Association Tests for X-Chromosomal Markers – A Comparison of Different Test Statistics

Objective: Genome-wide association studies have successfully elucidated the genetic background of complex diseases, but X chromosomal data have usually not been analyzed. A reason for this is that there is no consensus approach for the analysis taking into account the specific features of X chromosomal data. This contribution evaluates test statistics proposed for X chromosomal markers regarding type I error frequencies and power. Methods: We performed extensive simulation studies covering a wide range of different settings. Besides characteristics of the general population, we investigated sex-balanced or unbalanced sampling procedures as well as sex-specific effect sizes, allele frequencies and prevalence. Finally, we applied the test statistics to an association data set on Crohn’s disease. Results: Simulation results imply that in addition to standard quality control, sex-specific allele frequencies should be checked to control for type I errors. Furthermore, we observed distinct differences in power between test statistics which are determined by sampling design and sex specificity of effect sizes. Analysis of the Crohn’s disease data detects two previously unknown genetic regions on the X chromosome. Conclusion: Although no test is uniformly most powerful under all settings, recommendations are offered as to which test performs best under certain conditions.

[1]  Andreas Ziegler,et al.  Genome‐wide association studies: quality control and population‐based measures , 2009, Genetic epidemiology.

[2]  Judy H. Cho,et al.  A Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies IL23R as an Inflammatory Bowel Disease Gene , 2006, Science.

[3]  D. Clayton,et al.  Testing for association on the X chromosome , 2008, Biostatistics.

[4]  Gang Zheng,et al.  Testing association for markers on the X chromosome , 2007, Genetic epidemiology.

[5]  R. Collins,et al.  Common variants at 30 loci contribute to polygenic dyslipidemia , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[6]  Judy H Cho,et al.  Genome-wide association study identifies new susceptibility loci for Crohn disease and implicates autophagy in disease pathogenesis , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[7]  Teri A Manolio,et al.  Genomewide association studies and assessment of the risk of disease. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Simon C. Potter,et al.  Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls , 2007, Nature.

[9]  C. Gieger,et al.  Genomewide association analysis of coronary artery disease. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  M. Gershwin,et al.  The genetics of human autoimmune disease. , 2009, Journal of autoimmunity.

[11]  Carolyn J. Brown,et al.  Silencing of the mammalian X chromosome. , 2005, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.

[12]  P. Sasieni.  From genotypes to genes: doubling the sample size. , 1997, Biometrics.

[13]  Daniel F. Schwarz,et al.  New susceptibility locus for coronary artery disease on chromosome 3q22.3 , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[14]  I. König,et al.  A Statistical Approach to Genetic Epidemiology: Concepts and Applications , 2006 .

[15]  Raimund Erbel,et al.  Two New Loci for Body-Weight Regulation Identified in a Joint Analysis of Genome-Wide Association Studies for Early-Onset Extreme Obesity in French and German Study Groups , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[16]  H. Willard,et al.  X-inactivation profile reveals extensive variability in X-linked gene expression in females , 2005, Nature.

[17]  Jacqueline K. Wittke-Thompson,et al.  Rational inferences about departures from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. , 2005, American journal of human genetics.