The effect of two grading systems on the performance of medical students during oral examinations.

INTRODUCTION Either a pass/fail approach or a seven-point grading scale are used to evaluate students at the Danish universities. The aim of this study was to explore any effect of the assessment methods on student performances during oral exams. METHODS In a prospective study including 1,037 examinations in three medical subjects, we investigated the difference in the test scores between the spring- and autumn semester. In the spring semester, the students could either pass or fail the subject (pass/fail) while in the following autumn semester, the students were assessed by tiered grading (seven-point grading scale). Unknown to the students, the examiners assessed the students by the seven-point grading scale also in the spring semester. Students at the international classes who were officially assessed by the seven-point grading scale during both semesters served as control group. RESULTS The grading scores were significantly higher among students who were aware of being evaluated with the seven-point grading scores compared with the pass/fail group (p < 0.0001). In comparison, no significant difference between the exam results was observed from the spring- to the autumn semester for the control group (p = 0.45). Moreover, the average mark was higher among the international students (mean = 10.3, on the seven-point grading scale) than in the Danish speaking classes (mean = 9.1). CONCLUSION The seven-point grading scale seems to motivate students to yield a better performance; hence tiered-grading should probably be preferred to a simple pass/fail approach. FUNDING none. TRIAL REGISTRATION not relevant.

[1]  William V. Harper,et al.  Relationship of Pass/Fail Grading and Curriculum Structure With Well-Being Among Preclinical Medical Students: A Multi-Institutional Study , 2011, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[2]  P. Knight,et al.  Assessing learners in higher education , 1998 .

[3]  C. White,et al.  Pass–fail grading: laying the foundation for self-regulated learning , 2010, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[4]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  The Power of Testing Memory Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice , 2006 .

[5]  R. Hughes,et al.  The grading system as a factor in the selection of residents. , 1983, Journal of medical education.

[6]  John M. Jackson,et al.  A Change to Pass/Fail Grading in the First Two Years at One Medical School Results in Improved Psychological Well-Being , 2009, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[7]  M. Hojat,et al.  An empirical study of the predictive validity of number grades in medical school using 3 decades of longitudinal data: implications for a grading system , 2004, Medical education.

[8]  M. Scriven The methodology of evaluation , 1966 .

[9]  Nancy Allen,et al.  Assessment in Higher Education , 1992 .

[10]  C. Kreiter,et al.  An Investigation of the Generalizability of Medical School Grades , 2016, Teaching and learning in medicine.

[11]  H. Merrick,et al.  Pass/fail grading: a disadvantage for students applying for residency. , 1991, American journal of surgery.

[12]  D. Bligh Learning to teach in higher education , 1993 .

[13]  Ari Huhta,et al.  Diagnostic and Formative Assessment , 2008 .

[14]  Marie Schmidt,et al.  Learning to Teach in Higher Education , 1992 .

[15]  J. Provan,et al.  Preferences of program directors for evaluation of candidates for postgraduate training. , 1995, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.