Electrical interference in non-competitive pacemakers

Patients with 41 implanted non-competitive pacemakers were investigated. A variety of domestic electrical equipment, a motor-car, and a physiotherapy diathermy apparatus were each operated in turn at various ranges from the patient. Interference effects on pacemaker function were assessed on the electrocardiograph. Medtronic demand 5841 pacemakers were stopped by diathermy while Cordis Ectocor pacemakers developed a fast discharge rate. Cordis triggered pacemakers (both Atricor and Ectocor) were sensitive to interference from many items of domestic equipment and the motor car. The Elema EM153 ran at an increased rate when an electric razor was running close to the pacemaker. The Devices demand 2980 and the Medtronic demand 5841 were not affected by the domestic equipment tested. The significance of interference effects is discussed in relation to pacemaker design.

[1]  S. Furman,et al.  INPUT SIGNALS TO PACEMAKERS IN A HOSPITAL ENVIRONMENT * , 1969, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[2]  B. P. Dodinot,et al.  CLINICAL EXPERIENCE WITH ATRIAL‐SYNCHRONOUS PACING , 1969, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[3]  H. Voss,et al.  COMPARISON OF ASYNCHRONOUS AND DEMAND PACING * , 1969, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[4]  B Parker,et al.  The influence of electromagnetic environment on the performance of artificial cardiac pacemakers. , 1968, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  A. Gage,et al.  Five years' clinical experience with an implantable pacemaker: an appraisal. , 1965, Surgery.

[6]  I LICHTER,et al.  Radio-frequency Hazards with Cardiac Pacemakers , 1965, British medical journal.

[7]  R. A. Carleton,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCE ON IMPLANTABLE CARDIAC PACEMAKERS. , 1964, JAMA.