Offering Multiple Entry-Points into STEM for Young People

Enrollment in the STEM fields (science, technology, engineering and math) is not keeping pace with the need. Recent reports indicate a decrease in the number of graduates from STEM fields and a shortage on the job market. Considering these issues, particular attention has been paid developing innovative methods and tools for improved teaching of STEM themes. This work presents an approach involving multiple entry points for young people to engage in the STEM fields. This approach is manifested in the non-profit association Practical Robotics Institute Austria (PRIA) with its activities designed to fill STEM gaps in the Austrian education system and to bring innovative engagement that cannot be found in the classrooms. Thus, STEM literacy is fostered as well as the development of systems thinking, problem solving, and teamwork skills.

[1]  J. Johnson,et al.  Children, robotics, and education , 2003, Artificial Life and Robotics.

[2]  Robert M. Capraro,et al.  Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education: A longitudinal examination of secondary school intervention , 2014, 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings.

[3]  Laura M. Fisanick.  A Descriptive Study of the Middle School Science Teacher Behavior for Required Student Participation in Science Fair Competitions , 2010 .

[4]  Alvar Saenz Otero,et al.  STEM Education , 2014, Teaching Elementary STEM Education.

[5]  Munir Merdan,et al.  Smartphone driven control of robots for education and research , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Robotics, Biomimetics, Intelligent Computational Systems.

[6]  T. Farmer,et al.  Promoting Interpersonal Competence and Educational Success Through Extracurricular Activity Participation , 2003 .

[7]  David J. Shernoff,et al.  Activities, engagement, and emotion in after-school programs (and elsewhere). , 2005, New directions for youth development.

[8]  Timothy P. Scott,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of National Research: Effects of Teaching Strategies on Student Achievement in Science in the United States , 2007 .

[9]  B. Nagengast,et al.  Effects of a science center outreach lab on school students' achievement - Are student lab visits needed when they teach what students can learn at school? , 2015 .

[10]  Maja J. Mataric,et al.  Materials for Enabling Hands-On Robotics and STEM Education , 2007, AAAI Spring Symposium: Semantic Scientific Knowledge Integration.

[11]  F. Worrell,et al.  A Study of Academically Talented Students’ Participation in Extracurricular Activities , 2005 .

[12]  Bahram Asiabanpour,et al.  A novel engineering outreach to high school education , 2009, 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.

[13]  T. J. Kennedy,et al.  Engaging Students In STEM Education , 2014 .

[14]  V. Braitenberg.  Vehicles, Experiments in Synthetic Psychology , 1984 .

[15]  Edmund A. Marek,et al.  Development of an informal learning opportunities assay , 2001 .

[16]  N. Augustine.  Rising Above The Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future , 2006 .

[17]  Wilfried Lepuschitz,et al.  Flexible development environment for educational robotics , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics.

[18]  Tufan Adiguzel,et al.  STEM Related After-School Program Activities and Associated Outcomes on Student Learning , 2013 .

[19]  Wilfried Lepuschitz,et al.  A Survey on Standards and Ontologies for Process Automation , 2015, HoloMAS.

[20]  R. Keith Sawyer,et al.  Optimising Learning Implications of Learning Sciences Research , 2008 .

[21]  L. Rennie,et al.  The roles of the formal and informal sectors in the provision of effective science education , 2010 .