. Nugent,et al.  Characteristic site disturbance due to harvesting and extraction machinery traffic on sensitive forest sites with peat soils , 2003 .

[5]  Sang-kyun Han,et al.  Soil compaction associated with cut-to-length and whole-tree harvesting of a coniferous forest , 2009 .

[6]  J. F. McNeel,et al.  Analysis of Site Stand Impacts from Thinning with a Harvester-Forwarder System , 1992 .

[7]  Sang-Kyun Han,et al.  Effects of Slash, Machine Passes, and Soil Moisture on Penetration Resistance in a Cut-to-length Harvesting , 2006 .

[8]  H. Fang,et al.  Introductory Geotechnical Engineering: An Environmental Perspective , 2006 .

[9]  M. Vepraskas Bulk Density Values Diagnostic of Restricted Root Growth in Coarse‐textured Soils , 1988 .

[10]  S. Brais,et al.  Soil compaction induced by careful logging in the claybelt region of northwestern Quebec (Canada) , 1998 .

[11]  T. Kozlowski Soil Compaction and Growth of Woody Plants , 1999 .

[12]  Abdullah E. Akay,et al.  The Impacts of Ground-Based Logging Equipment on Forest Soil , 2007 .

[13]  Henry A. Froehlich Soil compaction from logging equipment: Effects on growth of young ponderosa pine , 1979 .

[14]  M. J. Wood,et al.  Improving the Design of Slash Roads Used to Reduce Soil Disturbance During Mechanised Harvesting of Coniferous Forest Plantations in the UK , 2003 .

[15]  I. Corns,et al.  Compaction by forestry equipment and effects on coniferous seedling growth on four soils in the Alberta foothills , 1988 .

[16]  Henry A. Froehlich,et al.  Growth of young Pinus ponderosa and Pinus contorta on compacted soil in central Washington , 1986 .

[17]  Pete Bettinger,et al.  Residual stand damage from cut-to-length thinning of second-growth timber in the Cascade range of western Oregon. , 1993 .

[18]  Lars Eliasson,et al.  Effects of forwarder tyre pressure on rut formation and soil compaction , 2005 .

[19]  C. Dehoop,et al.  Assessment of Site and Stand Disturbance From Cut-To-Length Harvesting , 1999 .

[20]  BOTANiCAL Gazette,et al.  Handbook of Soil Science , 1933, Botanical Gazette.

[21]  Eric R. Labelle,et al.  Soil Compaction Caused by Cut‐to‐Length Forest Operations and Possible Short‐Term Natural Rehabilitation of Soil Density , 2011 .

[22]  Dr. Pentti Hakkila Utilization of Residual Forest Biomass , 1989, Springer Series in Wood Science.

[23]  M. Bock,et al.  Forest harvesting impacts on soil properties and vegetation communities in the Northwest Territories , 2002 .

[24]  L. Gurău,et al.  COMPARISON OF THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF BRANCH AND STEM WOOD FOR THREE SPECIES , 2008 .

[25]  Jack B. Evett,et al.  Soils and Foundations , 1965, Nature.

[26]  L. Kuo-Huang,et al.  Anatomical characteristics of the secondary phloem in branches of Zelkova serrata Makino , 2005 .

[27]  E. B. Wronski,et al.  Trafficability assessment as an aid to planning logging operations , 1990 .

[28]  Timothy P. McDonald,et al.  Effect of Slash on Forwarder Soil Compaction , 2013 .

[29]  C. G. Vidrine,et al.  Effect of Logging Equipment Traffic On Soil Density and Growth and Survival of Young Loblolly Pine , 1984 .

[30]  Robert A. Tufts,et al.  Valmet's Woodstar Series Harvesting System: A Case Study , 1993 .

[31]  W. B. Voorhees,et al.  Compaction and Soil Structure Modification by Wheel Traffic in the Northern Corn Belt1 , 1978 .

[32]  S. Gessel,et al.  Soil Properties Related to Forest Cover Type and Productivity on the Lee Forest, Snohomish County, Washington1 , 1955 .

[33]  D. Jaeger,et al.  Influence of Two Ground-Based Skidding Systems on Soil Compaction Under Different Slope and Gradient Conditions , 2008 .