Visual search is guided by prospective and retrospective memory

Although there has been some controversy as to whether attention is guided by memory during visual search, recent findings have suggested that memory helps to prevent attention from needlessly reinspecting examined items. Until now, it has been assumed that some form of retrospective memory is responsible for keeping track of examined items and preventing revisitations. Alternatively, some form of prospective memory, such as strategic scanpath planning, could be responsible for guiding attention away from examined items. We used a new technique that allowed us to selectively prevent retrospective or prospective memory from contributing to search. We demonstrated that both retrospective and prospective memory guide attention during visual search.

[1]  J. Findlay Saccade Target Selection During Visual Search , 1997, Vision Research.

[2]  Jay Pratt,et al.  The role of spatial working memory in inhibition of return: Evidence from divided attention tasks , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Iain D Gilchrist,et al.  Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search , 2000, Current Biology.

[4]  Todd S. Horowitz,et al.  Visual search has no memory , 1998, Nature.

[5]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  B. C. Motter,et al.  The guidance of eye movements during active visual search , 1998, Vision Research.

[7]  David E. Irwin Robert D. Gordon Eye Movements, Attention and Trans-saccadic Memory , 1998 .

[8]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[9]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  A new estimation of the duration of attentional dwell time , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  Dagmar Müller,et al.  Sit-and-Wait Strategies in Dynamic Visual Search , 2003, Psychological science.

[11]  I. Gilchrist,et al.  Evidence for a systematic component within scan paths in visual search , 2006 .

[12]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[13]  Á. Kristjánsson,et al.  In Search of Remembrance: Evidence for Memory in Visual Search , 2000, Psychological science.

[14]  G. Woodman,et al.  Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Covert shifts of attention precede involuntary eye movements , 2004 .

[16]  J. McCarley,et al.  Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  Min-Shik Kim,et al.  Visual Search Does Not Remain Efficient When Executive Working Memory Is Working , 2004, Psychological science.

[18]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Attentional pursuit is faster than attentional saccade. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[19]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Parietal Lobe Lesions Disrupt Saccadic Remapping of Inhibitory Location Tagging , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  D. Burr,et al.  Changes in visual perception at the time of saccades , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[21]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  R. Parasuraman,et al.  The scaling of spatial attention in visual search and its modification in healthy aging , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  Yuhong V. Jiang,et al.  What is learned in spatial contextual cuing— configuration or individual locations? , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  How Much Memory Does Oculomotor Search Have? , 2003, Psychological science.

[25]  J. Henderson,et al.  The Role of Fixation Position in Detecting Scene Changes Across Saccades , 1999 .

[26]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of Return is a Foraging Facilitator in Visual Search , 1999 .

[27]  Carolina M. Zingale,et al.  Planning sequences of saccades , 1987, Vision Research.

[28]  Allan C. Dobbins,et al.  Quantitative depth perception of surfaces with multiple matches , 2004 .

[29]  B. Dosher,et al.  The role of attention in the programming of saccades , 1995, Vision Research.

[30]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Suppressing Where but Not What: , 2004, Psychological science.

[33]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Contextual cueing reduces interference from task-irrelevant onset distractors , 2001 .

[34]  J M Wolfe,et al.  Search for multiple targets: Remember the targets, forget the search , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  M. Chun,et al.  Organization of visual short-term memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  L. Li,et al.  Searching for One Versus Two Identical Targets: When Visual Search Has a Memory , 2000, Psychological science.

[37]  Min-Shik Kim,et al.  The role of spatial working memory in visual search efficiency , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[38]  J. Hoffman,et al.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  Todd S Horowitz,et al.  The multi-item localization (MILO) task: Measuring the spatiotemporal context of vision for action , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Visual Search has Memory , 2001, Psychological science.