On the Theoretical Breadth of Design-Based Research in Education

Over the past decade, design experimentation has become an increasingly accepted mode of research appropriate for the theoretical and empirical study of learning amidst complex educational interventions as they are enacted in everyday settings. There is still a significant lack of clarity surrounding methodological and epistemological features of this body of work. In fact, there is a broad variety of theory being developed in this mode of research. In contrast to recent efforts to seek a singular definition for design experimentation, I argue that methodological and epistemological issues are significantly more tractable if considered from the perspective of manifold families of theoretically framed design-based research. After characterizing a range of such families, I suggest that, as we deliberate on the nature of design-based research, greater attention should be given to the pluralistic nature of learning theory, to the relation between theory and method, and to working across theoretical and methodological boundaries through the use of mixed methods. Finally, I suggest that design-based research-with its focus on promoting, sustaining, and understanding innovation in the world-should be considered a form of scholarly inquiry that sits alongside the panoply of canonical forms ranging from the experimental, historical, philosophical, sociological, legal, and interpretive.

[1]  Paul R. Pintrich,et al.  Beliefs About Science: How Does Science Instruction Contribute? , 2001 .

[2]  Andra A. DiSessa Inventing Graphing: Meta­ Representational Expertise in Children , 1991 .

[3]  L. Schauble,et al.  Design Experiments in Educational Research , 2003 .

[4]  J. Lemke Across the Scales of Time: Artifacts, Activities, and Meanings in Ecosocial Systems , 2000 .

[5]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Designing evaluations of educational and social programs , 1983 .

[6]  M. Gertrude Hennessey,et al.  Sixth-Grade Students' Epistemologies of Science: The Impact of School Science Experiences on Epistemological Development , 2000 .

[7]  M. Cole Cultural psychology: a once and future discipline? , 1996, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[8]  C. Schwarz Developing students' understanding of scientific modeling , 1998 .

[9]  S. Heath Ways with Words: Language, Life and Work in Communities and Classrooms , 1983 .

[10]  M. Bers Identity Construction Environments: Developing Personal and Moral Values Through the Design of a Virtual City , 2001 .

[11]  M. Rose The Working Life of a Waitress , 2001 .

[12]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Making work visible , 1995, CACM.

[13]  L. Cronbach Beyond the Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology. , 1975 .

[14]  B. White ThinkerTools: Causal Models, Conceptual Change, and Science Education , 1993 .

[15]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[16]  Denis Newman,et al.  The Construction Zone: Working for Cognitive Change in School , 1989 .

[17]  S. Barab,et al.  Designing and building an on-line community: The struggle to support sociability in the inquiry learning forum , 2001 .

[18]  Kathleen E. Metz Emergent Understanding and Attribution of Randomness: Comparative Analysis of the Reasoning of Primary Grade Children and Undergraduates. , 1998 .

[19]  Joel R. Levin,et al.  What to do about educational research's credibility gaps? , 1999 .

[20]  R. Sternberg What Is an “Expert Student?” , 2003 .

[21]  W. Frawley Mind as Action , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  Jörg M. Haake,et al.  Hypermedia and cognition: designing for comprehension , 1995, CACM.

[23]  P. Bourdieu The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason , 1975 .

[24]  A. diSessa Local sciences: viewing the design of human-computer systems as cognitive science , 1991 .

[25]  Philip Bell,et al.  Using argument representations to make thinking visible for individuals and groups , 1997, CSCL.

[26]  Kaj Grønbæk,et al.  Cooperative design: techniques and experiences from the Scandinavian scene , 1995 .

[27]  A. Kelly Design Research in Education: Yes, but is it Methodological? , 2004 .

[28]  D. C. Phillips,et al.  On the Science of Education Design Studies , 2003 .

[29]  Allan Collins,et al.  Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues , 2004 .

[30]  Reed Stevens,et al.  Divisions of Labor in School and in the Workplace: Comparing Computer and Paper-Supported Activities Across Settings , 2000 .

[31]  Allan Collins,et al.  Toward a Design Science of Education , 1992 .

[32]  Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry , 2003 .

[33]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  From Physical Models to Biomechanics: A Design-Based Modeling Approach. , 1998 .

[34]  G. Fine Shared Fantasy: Role-Playing Games as Social Worlds , 1983 .

[35]  Abbie Brown,et al.  Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .

[36]  Pablo Kreimer Handbook of science mad Technology Studies, Jasanoff, S., Markle, G., Petersen, J. y Pinch, T. (comps.), London, New Delhi, Thousand Oaks, Sage, 1995, 820 páginas , 1995 .

[37]  B. Shore Keeping the Conversation Going: An Interview with Jerome Bruner , 1997 .

[38]  Kenneth T. Anderson,et al.  D ESIGN M ANAGEMENT J OURNAL Design Ethnography , 1999 .

[39]  Joseph L. Polman,et al.  Designing Project-Based Science: Connecting Learners Through Guided Inquiry (Ways of Knowing in Science Series) , 1999 .

[40]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Designing a community of young learners: Theoretical and practical lessons. , 1998 .

[41]  J. Roschelle Learning by Collaborating: Convergent Conceptual Change , 1992 .

[42]  Keith Duncan,et al.  Cognitive Engineering , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[43]  Anita M. Pomerantz,et al.  Conversation analysis: an approach to the study of social action as sense making practices , 1997 .

[44]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Supporting the improvement of learning and teaching in social and institutional context , 2001 .

[45]  Carl Bereiter,et al.  Design Research for Sustained Innovation , 2002 .

[46]  R. Linn,et al.  Qualitative methods in research on teaching , 1985 .

[47]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .

[48]  Iris Tabak,et al.  BGuILE: Stragtegic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms , 2001 .