Method for identifying drivers, barriers and synergies related to the deployment of a CO2 pipeline network: A case study for the Iberian Peninsula and Morocco

This paper provides a method to identify drivers, barriers and synergies (DBS) related to the deployment of a CO2 pipeline network. The method was demonstrated for the West Mediterranean region (WMR) (i.e. Spain, Portugal and Morocco). The method comprises a literature review, analysis of embedded pipeline trajectories, interviews with experts, and workshops with stakeholders. Subsequently, the collected information was used to identify route specific DBS in several CO2 pipeline network deployment scenarios that were modeled for the WMR. Most identified DBS apply to CO2 pipeline transport in general. The barriers (e.g. technical knowledge gaps, outstanding legislative issues, lack of financial incentive) can in principle be tackled to make the design, construction and operation of a CO2 pipeline network possible, but could sometimes lead to somewhat higher costs. Furthermore, there are also facilitating processes (e.g. experience with CO2 pipeline transport for EOR). Cost benefits due to pipeline oversizing were identified as a route specific driver, whereas crossings of mountains, water and nature areas are route specific barriers. Installing CO2 pipelines along natural gas pipelines could be either a route specific synergy or barrier, depending on site conditions. Finally, several key measures were proposed to enable CO2 pipeline networks in the future.

[1]  Mark Sanders,et al.  Mobilizing private funds for carbon capture and storage: An exploratory field study in the Netherlands , 2013 .

[2]  Andrea Ramírez,et al.  Improved cost models for optimizing CO2 pipeline configuration for point-to-point pipelines and simple networks , 2014 .

[3]  Machteld van den Broek,et al.  Cost-effective balance between CO2 vessel and pipeline transport: Part II – Design of multimodal CO2 transport: The case of the West Mediterranean region ☆ , 2015 .

[4]  N. Kulichenko,et al.  Carbon Capture and Storage in Developing Countries: A Perspective on Barriers to Deployment , 2012 .

[5]  Emma ter Mors,et al.  It's not only about safety: Beliefs and attitudes of 811 local residents regarding a CCS project in Barendrecht , 2012 .

[6]  Mike Moore,et al.  A Policy, Legal, and Regulatory Evaluation of the Feasibility of a National Pipeline Infrastructure for the Transport and Storage of Carbon Dioxide , 2010 .

[7]  Machteld van den Broek,et al.  Cost-effective balance between CO2 vessel and pipeline transport. Part I – Impact of optimally sized vessels and fleets , 2015 .

[8]  Andrea Ramírez,et al.  Quantitative risk assessment of CO2 transport by pipelines--a review of uncertainties and their impacts. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[9]  André Faaij,et al.  A state-of-the-art review of techno-economic models predicting the costs of CO2 pipeline transport , 2013 .

[10]  Andrea Ramírez,et al.  Feasibility of storing CO2 in the Utsira formation as part of a long term Dutch CCS strategy: An evaluation based on a GIS/MARKAL toolbox , 2010 .

[11]  Andrea Ramírez,et al.  Planning CCS Development in the West Mediterranean , 2013 .

[12]  Sean T. McCoy,et al.  Carbon Capture and Storage and the London Protocol: Recent Efforts to Enable Transboundary CO2 Transfer , 2013 .

[13]  Maryse Labriet,et al.  Prospective scenarios for the adoption of CCS technologies in the Iberian Peninsula , 2013 .

[14]  Andrea Ramírez,et al.  Region specific challenges of a CO2 pipeline infrastructure in the West Mediterranean area Model results versus stakeholder views , 2013 .

[15]  Maryse Labriet,et al.  CCS Infrastructure Development Scenarios for the Integrated Iberian Peninsula and Morocco Energy System , 2013 .

[16]  Sam Holloway,et al.  CCS Directive Transposition into National Laws in Europe: Progress and Problems by the End of 2011 , 2013 .

[17]  Andrea Ramírez,et al.  The influence of risk mitigation measures on the risks, costs and routing of CO2 pipelines , 2014 .