A minimalist theory of feature structure

This chapter has two intertwined aims. One is to outline, within a broadly minimalist framework, a fairly explicit proposal for a theory of feature structures, that is, the structure of features and the syntax of how features combine to form lexical items; the other is to explore the consequences of the idea that structure embedding in human language is only ever syntactic (that is, that there is a single engine for the generation of structure and that engine is the syntax—see Marantz 1997, Borer 2005; also compare the ideas in Hauser, Chomsky, and Fitch 2002, Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky 2005). The two aims are connected, since if structure embedding is only syntactic, then the feature structures that are the basic atoms of syntax (i.e. lexical items) cannot involve embedding of one feature inside another. This approach contrasts rather starkly with work in other approaches which take lexical items to have rich featural structure (e.g the chapters using HPSG, LFG and FUG in this volume). Before launching in on features, a few words about what a grammar in Minimalism looks like. Much like categorial grammars, Minimalist grammars can be seen as lexically Many thanks to Ash Asudeh, Pavel Caha, Annabel Cormack, Gabi Danon, Justin Fitzpatrick, Daniel Harbour, Terje Lohndal, Michal Starke, Peter Svenonius, the editors of this volume (Anna Kibort and Grev Corbett), the participants of the Features Workshop and the Tromso Thursday Seminar for extremely helpful discussion and comments. The research reported here was funded by a Leverhulme Trust Major Research Fellowship

[1]  Noam Chomsky A minimalist program for linguistic theory , 1992 .

[2]  Godehard Link The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice‐theoretical Approach , 2008 .

[3]  T. Stowell Subjects Across Categories , 1983, The Linguistic Review.

[4]  E. Stabler Acquiring Languages with Movement , 2002, Syntax.

[5]  Peter Svenonius,et al.  Icelandic Case and the Structure of Events , 2002 .

[6]  A. K. Joshi,et al.  Analyzing Extraposition in a Tree Adjoining Grammar in Discontinuous Constituency. , 1987 .

[7]  D. Pesetsky Tense , Case , and the Nature of Syntactic Categories , 2002 .

[8]  Steven Abney,et al.  The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect , 1972 .

[9]  Peter Svenonius,et al.  Interpreting uninterpretable features , 2003 .

[10]  Marit Julien,et al.  Syntactic heads and word formation , 2002 .

[11]  David Adger,et al.  Remarks on Minimalist feature theory and Move , 2006, Journal of Linguistics.

[12]  M. Brody,et al.  Mirror Theory: Syntactic Representation in Perfect Syntax , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[13]  Edward P. Stabler,et al.  Derivational Minimalism , 1996, LACL.

[14]  N. Curteanu Book Reviews: Lecture on Contemporary Syntactic Theories: An Introduction to Unification-Based Approaches to Grammar , 1987, CL.

[15]  Sam Gutmann,et al.  Cyclic Computation, A Computationally Efficient Minimalist Syntax , 1999 .

[16]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.

[17]  Joseph E. Emonds,et al.  Lexicon and Grammar: The English Syntacticon , 2001 .

[18]  Guglielmo Cinque,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax , 2008 .

[19]  Sam Gutmann,et al.  Crash‐Proof Syntax , 2008 .

[20]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  Category Structures , 1988, Comput. Linguistics.

[21]  R. Bhatt Long Distance Agreement in Hindi-Urdu , 2005 .

[22]  David Pesetsky,et al.  T-to-C Movement: Causes and Consequences , 2000 .

[23]  Robert Rolf Noyer Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure , 1992 .

[24]  Robert Frank,et al.  Phrase Structure Composition and Syntactic Dependencies , 2002, Computational Linguistics.

[25]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[26]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications , 2005, Cognition.

[27]  M. Řezáč,et al.  Elements of Cyclic Syntax: Agree and Merge (2004) , 2004 .

[28]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar , 1985 .

[29]  Fabian Beijer,et al.  Michal Starke's Move Dissolves into Merge: A Theory of Locality , 2001 .

[30]  Philippe Schlenker,et al.  Indexicality, logophoricity, and plural pronouns , 2003 .

[31]  David Adger,et al.  Merge and Move: Wh-Dependencies Revisited , 2005, Linguistic Inquiry.

[32]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[33]  Jairo Nunes,et al.  The Copy Theory of movement and linearization of chains in the Minimalist Program , 1995 .

[34]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[35]  Hans-Martin Gärtner,et al.  Generalized transformations and beyond : reflections on minimalist syntax , 2002 .

[36]  Noam Chomsky Derivation by phase , 1999 .

[37]  L. Rizzi The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery , 1997 .

[38]  Peter Byrne,et al.  On The Edge , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[39]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002 .

[40]  Alec Marantz,et al.  No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon , 1997 .

[41]  Anthony Giddens On The Edge , 2001 .

[42]  H. Harley,et al.  Person and Number in Pronouns: A Feature-Geometric Analysis , 2002 .

[43]  Edward P. Stabler,et al.  Generative Grammars in Resource Logics , 2004 .

[44]  D. Pesetsky,et al.  The Syntax of Valuation and the Interpretability of Features , 2006 .

[45]  Denise Brandão de Oliveira e Britto,et al.  The faculty of language , 2007 .

[46]  Ora Matushansky Head Movement in Linguistic Theory , 2006, Linguistic Inquiry.