Ruling out deep venous thrombosis in primary care

In primary care, the physician has to decide which patients have to be referred for further diagnostic work-up. At present, only in 20% to 30% of the referred patients the diagnosis DVT is confirmed. This puts a burden on both patients and health care budgets. The question arises whether the diagnostic work-up and referral of patients suspected of DVT in primary care could be more efficient. A simple diagnostic decision rule developed in primary care is required to safely exclude the presence of DVT in patients suspected of DVT, without the need for referral. In a cross-sectional study, we investigated the data of 1295 consecutive patients consulting their primary care physician with symptoms suggestive of DVT, to develop and validate a simple diagnostic decision rule to safely exclude the presence of DVT. Independent diagnostic indicators of the presence of DVT were male gender, oral contraceptive use, presence of malignancy, recent surgery, absence of leg trauma, vein distension, calf difference and D-dimer test result. Application of this rule could reduce the number of referrals by at least 23% while only 0.7% of the patients with a DVT would not be referred. We conclude that by using eight simple diagnostic indicators from patient history, physical examination and the result of D-dimer testing, it is possible to safely rule out DVT in a large number of patients in primary care, reducing unnecessary patient burden and health care costs.

[1]  M. Pruijm,et al.  Combination of a Normal D-Dimer Concentration and a Non-High Pretest Clinical Probability Score Is a Safe Strategy to Exclude Deep Venous Thrombosis , 2003, Circulation.

[2]  Paolo Prandoni,et al.  Accuracy of clinical assessment of deep-vein thrombosis , 1995, The Lancet.

[3]  Daniel B. Mark,et al.  TUTORIAL IN BIOSTATISTICS MULTIVARIABLE PROGNOSTIC MODELS: ISSUES IN DEVELOPING MODELS, EVALUATING ASSUMPTIONS AND ADEQUACY, AND MEASURING AND REDUCING ERRORS , 1996 .

[4]  J. Douketis,et al.  Management of Suspected Deep Venous Thrombosis in Outpatients by Using Clinical Assessment and d-dimer Testing , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  G. Raskob,et al.  The Clinical Validity of Normal Compression Ultrasonography in Outpatients Suspected of Having Deep Venous Thrombosis , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[6]  J. Cornuz,et al.  Diagnostic algorithms for deep vein thrombosis: work in progress. , 2002, The American journal of medicine.

[7]  J. Hirsh,et al.  How we diagnose and treat deep vein thrombosis. , 2002, Blood.

[8]  J. Habbema,et al.  Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  D. Slosman,et al.  Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients , 1999, The Lancet.

[10]  J. Hoak,et al.  Management of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. A statement for healthcare professionals. Council on Thrombosis (in consultation with the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology), American Heart Association. , 1996, Circulation.

[11]  L. Abenhaim,et al.  Clinical Prediction of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients with Leg Symptoms , 1999, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[12]  H. Büller,et al.  Compression ultrasonography for diagnostic management of patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis: prospective cohort study , 1998, BMJ.

[13]  S Greenland,et al.  A critical look at methods for handling missing covariates in epidemiologic regression analyses. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.

[14]  S. Van Uum,et al.  Exclusion of Deep Venous Thrombosis with D-Dimer Testing , 2000, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[15]  S. Salles-Cunha,et al.  Gender bias in use of venous ultrasonography for diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. , 1995, Journal of vascular surgery.

[16]  S. Doucette,et al.  Does this patient have deep vein thrombosis? , 1998, JAMA.

[17]  Jesse A. Berlin,et al.  Assessing the Generalizability of Prognostic Information , 1999 .

[18]  J. Cornuz,et al.  Clinical prediction of deep venous thrombosis using two risk assessment methods in combination with rapid quantitative D-dimer testing. , 2002, The American journal of medicine.

[19]  Janis Bormanis,et al.  Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management , 1997, The Lancet.

[20]  J. Hirsh,et al.  A simple clinical model for the diagnosis of deep‐vein thrombosis combined with impedance plethysmography: potential for an improvement in the diagnostic process , 1998, Journal of internal medicine.

[21]  Karel G M Moons,et al.  Diagnostic research on routine care data: prospects and problems. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[22]  Paolo Prandoni,et al.  Simplification of the diagnostic management of suspected deep vein thrombosis. , 2002, Archives of internal medicine.

[23]  J. D. Fraser,et al.  Deep venous thrombosis: recent advances and optimal investigation with US. , 1999, Radiology.

[24]  H. Nieuwenhuis,et al.  The usefulness of five d‐dimer assays in the exclusion of deep venous thrombosis , 2003, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[25]  Jeffrey S. Ginsberg,et al.  Strategies for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. , 2000, Thrombosis research.

[26]  Roderick J. A. Little Regression with Missing X's: A Review , 1992 .

[27]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature: XXII: how to use articles about clinical decision rules. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 2000, JAMA.

[28]  A. Cohen,et al.  Clinical findings associated with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis: a basis for quantifying clinical judgment. , 1990, The American journal of medicine.

[29]  H. Wollersheim,et al.  Reliability of Five Rapid D-Dimer Assays Compared to ELISA in the Exclusion of Deep Venous Thrombosis , 1997, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[30]  A. Hoes,et al.  Limited value of patient history and physical examination in diagnosing deep vein thrombosis in primary care. , 2004, Family practice.