"Majoring" and "Minoring" by Foraging Bumblebees, Bombus Vagans: An Experimental Analysis

On their first 2 foraging trips out of the hive, young Boinhus x'iwtcans workers visited, on the average, 4 or 5 different kinds of rewarding as well as unrewarding flowers, and few of each kind in succession. But, after 3-7 foraging trips, most of the bees specialized on jewelweed, which was the most numerous flower available with high nectar reward. When jewelweed specialists became numerous, and the food rewards in jewelweed declined, the bees resampled the reward spectrum. They again visited, and continued to vist, at least 3-4 different kinds of flowers on successive foraging trips in an enclosure where patch size was limited. Flowers in open inflorescences (aster, goldenrod) were handled appropriately from the start, but handling accuracy at zygomorphic flowers jewelweedd, turtlehead) was initially 40-50% at the first 10 flowers encountered, and increased to >90%Xe in 60-100 flower visits. It is concluded that the most important problem faced by the foraging bees attempting to enhance food intake is that of assessing the resources, which often change rapidly. Individual bees specialize on flowers yielding rewards that are "perceived" to exceed some minimum. However, the difference between perceived and actual rewards is, in part, determined by handling skills that are affected by foraging experience. Thus, optimal foraging in the bees must be explored from the per- spective of long- rather than short-term energy balance.

[1]  Bernd Heinrich,et al.  WHY DO BUMBLEBEES MAJOR? A MATHEMATICAL MODEL' , 1976 .

[2]  G. Estabrook,et al.  Optimal Diet as a Function of Absolute Abundance, Relative Abundance, and Relative Value of Available Prey , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[3]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Seed Selection in Dipodomys Merriami and Perognathus Penicillatus , 1974 .

[4]  M. Cody,et al.  Optimization in Ecology: Natural selection produces optimal results unless constrained by history or by competing goals. , 1974, Science.

[5]  E. Charnov Optimal Foraging: Attack Strategy of a Mantid , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[6]  Graham H. Pyke,et al.  Optimal Foraging: A Selective Review of Theory and Tests , 1977, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[7]  F. Gill,et al.  Foraging Efficiencies and Time Budgets in Nectar‐Feeding Birds , 1975 .

[8]  R. Macarthur,et al.  On Optimal Use of a Patchy Environment , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[9]  William W. Murdoch,et al.  Switching in Predatory Fish , 1975 .

[10]  T. Whitham Coevolution of Foraging in Bombus and Nectar Dispensing in Chilopsis: A Last Dreg Theory , 1977, Science.

[11]  James N. M. Smith,et al.  FOOD-SEARCHING BEHAVIOR OF TITMICE IN PATCHY ENVIRONMENTS' , 1974 .

[12]  T. Schoener Theory of Feeding Strategies , 1971 .

[13]  T. Royama Factors Governing the Hunting Behaviour and Selection of Food by the Great Tit (Parus major L.) , 1970 .

[14]  J. Krebs,et al.  Hunting by expectation or optimal foraging: A study of patch use by chickadees , 1974 .

[15]  D. J. Hall,et al.  Optimal Foraging and the Size Selection of Prey by the Bluegill Sunfish (Lepomis Macrochirus) , 1974 .

[16]  F. Gill,et al.  Foraging Strategies and Energetics of East African Sunbirds at Mistletoe Flowers , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[17]  Optimal Choice in Animals , 1968, The American Naturalist.

[18]  E. Hartwick Foraging strategy of the black oyster catcher (Haematopus bachmani Audubon) , 1976 .