High-Fidelity Fluid Structure Coupled Simulations for Underwater Propulsion Using Flexible Biomimetic Fins

The ability of fish to maneuver in tight places, perform stable high acceleration maneuvers, and hover efficiently has inspired the development of underwater robots propelled by flexible fins mimicking those of fish. In general, fin propulsion is a challenging fluid-structure interaction (FSI) problem characterized by large structural deformation and strong added-mass effect. It was recently reported that a simplified computational model using the vortex panel method for the fluid flow is not able to accurately predict thrust generation. In this work, a high-fidelity, fluid-structure coupled computational framework is applied to predict the propulsive performance of a series of biomimetic fins of various dimensions, shapes, and stiffness. This computational framework couples a three-dimensional finite-volume Navier-Stokes computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solver and a nonlinear, finite-element computational structural dynamics (CSD) solver in a partitioned procedure. The large motion and deformation of the fluid-structure interface is handled using a validated, state-of-the-art embedded boundary method. The notorious numerical added-mass effect, that is, a numerical instability issue commonly encountered in FSI simulations involving incompressible fluid flows and light (compared to fluid) structures, is suppressed by accounting for water compressibility in the CFD model and applying a low-Mach preconditioner in the CFD solver. Both one-way and two-way coupled simulations are performed for a series of flexible fins with different thickness. Satisfactory agreement between the simulation prediction and the corresponding experimental data is achieved.Copyright © 2015 by ASME

[1]  G. Lauder,et al.  Passive robotic models of propulsion by the bodies and caudal fins of fish. , 2012, Integrative and comparative biology.

[2]  Kevin G. Wang,et al.  Predictive Simulation of Underwater Implosion: Coupling Multi-Material Compressible Fluids With Cracking Structures , 2014 .

[3]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  A computational framework for the simulation of high‐speed multi‐material fluid–structure interaction problems with dynamic fracture , 2015 .

[4]  Ashok K. Kancharala,et al.  Enhanced hydrodynamic performance of flexible fins using macro fiber composite actuators , 2014 .

[5]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  An ALE formulation of embedded boundary methods for tracking boundary layers in turbulent fluid-structure interaction problems , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[6]  G. Lauder,et al.  Caudal fin shape modulation and control during acceleration, braking and backing maneuvers in bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[7]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  FIVER: A finite volume method based on exact two-phase Riemann problems and sparse grids for multi-material flows with large density jumps , 2012, J. Comput. Phys..

[8]  A. Smits,et al.  Thrust production and wake structure of a batoid-inspired oscillating fin , 2005, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  Kevin G. Wang,et al.  Algorithms for interface treatment and load computation in embedded boundary methods for fluid and fluid–structure interaction problems , 2011 .

[10]  Fabio Nobile,et al.  Added-mass effect in the design of partitioned algorithms for fluid-structure problems , 2005 .

[11]  Wayne L. Neu,et al.  A biologically inspired artificial fish using flexible matrix composite actuators: analysis and experiment , 2010 .

[12]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Computational algorithms for tracking dynamic fluid–structure interfaces in embedded boundary methods , 2012 .

[13]  M. J. Wolfgang,et al.  Drag reduction in fish-like locomotion , 1999, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  Kevin G. Wang,et al.  Dynamic implosion of underwater cylindrical shells: Experiments and Computations , 2013 .

[15]  A K Kancharala,et al.  Study of flexible fin and compliant joint stiffness on propulsive performance: theory and experiments , 2014, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[16]  G. Lauder,et al.  Dynamics of freely swimming flexible foils , 2011 .

[17]  E. Ramm,et al.  Artificial added mass instabilities in sequential staggered coupling of nonlinear structures and incompressible viscous flows , 2007 .

[18]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Robust and provably second‐order explicit–explicit and implicit–explicit staggered time‐integrators for highly non‐linear compressible fluid–structure interaction problems , 2010 .

[19]  Christopher J. Esposito,et al.  A robotic fish caudal fin: effects of stiffness and motor program on locomotor performance , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[20]  Silas Alben,et al.  Optimal flexibility of a flapping appendage in an inviscid fluid , 2008, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[21]  George V Lauder,et al.  Speed-dependent intrinsic caudal fin muscle recruitment during steady swimming in bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[22]  Afzal Suleman,et al.  Fluid-Structure Interaction Issues in Deformation Based Subsea Propulsion Systems , 2005 .

[23]  E. Turkel,et al.  Preconditioned methods for solving the incompressible low speed compressible equations , 1987 .

[24]  Kamal Youcef-Toumi,et al.  Design of Machines With Compliant Bodies for Biomimetic Locomotion in Liquid Environments , 2006 .