Universality is Inescapable

This paper argues that universal classification systems – that is, systems that are general in coverage – are necessary in an era that values interoperability. Such systems have numerous other advantages. Questions regarding the feasibility of such KOSs can only be addressed empirically. The paper outlines avenues for empirical exploration.

[1]  C. Beghtol.  Semantic validity: concepts of warrant in bibliographic classification systems , 1986 .

[2]  Rick Szostak,et al.  Classifying for Social Diversity , 2014 .

[3]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Are relations in thesauri “context‐free, definitional, and true in all possible worlds”? , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  Patrice Landry.  Subject Access: Preparing for the Future , 2011 .

[5]  Neil R. Smalheiser,et al.  Information discovery from complementary literatures: categorizing viruses as potential weapons , 2001 .

[6]  Ingetraut Dahlberg,et al.  Universal classification : subject analysis and ordering systems : proceedings, 4th Internatl. Study Conference on Classification Research, 6th Annual Conference of Gesellschaft für Klassifikation e.V., Augsburg, 28 June-2 July 1982 , 1982 .

[7]  Rick Szostak.  The importance of knowledge organization , 2014 .

[8]  I. Cornelius.  Epistemological Challenges for Information Science: Constructing Information , 2014 .

[9]  Rick Szostak,et al.  A Pluralistic Approach to the Philosophy of Classification , 2015, Libr. Trends.

[10]  Martin Frické,et al.  Logic and the Organization of Information , 2012, Springer New York.

[11]  N. Mclaughlin.  The sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change , 2000 .

[12]  Pierre Tirilly,et al.  Reducing subject tree browsing complexity , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Claudio Gnoli,et al.  Animals Belonging to the Emperor: Enabling Viewpoint Warrant in Classification , 2011 .

[14]  Rick Szostak.  How Universal is Universality , 2014 .

[15]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  On user studies and information needs , 2006, J. Documentation.

[16]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Coming across information serendipitously - Part 1: A process model , 2012, J. Documentation.

[17]  Rick Szostak,et al.  Complex concepts into basic concepts , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  Claudio Gnoli,et al.  The Hague Sorting documents by base theme with synthetic classification : the double query method , 2013 .

[19]  GreenRebecca.  Topical relevance relationships. I , 1995 .

[20]  Rick Szostak,et al.  Beyond Aboutness: Classifying Causal Links in the Service of Interdisciplinarity , 2009 .

[21]  J. M. Crane.  Information-Seeking Habits of Environmental Scientists: A Study of Interdisciplinary Scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina , 2003 .

[22]  Roy Davies,et al.  The Creation of New Knowledge by Information Retrieval and Classification , 1989, J. Documentation.

[23]  Jenna Hartel,et al.  An interdisciplinary platform for information behavior research in the liberal arts hobby , 2014, J. Documentation.

[24]  Rebecca Green,et al.  Topical Relevance Relationships. I. Why Topic Matching Fails , 1995, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[25]  Dagobert Soergel,et al.  Organizing information - principles of data base and retrieval systems , 1985 .

[26]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Concept theory , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[27]  Julian Warner.  Human Information Retrieval , 2009 .

[28]  Carol Tenopir.  Information metrics and user studies , 2003, Aslib Proc..

[29]  Joann Keyton,et al.  Perspective: Examining Communication as Macrocognition , 2010 .

[30]  Cyril Cleverdon,et al.  The Cranfield tests on index language devices , 1997 .

[31]  Claudio Gnoli.  Facets, Levels and Semantic Factoring , 2013 .

[32]  D. J. Foskett.  Concerning general and special classifications , 1991 .

[33]  Claudio Gnoli.  Classification Transcends Library Business , 2010 .

[34]  Ingetraut Dahlberg,et al.  Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung: Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens , 1974 .

[35]  Barbara H. Kwasnik,et al.  Translation of classifications: Issues and solutions as exemplified in the Korean Decimal Classification. , 2004 .

[36]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Core classification theory: a reply to Szostak , 2008, J. Documentation.