using Semantic Technologies in Digital Libraries

[1]  Marek Hatala,et al.  Global vs. Community Metadata Standards: Empowering Users for Knowledge Exchange , 2002, International Semantic Web Conference.

[2]  Carol Peters,et al.  Evaluation of digital libraries , 2007, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[3]  Baden Hughes Metadata Quality Evaluation: Experience from the Open Language Archives Community , 2004, ICADL.

[4]  Wolf-Tilo Balke,et al.  Exposing the hidden web for chemical digital libraries , 2010, JCDL '10.

[5]  Sarah E. Thomas Quality in Bibliographic Control , 1996, Libr. Trends.

[6]  Yong Yu,et al.  Optimizing web search using social annotations , 2007, WWW '07.

[7]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Towards the self-annotating web , 2004, WWW '04.

[8]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Deriving concept hierarchies from text , 1999, SIGIR '99.

[9]  Kurt Maly,et al.  Arc - An OAI Service Provider for Digital Library Federation , 2001, D Lib Mag..

[10]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Data quality assessment , 2002, CACM.

[11]  R. M. Cormack,et al.  A Review of Classification , 1971 .

[12]  Ion Muslea,et al.  Machine learning for online query relaxation , 2004, KDD.

[13]  Christophe Claramunt,et al.  A lineage metadata model for the temporal management of a cadastre application , 1999, Proceedings. Tenth International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 99.

[14]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Qood grid: A metaontology-based framework for ontology evaluation and selection , 2006, EON@WWW.

[15]  S. Heller,et al.  An Open Standard for Chemical Structure Representation: The IUPAC Chemical Identifier , 2003 .

[16]  Ilkay Altintas,et al.  Provenance Collection Support in the Kepler Scientific Workflow System , 2006, IPAW.

[17]  David Weininger,et al.  SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules , 1988, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[18]  Rajendra Bose A conceptual framework for composing and managing scientific data lineage , 2002, Proceedings 14th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management.

[19]  Erik Duval,et al.  User Behavior in Learning Object Repositories: An Empirical Analysis , 2004 .

[20]  C. Steinbeck,et al.  Recent developments of the chemistry development kit (CDK) - an open-source java library for chemo- and bioinformatics. , 2006, Current pharmaceutical design.

[21]  Peter Murray-Rust,et al.  Chemical documents: machine understanding and automated information extraction. , 2004, Organic & biomolecular chemistry.

[22]  John M. Barnard,et al.  Chemical Similarity Searching , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[23]  J Diederich,et al.  Automatically Created Concept Graphs Using Descriptive Keywords in the Medical Domain , 2008, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[24]  D Weininger,et al.  SMILES: a line notation and computerized interpreter for chemical structures. , 1987 .

[25]  Amanda J. Wilson,et al.  Toward Releasing the Metadata Bottleneck , 2007 .

[26]  E. Leistner Die Biologie der Taxane: Arzneimittel aus der Natur , 2005 .

[27]  Jeffrey Beall,et al.  Metadata and Data Quality Problems in the Digital Library , 2005, J. Digit. Inf..

[28]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Automatic Word Sense Discrimination , 1998, Comput. Linguistics.

[29]  Erik Duval,et al.  Automatic evaluation of metadata quality in digital repositories , 2009, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[30]  Wolf-Tilo Balke,et al.  Using Semantic Technologies in Digital Libraries - A Roadmap to Quality Evaluation , 2009, ECDL.

[31]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  Streams, structures, spaces, scenarios, societies (5s): A formal model for digital libraries , 2004, TOIS.

[32]  Thomas Mann Cataloging Must Change! and indexer consistency studies : Misreading the evidence at our peril , 1997 .

[33]  Joe R. McDaniel,et al.  Kekule: OCR-optical chemical (structure) recognition , 1992, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[34]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  "What is a good digital library?" - A quality model for digital libraries , 2007, Inf. Process. Manag..

[35]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Community-driven ontology management: DERI case study , 2005, The 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'05).

[36]  Anna V. Zhdanova,et al.  Community-driven ontology construction in social networking portals , 2008 .

[37]  P Willett,et al.  Similarity-based approaches to virtual screening. , 2003, Biochemical Society transactions.

[38]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems , 2005, ArXiv.

[39]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Social aspects of digital libraries (working session) , 1996, DL '96.

[40]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Measures of Association for Cross Classifications. II: Further Discussion and References , 1959 .

[41]  Wolf-Tilo Balke,et al.  The Semantic GrowBag Algorithm: Automatically Deriving Categorization Systems , 2007, ECDL.

[42]  Ralph Kimball,et al.  The Data Warehouse ETL Toolkit: Practical Techniques for Extracting, Cleaning, Conforming, and Delivering Data , 2004 .

[43]  David McLean,et al.  An Approach for Measuring Semantic Similarity between Words Using Multiple Information Sources , 2003, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[44]  Stuart L. Schreiber,et al.  Query Chem: a Google-powered web search combining text and chemical structures , 2006, Bioinform..

[45]  Tefko Saracevic,et al.  Digital Library Evaluation: Toward Evolution of Concepts , 2000, Libr. Trends.

[46]  Jane Greenberg,et al.  Author-generated Dublin Core Metadata for Web Resources: A Baseline Study in an Organization , 2001, J. Digit. Inf..

[47]  Jung-ran Park Metadata Quality in Digital Repositories: A Survey of the Current State of the Art , 2009 .

[48]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  Data Lineage Model for Taverna Workflows with Lightweight Annotation Requirements , 2008, IPAW.

[49]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Measures of Association for Cross Classifications III: Approximate Sampling Theory , 1963 .

[50]  H. L. Morgan The Generation of a Unique Machine Description for Chemical Structures-A Technique Developed at Chemical Abstracts Service. , 1965 .

[51]  William E. Moen,et al.  Assessing metadata quality: findings and methodological considerations from an evaluation of the US Government Information Locator Service (GILS) , 1998, Proceedings IEEE International Forum on Research and Technology Advances in Digital Libraries -ADL'98-.

[52]  Z. Hubálek COEFFICIENTS OF ASSOCIATION AND SIMILARITY, BASED ON BINARY (PRESENCE‐ABSENCE) DATA: AN EVALUATION , 1982 .

[53]  Sebastian Ryszard Kruk,et al.  Evaluation of Semantic and Social Technologies for Digital Libraries , 2008, ECDL.

[54]  Andreas Hotho,et al.  Information Retrieval in Folksonomies: Search and Ranking , 2006, ESWC.

[55]  William McMullen,et al.  A Flexible And Generic Data Quality Metamodel , 2007, ICIQ.

[56]  M. Kendall A NEW MEASURE OF RANK CORRELATION , 1938 .

[57]  Linda C. Smith,et al.  A framework for information quality assessment , 2007 .

[58]  William J. Wiswesser,et al.  The Wiswesser line-formula chemical notation , 1968 .

[59]  Sarah Currier,et al.  Building Quality Assurance into Metadata Creation: An Analysis based on the Learning Objects and e-Prints Communities of Practice , 2003, Dublin Core Conference.

[60]  John M. Barnard,et al.  A Universal Structure/Substructure Representation for PC-Host Communication , 1989 .

[61]  Wolf-Tilo Balke,et al.  Query relaxation using malleable schemas , 2007, SIGMOD '07.

[62]  Mimi Recker,et al.  Using web metrics to analyze digital libraries , 2008, JCDL.

[63]  Roald Hoffmann,et al.  Representation in Chemistry , 1989 .

[64]  Jung-ran Park,et al.  An Assessment of Metadata Quality: A Case Study of the National Science Digital Library Metadata Repository , 2013 .

[65]  Wolfgang Nejdl,et al.  Can all tags be used for search? , 2008, CIKM '08.

[66]  Alexandra Poulovassilis,et al.  Query Relaxation in RDF , 2008, J. Data Semant..

[67]  James Frew,et al.  Composing lineage metadata with XML for custom satellite-derived data products , 2004, Proceedings. 16th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management, 2004..

[68]  James Cheney,et al.  Provenance management in curated databases , 2006, SIGMOD Conference.

[69]  Alton Yeow-Kuan Chua,et al.  Can Social Tags Help You Find What You Want? , 2008, ECDL.

[70]  Igor V. Filippov,et al.  Optical Structure Recognition Software To Recover Chemical Information: OSRA, An Open Source Solution , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[71]  Latif Al-Hakim,et al.  Information Quality Management: Theory and Applications , 2006 .

[72]  Sebastian Ryszard Kruk,et al.  JeromeDL - a Semantic Digital Library , 2007, Semantic Web Challenge.

[73]  Lemont B. Kier,et al.  Electrotopological State Indices for Atom Types: A Novel Combination of Electronic, Topological, and Valence State Information , 1995, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[74]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  The PageRank Citation Ranking : Bringing Order to the Web , 1999, WWW 1999.

[75]  Diane I. Hillmann,et al.  The Continuum of Metadata Quality: Defining, Expressing, Exploiting , 2004 .

[76]  R. Webster Homer,et al.  SYBYL Line Notation (SLN): A Versatile Language for Chemical Structure Representation , 1997, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[77]  Peter Murray-Rust,et al.  High-Throughput Identification of Chemistry in Life Science Texts , 2006, CompLife.

[78]  York Sure-Vetter,et al.  How to Design Better Ontology Metrics , 2007, ESWC.

[79]  Jennifer Widom,et al.  Practical lineage tracing in data warehouses , 2000, Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Data Engineering (Cat. No.00CB37073).

[80]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Data quality in context , 1997, CACM.

[81]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Measures of association for cross classifications , 1979 .

[82]  P Willett,et al.  Grouping of coefficients for the calculation of inter-molecular similarity and dissimilarity using 2D fragment bit-strings. , 2002, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[83]  Susan Gauch,et al.  Incorporating quality metrics in centralized/distributed information retrieval on the World Wide Web , 2000, SIGIR '00.

[84]  Besiki Stvilia,et al.  Is 'Quality' Metadata 'Shareable' Metadata? The Implications of Local Metadata Practice on Federated Collections , 2005 .

[85]  Ralf Krestel,et al.  The Art of Tagging: Measuring the Quality of Tags , 2008, ASWC.

[86]  Jennifer Widom,et al.  Trio: A System for Integrated Management of Data, Accuracy, and Lineage , 2004, CIDR.

[87]  C. Lee Giles,et al.  Extraction and search of chemical formulae in text documents on the web , 2007, WWW '07.

[88]  James G. Nourse,et al.  Reoptimization of MDL Keys for Use in Drug Discovery , 2002, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[89]  Wolf-Tilo Balke,et al.  Building Chemical Information Systems - the ViFaChem II Project , 2009, BTW.

[90]  Ahmad Abdulkader,et al.  Low Cost Correction of OCR Errors Using Learning in a Multi-Engine Environment , 2009, 2009 10th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition.

[91]  Valentin Robu,et al.  The complex dynamics of collaborative tagging , 2007, WWW '07.

[92]  D. J. Gluck,et al.  A Chemical Structure Storage and Search System Developed at Du Pont. , 1965 .

[93]  Henry S. Rzepa,et al.  Chemical Markup, XML, and the Worldwide Web. 1. Basic Principles , 1999, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[94]  F. W. Lancaster,et al.  Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice , 1991 .

[95]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  OntoQA: Metric-Based Ontology Quality Analysis , 2005 .

[96]  Cláudio T. Silva,et al.  VisTrails: visualization meets data management , 2006, SIGMOD Conference.

[97]  Michael F. Lynch,et al.  The Sheffield Generic Structures Project-a Retrospective Review , 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[98]  Marti A. Hearst Automatic Acquisition of Hyponyms from Large Text Corpora , 1992, COLING.

[99]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  ONTOMETRIC: A Method to Choose the Appropriate Ontology , 2004, J. Database Manag..

[100]  Besiki Stvilia,et al.  Metadata Quality Problems in Federated Collections , 2006 .

[101]  Loll N. Rolling Indexing consistency, quality and efficiency , 1981, Inf. Process. Manag..

[102]  Roy Rada,et al.  Development and application of a metric on semantic nets , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[103]  Norbert Fuhr,et al.  Digital Libraries: A Generic Classification and Evaluation Scheme , 2001, ECDL.

[104]  C. Lee Giles,et al.  Mining, indexing, and searching for textual chemical molecule information on the web , 2008, WWW.