Bond Strength and Cytotoxicity of a Universal Adhesive According to the Hybridization Strategies to Dentin.

This study evaluated application protocol (etch-and-rinse/ER and self-etching/SE) and dentin wettability (wet and dry) on microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and transdentinal cytotoxicity of ScotchbondTM Universal (SU) adhesive system. The μTBS values and fracture mode were registered 24 h after adhesive system application and resin composite block build-up (n=5). For analysis of transdentinal cytotoxicity, odontoblast-like MDPC-23 cells were seeded on pulpal surface of dentin discs (0.4 mm thick) adapted to artificial pulp chambers (n=8). The adhesive system was applied to occlusal surface, followed by 24-h incubation time. Cell viability (Alamar Blue) and morphology (SEM) were assessed. Adper Single Bond 2 and Clearfil SE Bond were used as positive controls of the ER and SE application protocols, respectively. No treatment was performed on negative control (NC) group. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's tests (α=5%). Higher μTBS values were found for ER mode in comparison with SE protocol (p<0.05). Dentin wettability had no effect on bond strength of SU in both the ER and SE techniques (p>0.05). Most fractures involved hybrid layer and/or adhesive layer. Neither variable prevented the intense toxic effects of adhesive systems on MDPC-23 cultured cells, since intense reduction in cell viability (±88%) and severe alterations in cell morphology were observed for all groups compared to NC, with no differences among them (p>0.05). Therefore, it was concluded that application of SU following the ER protocol had better adhesive performance. However, this adhesive system featured intense transdentinal cytotoxicity to pulp cells, regardless of application protocol and dentin wettability.

[1]  F. Tay,et al.  Cross-linked dry bonding: A new etch-and-rinse technique. , 2016, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[2]  J. Hebling,et al.  Biocompatibility of a restorative resin-modified glass ionomer cement applied in very deep cavities prepared in human teeth. , 2016, General dentistry.

[3]  J. Hebling,et al.  Cytocompatibility of HEMA-free resin-based luting cements according to application protocols on dentine surfaces. , 2016, International endodontic journal.

[4]  J. Perdigão,et al.  A new universal simplified adhesive: 36-Month randomized double-blind clinical trial. , 2015, Journal of dentistry.

[5]  J. Perdigão,et al.  Does active application of universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode improve their performance? , 2015, Journal of dentistry.

[6]  D. Pashley,et al.  Transdentinal cytotoxicity of glutaraldehyde on odontoblast-like cells. , 2015, Journal of dentistry.

[7]  L. Tjäderhane,et al.  Dentin bonding: can we make it last? , 2015, Operative dentistry.

[8]  J. Hebling,et al.  Methods to evaluate and strategies to improve the biocompatibility of dental materials and operative techniques. , 2014, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[9]  Q. Ye,et al.  Polymerization- and solvent-induced phase separation in hydrophilic-rich dentin adhesive mimic. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[10]  F. Tay,et al.  Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study. , 2014, Journal of dentistry.

[11]  J. Perdigão,et al.  A new universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation. , 2014, Operative dentistry.

[12]  M. Ülker,et al.  Residual HEMA and TEGDMA Release and Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Compomers Cured with Different Light Sources , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[13]  J. Perdigão,et al.  Dentin adhesion and MMPs: a comprehensive review. , 2013, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[14]  S. Minagi,et al.  Adhesive interfacial interaction affected by different carbon-chain monomers. , 2013, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[15]  Nara Hellen Campanha Bombarda,et al.  Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. , 2013, Journal of dentistry.

[16]  R. Grande,et al.  The role of dentin moisture in the degradation of resin-dentin interfaces under clinical and laboratory conditions. , 2012, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[17]  J. Perdigão,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies: 18-month results. , 2012, Operative dentistry.

[18]  A. Mine,et al.  State of the art of self-etch adhesives. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[19]  V. Rousson,et al.  Clinical performance of cervical restorations--a meta-analysis. , 2010, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[20]  M. Furlan,et al.  Transdentinal diffusion and cytotoxicity of self-etching adhesive systems , 2009, Cell Biology and Toxicology.

[21]  A. Reis,et al.  Impact of adhesive application to wet and dry dentin on long-term resin-dentin bond strengths. , 2007, Operative dentistry.

[22]  Adam M. Donnelly,et al.  From dry bonding to water-wet bonding to ethanol-wet bonding. A review of the interactions between dentin matrix and solvated resins using a macromodel of the hybrid layer. , 2007, American journal of dentistry.

[23]  R. Frankenberger,et al.  Single-bottle adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. I. In vivo evidence. , 2004, Journal of dentistry.

[24]  Antonio Apicella,et al.  Effect of adhesive layer properties on stress distribution in composite restorations--a 3D finite element analysis. , 2002, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.