The Predictive Value of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography in Assessment of Brain Arteriovenous Malformation Obliteration after Radiosurgery

This article addresses a common clinical problem: the MRA assessment of treatment effects on AVMs. The authors looked at the utility of T2 and time-of-flight MRA images in 120 pre- and postradiosurgery AVMs; 55 of these had been previously embolized. They compared the MRI findings with those from DSA and discovered that both MR sequences performed poorly when the residual nidus was less than 10 mm in size. Therefore, DSA is highly recommended to make the diagnosis of complete AVM obliteration. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of radiosurgery of bAVMs is complete angiographic obliteration of its nidus. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of 1.5T T2-weighted MR imaging and TOF-MRA images for detecting nidus obliteration after radiosurgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The pre- and postradiosurgery MR images and DSA images from 120 patients who were radiosurgically treated for a bAVM were re-evaluated by 2 observers for patency of the nidus (preradiosurgery) and obliteration (postradiosurgery: final follow-up MR imaging), by using a 3-point scale of confidence. Consensus reading of the DSA after radiosurgery was considered the criterion standard for obliteration. Sensitivity, specificity, PPVs, and NPVs, and overall diagnostic performance by using ROC were determined. RESULTS: Mean bAVM volume during radiosurgery was 3.4 mL (95% CI, 2.6–4.3 mL). Sixty-six patients (55%) had undergone previous endovascular embolization. The mean intervals between radiosurgery and follow-up MR imaging and for DSA, respectively, were 35.6 months (95% CI, 32.3–38.9 months) and 42.1 months (95% CI, 40.3–44.0 months). With ROC, an area under curve of 0.81–0.83 was found. PPVs and NPVs of final follow-up MR imaging for definitive obliteration varied between 0.85 and 0.95 and 0.55 and 0.62. An average false-positive rate, meaning overestimation of nidus obliteration, of 0.08 and an average false-negative rate, meaning underestimation of nidus obliteration of 0.48, were found. CONCLUSIONS: MRA is insufficient to diagnose obliteration in the follow-up of bAVMs after radiosurgery. A remaining nidus diameter <10 mm seems to be the major limiting factor for reliable assessment of obliteration. We highly recommend follow-up DSA for definitive diagnosis of complete obliteration.

[1]  J. Finn,et al.  Intracranial arteriovenous malformations: quantitative analysis of magnitude contrast MR angiography versus gradient-echo MR imaging versus conventional angiography. , 1995, Radiology.

[2]  B. K. Stewart,et al.  Radiation dose and excess risk of cancer in children undergoing neuroangiography. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  W. Vandertop,et al.  EXTENSIVE WHITE MATTER CHANGES AFTER STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY FOR BRAIN ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS: A PROGNOSTIC SIGN FOR OBLITERATION? , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[4]  W. Vandertop,et al.  Clinical outcome after repeated radiosurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  J. Sheehan,et al.  Subtotal obliteration of cerebral arteriovenous malformations after gamma knife surgery. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  Detection of Residual Brain Arteriovenous Malformations after Radiosurgery: Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Three-Dimensional Time of Flight MR Angiography at 3.0 Tesla , 2009, Korean journal of radiology.

[7]  N. Hoggard Conventional digital subtraction x-ray angiography versus magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of carotid disease: patient satisfaction and preferences. , 2004, Clinical radiology.

[8]  S. Vaishya,et al.  Gamma knife radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations of basal ganglia, thalamus and brainstem—a retrospective study comparing the results with that for AVMs at other intracranial locations , 2009, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[9]  Edward A M Duckworth,et al.  Completion angiography for surgically treated cerebral aneurysms: An economic analysis - Commentary , 2007 .

[10]  T. Kirino,et al.  The risk of hemorrhage after radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  H. Thomsen,et al.  Adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media , 2001, European Radiology.

[12]  C R Bird,et al.  Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. , 1994, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[13]  Nicolas Reyns,et al.  Intracranial arteriovenous malformation: time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography with combination of parallel imaging, keyhole acquisition, and k-space sampling techniques at 1.5 T. , 2008, Radiology.

[14]  H. Kauczor,et al.  High-contrast computed tomographic angiography better detects residual intracranial arteriovenous malformations in long-term follow-up after radiotherapy than 1.5-tesla time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography , 2010, Acta radiologica.

[15]  Paul M. Parizel,et al.  MR angiography of the intracranial vessels: technical aspects and clinical applications , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[16]  Horst Urbach,et al.  Cerebral arteriovenous malformation: Spetzler-Martin classification at subsecond-temporal-resolution four-dimensional MR angiography compared with that at DSA. , 2008, Radiology.

[17]  J. Flickinger,et al.  MODIFICATION OF THE RADIOSURGERY‐BASED ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATION GRADING SYSTEM , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[18]  M. Koltzenburg,et al.  Silent embolism in diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: a prospective study , 1999, The Lancet.

[19]  G Forbes,et al.  Complications of cerebral angiography: prospective assessment of risk. , 1983, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  A. Fox,et al.  Clinical events following neuroangiography: a prospective study. , 1987, Stroke.

[21]  Charles E Metz,et al.  ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature , 2008, Radiological physics and technology.

[22]  C. Schaller,et al.  Arteriovenous malformations and magnetic resonance imaging. , 1997, Journal of neurosurgery.

[23]  C. Oppenheim,et al.  Radiosurgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: is an early angiogram needed? , 1999, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[24]  F. Lagerwaard,et al.  Brain arteriovenous malformations: from diagnosis to treatment. , 2011, Journal of neurosurgical sciences.

[25]  J. Douglas,et al.  Treatment of arteriovenous malformations using Gamma Knife surgery: the experience at the University of Washington from 2000 to 2005. , 2008, Journal of neurosurgery.

[26]  L. Lunsford,et al.  Modern Stereotactic Neurosurgery , 1988, Topics in neurological surgery.

[27]  R. Friedlander Clinical practice. Arteriovenous malformations of the brain. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  K. Yamanaka,et al.  Prospective analysis of complications of catheter cerebral angiography in the digital subtraction angiography and magnetic resonance era. , 1998, Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

[29]  J. Finn,et al.  Assessment of Craniospinal Arteriovenous Malformations at 3T with Highly Temporally and Highly Spatially Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[30]  C. Avezaat,et al.  Sagittal sinus occlusion, caused by an overlying depressed cranial fracture, presenting with late signs and symptoms of intracranial hypertension: case report. , 1996, Neurosurgery.

[31]  S. Cole,et al.  Biologic Effects of 3 Tesla (T) MR Imaging Comparing Traditional 1.5 T and 0.6 T in 1023 Consecutive Outpatients , 2007, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[32]  O. Abe,et al.  Assessment of arteriovenous malformations with 3-Tesla time-resolved, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography. , 2009, Journal of neurosurgery.

[33]  J. C. Baayen,et al.  Radiosurgery of brain arteriovenous malformations in children , 2008, Journal of Neurology.

[34]  R F Spetzler,et al.  Relationship of perfusion pressure and size to risk of hemorrhage from arteriovenous malformations. , 1992, Journal of neurosurgery.

[35]  Mark G. Burnett,et al.  COMPLETION ANGIOGRAPHY FOR SURGICALLY TREATED CEREBRAL ANEURYSMS: AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS , 2007, Neurosurgery.

[36]  G. Duckwiler,et al.  Assessment of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations With High Temporal and Spatial Resolution Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography: A Review From Protocol to Clinical Application , 2008, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[37]  Ellen Charkot,et al.  Pediatric patient surface doses in neuroangiography , 2005, Pediatric Radiology.

[38]  C. Romanowski,et al.  Complications of cerebral angiography: a prospective analysis of 2,924 consecutive procedures , 2007, Neuroradiology.

[39]  F. Barkhof,et al.  Delineation of brain AVMs on MR-Angiography for the purpose of stereotactic radiosurgery. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[40]  J. Gillard,et al.  Conventional digital subtraction x-ray angiography versus magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of carotid disease: patient satisfaction and preferences. , 2004, Clinical radiology.

[41]  S. Albayram,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MR 3D angiography in the assessment of brain AVMs. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[42]  Ihar Volkau,et al.  Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Angiography Scans on 1.5, 3, and 7 Tesla Units: A Quantitative Study of 3‐Dimensional Cerebrovasculature , 2013, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[43]  Donald L. Miller,et al.  Radiation dose and cancer risk among pediatric patients undergoing interventional neuroradiology procedures , 2006, Pediatric Radiology.

[44]  T. Krings,et al.  Contrast-enhanced time-resolved 3-D MRA: applications in neurosurgery and interventional neuroradiology , 2007, Neuroradiology.

[45]  P Schlattmann,et al.  Assessment of 3D-TOF-MRA at 3.0 tesla in the characterization of the angioarchitecture of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a preliminary study , 2007, Acta radiologica.

[46]  D. Kondziolka,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging: an accurate method to evaluate arteriovenous malformations after stereotactic radiosurgery. , 1996, Journal of neurosurgery.

[47]  S. Zuehlsdorff,et al.  4D Radial Acquisition Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography and Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations: Quickly Approaching Digital Subtraction Angiography , 2009, Stroke.

[48]  M. Phillips,et al.  Stereotactic heavy-charged-particle Bragg-peak radiation for intracranial arteriovenous malformations. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[49]  S. Paek,et al.  Clinical and neuroimaging outcome of cerebral arteriovenous malformations after Gamma Knife surgery: analysis of the radiation injury rate depending on the arteriovenous malformation volume. , 2008, Journal of neurosurgery.

[50]  Denis Trystram,et al.  Three‐dimensional dynamic time‐resolved contrast‐enhanced MRA using parallel imaging and a variable rate k‐space sampling strategy in intracranial arteriovenous malformations , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[51]  C. Lindquist,et al.  Stereotactic Radiosurgical Treatment of Arteriovenous Malformations , 1988 .

[52]  R F Spetzler,et al.  A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. , 1986, Journal of neurosurgery.

[53]  D. Kondziolka,et al.  ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING. AUTHORS' REPLY , 1997 .

[54]  Catherine Oppenheim,et al.  Three-dimensional dynamic magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of radiosurgically treated cerebral arteriovenous malformations , 2006, European Radiology.

[55]  T. Chenevert,et al.  Neuroradiologic applications of dynamic MR angiography at 3 T. , 2009, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[56]  W. Steinbrich,et al.  Anatomic evaluation of the circle of Willis: MR angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. , 1996, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[57]  R. Friedlander Arteriovenous Malformations of the Brain , 2007 .

[58]  A. Mahapatra,et al.  Outcome after hemorrhage following Gamma Knife surgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. , 2009, Journal of neurosurgery.