Multivariate aspects of model uncertainty analysis: tools for sensitivity analysis and calibration

Abstract This paper deals with the analysis of complex environmental models. It is argued that such models are needed to predict environmental change outside current conditions. The use of these models poses some hard questions about their validity, and it is concluded that they should be termed useful rather than scientific in the strict sense. The complexity of the models arises from the high number of input-parameters and output variables. The paper proposes statistical and visualization techniques to explore the relations between the two. Results of a sensitivity analysis can be grouped in order to identify different modes of model behaviour. Within each mode an ordering of sensitivity coefficients is possible. In model calibration there is often a trade-off in the fit to various model output. Quantification of these relations can help in a proper choice of weights and serve as a tool in model analysis. A common feature of the techniques proposed in this paper is that they recognize modelling as a series of judgements to be made by the modeller. By providing more insight into this process these choices can be made more explicit, less arbitrary and more reproducible.

[1]  Eligius M. T. Hendrix,et al.  A method for robust calibration of ecological models under different types of uncertainty , 1994 .

[2]  SMOES: a simulation model for the Oosterschelde ecosystem , 1994 .

[3]  M. B. Beck Understanding Uncertain Environmental Systems , 1994 .

[4]  M. B. Beck,et al.  Water quality modeling: A review of the analysis of uncertainty , 1987 .

[5]  G. Evans,et al.  Towards a model of ocean biogeochemical processes , 1993 .

[6]  S. Pacala,et al.  Forest models defined by field measurements : Estimation, error analysis and dynamics , 1996 .

[7]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1966 .

[8]  P. H. M. Janssen,et al.  Assessing Sensitivities and Uncertainties in Models: A Critical Evaluation , 1994 .

[9]  H. Woxniakowski Information-Based Complexity , 1988 .

[10]  C. T. Wit,et al.  Critical evaluation of systems analysis in ecosystems research and management , 1977 .

[11]  O. Klepper,et al.  A model of carbon flows in relation to macrobenthic food supply in the Oosterschelde estuary (S.W. Netherlands) , 1989 .

[12]  O. Klepper,et al.  A sensitivity study of the effect of global change on ocean carbon uptake , 1995 .

[13]  P. Yu Multiple criteria decision making: five basic concepts , 1989 .

[14]  O. Klepper Modelling the oceanic food web using a quasi steady-state approach , 1995 .

[15]  A A Berryman,et al.  Are ecological systems chaotic - And if not, why not? , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  Eligius M. T. Hendrix,et al.  A comparison of algorithms for global characterization of confidence regions for nonlinear models , 1994 .

[17]  Wout Slob,et al.  Diagnosis of Model Applicability by Identification of Incompatible Data Sets Illustrated on a Pharmacokinetic Model for Dioxins in Mammals , 1994 .

[18]  P. S. C. Heuberger,et al.  UNCSAM: A Software Tool for Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of Mathematical Models , 1994 .

[19]  O. Klepper,et al.  A procedure to reduce parameter uncertainty for complex models by comparison with real system output illustrated on a potato growth model , 1991 .

[20]  S. G. Tzafestas,et al.  Methodology in Systems Modelling and Simulation , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.