The weighted sum preferred levels of performances approach to solving problems in human resources management

In the modern market and in competitive business conditions, human resources are the basis of achieving a long-term success and the key resource of competitive advantage. Therefore, employees represent one of the main strategic resources of an organization. The process of the recruitment and selection of personnel plays an extremely important role in human resources management, which tends to provide an organization with motivated and competent personnel. Therefore, the main objective of the paper is to present an approach to solving problems in human resource management, i.e. personnel selection, based on a recently developed multiple-criteria decision making method. The methodology used in the paper is based on the Weighted Sum Preferred Levels of Performances (WS PLP) method adapted for the purpose of an analysis based on decision-makers' preferred levels of performances. The weights of the criteria are determined by using the Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis method (the SWARA method). The final ranking order is established by using the weighted averaging operator. Usefulness and efficiency of the proposed approach are considered in the numerical example for the selection of the HR manager. As a result, WS PLP approach can be used for solving personnel selection problems. The proposed multiple-criteria decision-making based approach is easy to use, effective, applicable and adaptable, depending on the goal we want to achieve. In order to solve problems in other areas, the proposed approach can be easily modified.

[1]  Cheng Lin,et al.  An intelligent sampling approach for metamodel-based multi-objective optimization with guidance of the adaptive weighted-sum method , 2018 .

[2]  S. Bouallègue,et al.  A New Method , 2021, Black Power and the American Myth.

[3]  Ashkan Hafezalkotob,et al.  Interval target-based VIKOR method supported on interval distance and preference degree for machine selection , 2018, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[4]  A. Bánociová,et al.  Active Labour Market Policies of Selected European Countries and Their Competitiveness , 2017 .

[5]  Younes Noorollahi,et al.  Potential survey of photovoltaic power plants using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method in Iran , 2017 .

[6]  Norhazilan Md Noor,et al.  Hybrid SWARA-COPRAS method for risk assessment in deep foundation excavation project: an Iranian case study , 2017 .

[7]  Živan Živković,et al.  Prioritizing Strategic Goals in Higher Education Organizations by Using a SWOT–PROMETHEE/GAIA–GDSS Model , 2017 .

[8]  H. Gitinavard,et al.  A soft computing based-modified ELECTRE model for renewable energy policy selection with unknown information , 2017 .

[9]  S. Prabhu,et al.  Analysis of multi objective optimisation using TOPSIS method in EDM process with CNT infused copper electrode , 2017 .

[10]  D. Nagesh Kumar,et al.  Ranking of CMIP5-based global climate models for India using compromise programming , 2017, Theoretical and Applied Climatology.

[11]  J. Mayfield,et al.  Talent development for top leaders: three HR initiatives for competitive advantage , 2016 .

[12]  Kayvan Salehi,et al.  An Integrated Approach of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy VIKOR for Personnel Selection Problem , 2016 .

[13]  Mehdi Keshavarz Ghorabaee,et al.  A NEW COMBINATIVE DISTANCE-BASED ASSESSMENT(CODAS) METHOD FOR MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING , 2016 .

[14]  Dragisa Stanujkic,et al.  The Framework for the Selection of Personnel Based on the SWARA and ARAS Methods Under Uncertainties , 2016, Informatica.

[15]  Dragisa Stanujkic,et al.  A Modified Weighted Sum Method Based on the Decision- maker’s Preferred Levels of Performances , 2015 .

[16]  Dragisa Stanujkic,et al.  Selection of candidates in the mining industry based on the application of the SWARA and the MULTIMOORA methods , 2015 .

[17]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Personnel Selection Using Interval 2‐Tuple Linguistic VIKOR Method , 2015 .

[18]  A. Bakker,et al.  Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage , 2015 .

[19]  Kuei-Lun Chang,et al.  The Use of a Hybrid MCDM Model for Public Relations Personnel Selection , 2015, Informatica.

[20]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) , 2015, Informatica.

[21]  M. Z. Ahmad,et al.  Hamming Distance Method with Subjective and Objective Weights for Personnel Selection , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[22]  Dragisa Stanujkic,et al.  Comparative analysis of some prominent MCDM methods: A case of ranking Serbian banks , 2013 .

[23]  Mehmet Kabak,et al.  A Fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP Based Multi Criteria Decision Making Approach for Personnel Selection , 2013, J. Multiple Valued Log. Soft Comput..

[24]  Dragisa Stanujkic,et al.  A Multi-Attribute Decision Making Model Based on Distance from Decision Maker's Preferences , 2013, Informatica.

[25]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Optimization of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment , 2012 .

[26]  Mohamed F. El-Santawy A VIKOR Method for Solving Personnel Training Selection Problem , 2012 .

[27]  Carmen Medina-López,et al.  Is worker commitment necessary for achieving competitive advantage and customer satisfaction when companies use HRM and TQM practices , 2012 .

[28]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Project management by multimoora as an instrument for transition economies , 2010 .

[29]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (Swara) , 2010 .

[30]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision‐making , 2010 .

[31]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  A fuzzy MCDM approach for personnel selection , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[32]  Alireza Afshari,et al.  Simple Additive Weighting approach to Personnel Selection problem , 2010 .

[33]  Carol T. Kulik,et al.  The Multiple-Category Problem: Category Activation and Inhibition in the Hiring Process , 2007 .

[34]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  Strategic HRM and Organizational Behavior: Integrating Multiple Levels of Analysis , 2006 .

[35]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy , 2006 .

[36]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Introduction to Multi-Criteria Decision Making and the Evidential Reasoning Approach , 2004 .

[37]  P. Boxall,et al.  Strategy and Human Resource Management , 2002 .

[38]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2001 .

[39]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[40]  D. Borst,et al.  Human resource management. , 2001, Occupational medicine.

[41]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Human resources and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based perspective , 1994 .

[42]  David A. DeCenzo,et al.  Fundamentals of Human Resource Management , 1993 .

[43]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[44]  B. Roy THE OUTRANKING APPROACH AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF ELECTRE METHODS , 1991 .

[45]  Evangelos Triantaphyllou,et al.  An examination of the effectiveness of multi-dimensional decision-making methods: A decision-making paradox , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[46]  P. Vincke,et al.  Note-A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making , 1985 .

[47]  P. Vincke,et al.  Preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations , 1985 .

[48]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  A PREFERENCE RANKING ORGANIZATION METHOD , 1985 .

[49]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[50]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[51]  G G Blaker,et al.  Human resources. , 2019, Hospitals.

[52]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Letter to the Editor - Additive Utilities with Incomplete Product Sets: Application to Priorities and Assignments , 1967, Oper. Res..

[53]  John C. Harsanyi,et al.  Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility , 1955, Journal of Political Economy.