Judgements of overall seating comfort in dynamic conditions sometimes correlate better with the static characteristics of a seat than with measures of the dynamic environment. This study developed qualitative models of overall seat discomfort to include both static and dynamic seat characteristics. A dynamic factor that reflected how vibration discomfort increased as vibration magnitude increased was combined with a static seat factor which reflected seating comfort without vibration. The ability of the model to predict the relative and overall importance of dynamic and static seat characteristics on comfort was tested in two experiments. A paired comparison experiment, using four polyurethane foam cushions (50, 70, 100, 120 mm thick), provided different static and dynamic comfort when 12 subjects were exposed to one-third octave band random vertical vibration with centre frequencies of 2.5 and 5.5 Hz, at magnitudes of 0.00, 0.25 and 0.50 m.s-2 rms measured beneath the foam samples. Subject judgements of the relative discomfort of the different conditions depended on both static and dynamic characteristics in a manner consistent with the model. The effect of static and dynamic seat factors on overall seat discomfort was investigated by magnitude estimation using three foam cushions (of different hardness) and a rigid wooden seat at six vibration magnitudes with 20 subjects. Static seat factors (i.e. cushion stiffness) affected the manner in which vibration influenced the overall discomfort: cushions with lower stiffness were more comfortable and more sensitive to changes in vibration magnitude than those with higher stiffness. The experiments confirm that judgements of overall seat discomfort can be affected by both the static and dynamic characteristics of a seat, with the effect depending on vibration magnitude: when vibration magnitude was low, discomfort was dominated by static seat factors; as the vibration magnitude increased, discomfort became dominated by dynamic factors.
[1]
M J Griffin,et al.
The evaluation of discomfort produced by multiple frequency whole-body vibration.
,
1977,
Ergonomics.
[2]
Jack D. Leatherwood.
Human discomfort response to noise combined with vertical vibration
,
1979
.
[3]
Sherman A. Clevenson,et al.
Evaluation of Ride Quality Prediction Methods for Helicopter Interior Noise and Vibration Environments
,
1984
.
[4]
M. J. Griffin,et al.
The dynamic characteristics of automobile seats with human occupants
,
1978
.
[5]
M J Griffin,et al.
The relative importance of noise and vibration from railways.
,
1990,
Applied ergonomics.
[6]
Richard R. Thompson,et al.
THE DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF AUTOMOBILE SEATS WITH HUMAN OCCUPANTS
,
1977
.
[7]
L. C. Fothehgul,et al.
The Subjective Magnitude of Whole-Body Vibration
,
1977
.
[8]
H.-K. Jang,et al.
The effect of phase of differential vertical vibration at the seat and feet on discomfort
,
1999
.
[9]
Masaaki Katsumata,et al.
Evaluation of Seating Comfort
,
1982
.
[10]
M J Griffin,et al.
Predicting the subjective response to nonsteady vibration based on the summation of subjective magnitude.
,
1984,
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11]
Michael J. Griffin,et al.
The annoyance caused by simultaneous noise and vibration from railways
,
1991
.