A contrast-oriented algorithm for FDG-PET-based delineation of tumour volumes for the radiotherapy of lung cancer: derivation from phantom measurements and validation in patient data

PurposeAn easily applicable algorithm for the FDG-PET-based delineation of tumour volumes for the radiotherapy of lung cancer was developed by phantom measurements and validated in patient data.MethodsPET scans were performed (ECAT-ART tomograph) on two cylindrical phantoms (phan1, phan2) containing glass spheres of different volumes (7.4–258 ml) which were filled with identical FDG concentrations. Gradually increasing the activity of the fillable background, signal-to-background ratios from 33:1 to 2.5:1 were realised. The mean standardised uptake value (SUV) of the region-of-interest (ROI) surrounded by a 70% isocontour (mSUV70) was used to represent the FDG accumulation of each sphere (or tumour). Image contrast was defined as:$$C = {{\left( {{\text{mSUV}}_{{\text{70}}} - {\text{BG}}} \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left( {{\text{mSUV}}_{{\text{70}}} - {\text{BG}}} \right)} {{\text{BG}}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {{\text{BG}}}}$$ where BG is the mean background − SUV. For the spheres of phan1, the threshold SUVs (TS) best matching the known sphere volumes were determined. A regression function representing the relationship between TS/(mSUV70 − BG) and C was calculated and used for delineation of the spheres in phan2 and the gross tumour volumes (GTVs) of eight primary lung tumours. These GTVs were compared to those defined using CT.ResultsThe relationship between TS/(mSUV70 − BG) and C is best described by an inverse regression function which can be converted to the linear relationship $${\text{TS}} = a \times {\text{mSUV}}_{70} + b \times {\text{BG}}$$. Using this algorithm, the volumes delineated in phan2 differed by only −0.4 to +0.7 mm in radius from the true ones, whilst the PET-GTVs differed by only −0.7 to +1.2 mm compared with the values determined by CT.ConclusionBy the contrast-oriented algorithm presented in this study, a PET-based delineation of GTVs for primary tumours of lung cancer patients is feasible.

[1]  D. Wood,et al.  The impact of fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 positron-emission tomography on the surgical staging of non-small cell lung cancer. , 2002, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  Icru Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy , 1993 .

[3]  Ursula Nestle,et al.  Target volume definition for 18F-FDG PET-positive lymph nodes in radiotherapy of patients with non-small cell lung cancer , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[4]  Charles C. Watson,et al.  ECAT ART — a continuously rotating PET camera: Performance characteristics, initial clinical studies, and installation considerations in a nuclear medicine department , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  Gábor Székely,et al.  Assessment of 18F PET signals for automatic target volume definition in radiotherapy treatment planning. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  C. Rübe,et al.  2-Deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography in target volume definition for radiotherapy of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2002, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.

[7]  R. Hustinx,et al.  Within-patient variability of (18)F-FDG: standardized uptake values in normal tissues. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Target Volume Definition , 2009 .

[9]  Cyrill Burger,et al.  Radiation treatment planning with an integrated positron emission and computer tomography (PET/CT): a feasibility study. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  C. Rübe,et al.  Comparison of early pulmonary changes in 18FDG-PET and CT after combined radiochemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a study in 15 patients. , 2002, Frontiers of radiation therapy and oncology.

[11]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[12]  John L. Humm,et al.  Radiotherapy treatment planning for patients with non-small cell lung cancer using positron emission tomography (PET). , 2002, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  K Schnabel,et al.  18F-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for the planning of radiotherapy in lung cancer: high impact in patients with atelectasis. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  C. Ling,et al.  Effect of respiratory gating on reducing lung motion artifacts in PET imaging of lung cancer. , 2002, Medical physics.

[16]  W. K. Luk,et al.  Clinical evaluation of single-photon attenuation correction for 3D whole-body PET , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).

[17]  Anne Bol,et al.  Tri-dimensional automatic segmentation of PET volumes based on measured source-to-background ratios: influence of reconstruction algorithms. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[18]  Di Yan,et al.  Defining a radiotherapy target with positron emission tomography. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Curtis B Caldwell,et al.  Can PET provide the 3D extent of tumor motion for individualized internal target volumes? A phantom study of the limitations of CT and the promise of PET. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  U Ruotsalainen,et al.  Influence of the blood glucose concentration on FDG uptake in cancer--a PET study. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  D. Hellwig,et al.  18F-FDG PET for Mediastinal Staging of Lung Cancer: Which SUV Threshold Makes Sense? , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  D. Delbeke,et al.  Evaluation of pulmonary lesions with FDG-PET. Comparison of findings in patients with and without a history of prior malignancy. , 1996, Chest.

[23]  S Grootoonk,et al.  A rotating PET scanner using BGO block detectors: design, performance and applications. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[24]  Jean-François Daisne,et al.  Tumor volume in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison at CT, MR imaging, and FDG PET and validation with surgical specimen. , 2004, Radiology.

[25]  S M Larson,et al.  Segmentation of lung lesion volume by adaptive positron emission tomography image thresholding , 1997, Cancer.

[26]  U. Nestle,et al.  FDG-PET-based radiotherapy planning in lung cancer: optimum breathing protocol and patient positioning--an intraindividual comparison. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  D. Hellwig,et al.  Position of nuclear medicine modalities in the diagnostic workup of cancer patients: lung cancer. , 2004, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of....

[28]  S. Mayor NICE issues guidance for diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  Dan J Kadrmas,et al.  Comparative evaluation of lesion detectability for 6 PET imaging platforms using a highly reproducible whole-body phantom with (22)Na lesions and localization ROC analysis. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[30]  Joos V Lebesque,et al.  Standardised FDG uptake: a prognostic factor for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. , 2005, European journal of cancer.

[31]  Y. Menda,et al.  Evaluation of various corrections to the standardized uptake value for diagnosis of pulmonary malignancy , 2001, Nuclear medicine communications.

[32]  Xavier Geets,et al.  Role of 11-C-methionine positron emission tomography for the delineation of the tumor volume in pharyngo-laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison with FDG-PET and CT. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[33]  S S Gambhir,et al.  A tabulated summary of the FDG PET literature. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[34]  Ursula Nestle,et al.  Practical integration of [18F]-FDG-PET and PET-CT in the planning of radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): the technical basis, ICRU-target volumes, problems, perspectives. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[35]  C. Rübe,et al.  Comparison of different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non-Small cell lung cancer. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[36]  Cyrill Burger,et al.  Automated functional image-guided radiation treatment planning for rectal cancer. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[37]  D. Ball,et al.  Can a mathematical formula help define a radiation target volume using positron emission tomography? In regard to Black et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;60:1272-1282). , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[38]  Branislav Jeremic,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography for Radiation Treatment Planning , 2005, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[39]  Mithat Gonen,et al.  Clinical implications of different image reconstruction parameters for interpretation of whole-body PET studies in cancer patients. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[40]  Jason P Fine,et al.  Influence of reconstruction iterations on 18F-FDG PET/CT standardized uptake values. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[41]  Douglas L. Jones ICRU Report 50—Prescribing, Recording and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy , 1994 .

[42]  E Yorke,et al.  Four-dimensional (4D) PET/CT imaging of the thorax. , 2004, Medical physics.

[43]  Xavier Geets,et al.  Impact of the type of imaging modality on target volumes delineation and dose distribution in pharyngo-laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison between pre- and per-treatment studies. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[44]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  A technique of using gated-CT images to determine internal target volume (ITV) for fractionated stereotactic lung radiotherapy. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.