A subfemtotesla multichannel atomic magnetometer

The magnetic field is one of the most fundamental and ubiquitous physical observables, carrying information about all electromagnetic phenomena. For the past 30 years, superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) operating at 4 K have been unchallenged as ultrahigh-sensitivity magnetic field detectors, with a sensitivity reaching down to 1 fT Hz-1/2 (1 fT = 10-15 T). They have enabled, for example, mapping of the magnetic fields produced by the brain, and localization of the underlying electrical activity (magnetoencephalography). Atomic magnetometers, based on detection of Larmor spin precession of optically pumped atoms, have approached similar levels of sensitivity using large measurement volumes, but have much lower sensitivity in the more compact designs required for magnetic imaging applications. Higher sensitivity and spatial resolution combined with non-cryogenic operation of atomic magnetometers would enable new applications, including the possibility of mapping non-invasively the cortical modules in the brain. Here we describe a new spin-exchange relaxation-free (SERF) atomic magnetometer, and demonstrate magnetic field sensitivity of 0.54 fT Hz-1/2 with a measurement volume of only 0.3 cm3. Theoretical analysis shows that fundamental sensitivity limits of this device are below 0.01 fT Hz-1/2. We also demonstrate simple multichannel operation of the magnetometer, and localization of magnetic field sources with a resolution of 2 mm.

[1]  Dietmar Drung,et al.  Improved direct-coupled dc SQUID read-out electronics with automatic bias voltage tuning , 2001 .

[2]  D. Ts'o,et al.  Functional organization of primate visual cortex revealed by high resolution optical imaging. , 1990, Science.

[3]  Valeriy V. Yashchuk,et al.  Nonlinear Magneto-optic Effects with Ultranarrow Widths , 1998 .

[4]  J. R. Claycomb,et al.  PRACTICAL SQUID INSTRUMENT FOR NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING , 1997 .

[5]  H. Meyer,et al.  Low-drift broadband directly coupled dc SQUID read-out electronics , 2002 .

[6]  Kirtley,et al.  Phase-sensitive evidence for d-wave pairing symmetry in electron-doped cuprate superconductors , 2000, Physical review letters.

[7]  G. Harry,et al.  Two-stage superconducting-quantum-interference-device amplifier in a high-Q gravitational wave transducer , 1999, cond-mat/9910337.

[8]  S. Knappe,et al.  An all-optical, high-sensitivity magnetic gradiometer , 2002 .

[9]  Y. Greenberg,et al.  Application of superconducting quantum interference devices to nuclear magnetic resonance , 1998 .

[10]  M. Romalis,et al.  High-sensitivity atomic magnetometer unaffected by spin-exchange relaxation. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[11]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[12]  S. Haroche,et al.  Detection of very weak magnetic fields (10−9gauss) by 87Rb zero-field level crossing resonances , 1969 .

[13]  T. R. Clem Superconducting Magnetic Gradiometers For Underwater Target Detection , 1998 .

[14]  Harold Weinstock,et al.  SQUID sensors : fundamentals, fabrication, and applications , 1996 .

[15]  G. Romani,et al.  Magnetoencephalography - a noninvasive brain imaging method with 1 ms time resolution , 2001 .

[16]  Andrew C. Tam,et al.  Effect of rapid spin exchange on the magnetic-resonance spectrum of alkali vapors , 1977 .

[17]  E. B. Alexandrov,et al.  =================================================================== Double-resonance atomic magnetometers: from gas discharge to laser pumping. , 1996 .

[18]  Valeriy V. Yashchuk,et al.  Sensitive Magnetometry based on Nonlinear Magneto-Optical Rotation , 2000 .

[19]  T. Poutanen,et al.  Magnetic field fluctuations arising from thermal motion of electric charge in conductors , 1984 .

[20]  A. E. Ivanov,et al.  Laser pumping in the scheme of an Mx-magnetometer , 1995 .

[21]  Heon-Jin Choi,et al.  Single-crystal gallium nitride nanotubes , 2003, Nature.

[22]  J. Zimmerman,et al.  Design and Operation of Stable rf‐Biased Superconducting Point‐Contact Quantum Devices, and a Note on the Properties of Perfectly Clean Metal Contacts , 1970 .

[23]  F. Varela,et al.  Perception's shadow: long-distance synchronization of human brain activity , 1999, Nature.

[24]  W. Gawlik,et al.  Resonant nonlinear magneto-optical effects in atoms , 2002, physics/0203077.

[25]  Jukka Nenonen,et al.  Thermal Noise in Biomagnetic Measurements , 1993 .

[26]  Akihiko Kandori,et al.  Cancellation technique of external noise inside a magnetically shielded room used for biomagnetic measurements , 2000 .

[27]  Joseph L. Kirschvink,et al.  Paleomagnetic Evidence of a Low-Temperature Origin of Carbonate in the Martian Meteorite ALH84001 , 1997, Science.

[28]  Robert McDermott,et al.  Liquid-State NMR and Scalar Couplings in Microtesla Magnetic Fields , 2002, Science.