Micro- and Macro-Dynamics of Open Innovation with a Quadruple-Helix Model

This paper explores how sustainability can be achieved through open innovation in the current 4th industrial revolution. Through a literature and practice review, we identify micro- and macro-dynamics of open innovation in addition to the dynamic roles of industry, government, university, and society. In particular, the industry continuously adopts open platforms to create and maintain ecosystem innovation. The government’s role has changed from regulation control toward facilitation. Universities have become proactively engaged in multiple areas, from technology transfer to knowledge co-creation. Societies and customers have started to form new concepts, R&D, and commercialization, resulting in a shared economy. Based on the analysis, we propose a conceptual framework to understand open innovation micro- and macro-dynamics with a quadruple-helix model for social, environmental, economic, cultural, policy, and knowledge sustainability. Furthermore, this provides an overview of the special issue, “Sustainability of Economy, Society, and Environment in the 4th Industrial Revolution”, which aims to respond to the 4th industrial revolution in terms of open innovation and cyber-physics from manufacturing to the service industry.

[1]  J. F. Moore,et al.  Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[2]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[3]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[4]  J. Elkington Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development , 1994 .

[5]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The Triple Helix -- University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development , 1995 .

[6]  A. Elzinga The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1997 .

[7]  Philip Cooke,et al.  Regional Systems of Innovation: An Evolutionary Perspective , 1998 .

[8]  John T. Scott,et al.  Barriers Inhibiting Industry from Partnering with Universities: Evidence from the Advanced Technology Program , 2000 .

[9]  Christian Rammer,et al.  Benchmarking industry—science relations: the role of framework conditions , 2001 .

[10]  A. Salter,et al.  The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review , 2001 .

[11]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  The second academic revolution and the rise of entrepreneurial science , 2001, IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag..

[12]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States , 2002 .

[13]  M. Fischer,et al.  Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants , 2002 .

[14]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[15]  R. Narula R&D Collaboration by SMEs: new opportunities and limitations in the face of globalisation , 2004 .

[16]  H. Chesbrough Managing Open Innovation , 2004 .

[17]  Andrew Davies,et al.  The Business of Projects: Managing Innovation in Complex Products and Systems , 2005 .

[18]  M. Dodgson,et al.  The Role of Technology in the Shift Towards Open Innovation: The Case of Procter & Gamble , 2006 .

[19]  Myriam Cloodt,et al.  Open innovation in value networks , 2006 .

[20]  Geoff Mulgan,et al.  The Process of Social Innovation , 2006, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization.

[21]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters : a comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe, and Asia , 2006 .

[22]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The scientometrics of a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations (Introduction to the topical issue) , 2007, Scientometrics.

[23]  Jong de Jpj,et al.  Open innovation in SMEs : trends, motives and management challenges , 2009 .

[24]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[25]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation and Strategy , 2007 .

[26]  M. Perkmann,et al.  University Industry Relationships and Open Innovation: Towards a Research Agenda , 2007 .

[27]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Open Innovation in Practice: An Analysis of Strategic Approaches to Technology Transactions , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[28]  B. Weel,et al.  Innovation Policy in Europe Measurement and Strategy , 2008 .

[29]  R. Kozhikode,et al.  Developing New Innovation Models: Shifts in the Innovation Landscapes in Emerging Economies and Implications for Global R & D Management , 2009 .

[30]  Improving the Indigenous Innovation Capabilities in Chinese Enterprises through Open Innovation , 2009 .

[31]  O. Gassmann,et al.  The Future of Open Innovation , 2010 .

[32]  Irina Savitskaya,et al.  Barriers to Open Innovation: Case China , 2010 .

[33]  Morgan Meyer The Rise of the Knowledge Broker , 2010 .

[34]  Sungjoon Lee,et al.  Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model , 2010 .

[35]  Gohar Feroz Khan,et al.  Editorial: Triple Helix and innovation in Asia using scientometrics, webometrics, and informetrics , 2011, Scientometrics.

[36]  Xiaolan Fu,et al.  Open innovation in China: policies and practices , 2011 .

[37]  R. V. Schomberg Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation , 2011 .

[38]  Michael Idelchik,et al.  GE's Open Collaboration Model , 2012 .

[39]  V. Parida,et al.  Inbound Open Innovation Activities in High‐Tech SMEs: The Impact on Innovation Performance , 2012 .

[40]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  Open innovation in the public sector of leading countries , 2012 .

[41]  S. Kassicieh,et al.  Using the quadruple helix to design strategies for the green economy , 2013 .

[42]  R. Kapoor,et al.  Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments , 2013 .

[43]  J. Stilgoe,et al.  Developing a framework for responsible innovation* , 2013, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.

[44]  Sverker Alänge,et al.  A corporate system for continuous innovation: the case of Google Inc. , 2013 .

[45]  Han Woo Park,et al.  Transition from the Triple Helix to N-Tuple Helices? An interview with Elias G. Carayannis and David F. J. Campbell , 2013, Scientometrics.

[46]  R. Belk You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online , 2014 .

[47]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  A Fad or a Phenomenon?: The Adoption of Open Innovation Practices in Large Firms , 2014 .

[48]  Marian Garcia Martinez,et al.  Social Media: A Tool for Open Innovation , 2014 .

[49]  Joon-ho Kim,et al.  Study on CEO characteristics for management of public art performance centers , 2015 .

[50]  Tamotsu Shibata,et al.  Demand articulation in the open-innovation paradigm , 2015 .

[51]  J. Yun How do we conquer the growth limits of capitalism? Schumpeterian Dynamics of Open Innovation , 2015 .

[52]  Mirko Guaralda,et al.  Public space design of knowledge and innovation spaces: learnings from Kelvin Grove Urban Village, Brisbane , 2015 .

[53]  J. Yun,et al.  Analysing and simulating the effects of open innovation policies: Application of the results to Cambodia , 2015 .

[54]  Kwangho Jung,et al.  A systematic review of RFID applications and diffusion: key areas and public policy issues , 2015, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[55]  E. Baraldi,et al.  Targeting Academic Engagement in Open Innovation: Tools, Effects and Challenges for University Management , 2015 .

[56]  Valentina Della Corte,et al.  Customer involvement through social media: the cases of some telecommunication firms , 2015 .

[57]  Thierry Rayna,et al.  University-Industry Knowledge Exchange: An Exploratory Study of Open Innovation in UK Universities , 2015 .

[58]  Jeonghwan Jeon,et al.  Historical review on the patterns of open innovation at the national level: the case of the roman period , 2015 .

[59]  Junghee Han,et al.  Platform business Eco-model evolution: case study on KakaoTalk in Korea , 2015 .

[60]  Nataļja Lāce,et al.  The scope of coaching in the context of organizational change , 2016 .

[61]  Christian Voegtlin,et al.  Responsible Innovation and the Innovation of Responsibility: Governing Sustainable Development in a Globalized World , 2017 .

[62]  Il-Hyung Lee,et al.  Valuations using royalty data in the life sciences area—focused on anticancer and cardiovascular therapies , 2016 .

[63]  Maha Mohammed Yusr Innovation capability and its role in enhancing the relationship between TQM practices and innovation performance , 2016 .

[64]  Philip Cooke,et al.  The virtues of variety in regional innovation systems and entrepreneurial ecosystems , 2016 .

[65]  JinHyo Joseph Yun,et al.  How User Entrepreneurs Succeed: The Role of Entrepreneur’s Caliber and Networking Ability in Korean User Entrepreneurship , 2016 .

[66]  Hwan-Jin Nho Research ethics education in Korea for overcoming culture and value system differences , 2016 .

[67]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  An open letter to Mr. Secretary general of the united nations to propose setting up global standards for conquering growth limits of capitalism , 2016 .

[68]  Vivek Kumar,et al.  Theory of open inclusive innovation for reciprocal, responsive and respectful outcomes: coping creatively with climatic and institutional risks , 2016 .

[69]  JinHyo Joseph Yun,et al.  Open Innovation to Business Model , 2016 .

[70]  Kyungbae Park,et al.  Dynamics from open innovation to evolutionary change , 2016 .

[71]  Esteve Almirall,et al.  The City as a Lab , 2016 .

[72]  Anna Svirina,et al.  Implementing open innovation concept in social business , 2016 .

[73]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  “Open innovation” and “triple helix” models of innovation: can synergy in innovation systems be measured? , 2016, ArXiv.

[74]  Sun ah Kim,et al.  Student customized creative education model based on open innovation , 2017 .

[75]  Tomoatsu Shibata,et al.  Beyond fusion towards IoT by way of open innovation: an investigation based on the Japanese machine tool industry 1975-2015 , 2017 .

[76]  J. Yun,et al.  Collectivism, Individualism and Open Innovation: Introduction to the Special Issue on ‘Technology, Open Innovation, Markets and Complexity’ , 2017 .

[77]  Xiaofei Zhao,et al.  Can Government Policies Drive Open Innovation Type Platforms? Ideas from the MSC Malaysia Flagship Applications , 2017 .

[78]  P. Cooke A ground-up “Quaternary” innovation strategy for South Korea using entrepreneurial ecosystem platforms , 2017, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[79]  Hang Sik Park,et al.  Technology convergence, open innovation, and dynamic economy , 2017 .

[80]  E. Park,et al.  The effect of Hallyu on tourism in Korea , 2017 .

[81]  Philip Cooke,et al.  Complex spaces: global innovation networks & territorial innovation systems in information & communication technologies , 2017 .

[82]  A. Agnihotri Responsible innovation at the bottom of the pyramid , 2017 .

[83]  Rogério Cid Bastos,et al.  Sustainable development of smart cities: a systematic review of the literature , 2017 .

[84]  L. Leydesdorff Synergy in Knowledge-Based Innovation Systems at National and Regional Levels: The Triple-Helix Model and the Fourth Industrial Revolution , 2018 .

[85]  Jakob Pohlisch,et al.  Triggers of Collaborative Innovation in Online User Communities , 2018, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[86]  J. Yun,et al.  Architectural Design and Open Innovation Symbiosis: Insights from Research Campuses, Manufacturing Systems, and Innovation Districts , 2018, Sustainability.

[87]  Evangelos Grigoroudis,et al.  The Ecosystem as Helix: An Exploratory Theory‐Building Study of Regional Co‐Opetitive Entrepreneurial Ecosystems as Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Innovation Models , 2018 .

[88]  J. Yun,et al.  Benefits and Costs of Closed Innovation Strategy: Analysis of Samsung’s Galaxy Note 7 Explosion and Withdrawal Scandal , 2018, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[89]  Y. Moon,et al.  Relation of R&D expense to turnover and number of listed companies in all industrial fields , 2018 .

[90]  D. Samson,et al.  Crowdsourcing: A contemporary form of project management with linkages to open innovation and novel operations , 2018 .

[91]  Fumio Kodama,et al.  Learning Mode and Strategic Concept for the 4th Industrial Revolution , 2018, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[92]  Tan Yigitcanlar,et al.  Knowledge-based, smart and sustainable cities: a provocation for a conceptual framework , 2018 .

[93]  B. Becker,et al.  Open innovation concept: integrating universities and business in digital age , 2018 .

[94]  B. Hwang,et al.  Efficiency Analysis of the Royalty System from the Perspective of Open Innovation , 2018, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[95]  Mario Tani,et al.  The System Thinking Perspective in the Open-Innovation Research: A Systematic Review , 2018, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[96]  J. Yun,et al.  Entrepreneurial cyclical dynamics of open innovation , 2018, Journal of Evolutionary Economics.

[97]  Daniel Guffarth,et al.  Patterns of Learning in Dynamic Technological System Lifecycles—What Automotive Managers Can Learn from the Aerospace Industry? , 2018, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[98]  A. Gawer,et al.  Towards a Theory of Ecosystems , 2018, Strategic Management Journal.

[99]  A. Zuruzi,et al.  Sustaining Innovation: Creativity among Employees of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and Students in Higher Education Institutions in Brunei Darussalam , 2019, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[100]  W. Slany,et al.  Open Principles in New Business Models for Information Systems , 2019, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[101]  Philip Cooke,et al.  World Turned Upside Down: Entrepreneurial Decline, Its Reluctant Myths and Troubling Realities , 2019, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[102]  Xiaojing Huang,et al.  The Impact of Local Government Policy on Innovation Ecosystem in Knowledge Resource Scarce Region: Case Study of Changzhou, China , 2019, Science, Technology and Society.

[103]  JinHyo Joseph Yun,et al.  The role of a business model in market growth: The difference between the converted industry and the emerging industry , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[104]  Andrejs Čirjevskis The Role of Dynamic Capabilities as Drivers of Business Model Innovation in Mergers and Acquisitions of Technology-Advanced Firms , 2019, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[105]  Min-Ren Yan,et al.  Targeting Open Market with Strategic Business Innovations: A Case Study of Growth Dynamics in Essential Oil and Aromatherapy Industry , 2019, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.

[106]  Junic Kim,et al.  The Effects of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Environmental Uncertainty on Korean Technology Firms’ R&D Investment , 2019, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.