Linking people through physical proximity in a conference

Past research has studied offline proximity such as co-location and online social connections such as friendship individually. People form social relationships based on certain characteristics they possess, called social selection. When people change their social behavior due to interaction with others, social influence is at work. However, few researchers have examined the relationship that exists between offline proximity and online social connection, and the transitions from offline to online and vice versa (O2O). To study this problem, we created a system for finding and connecting with people at a conference that uses offline proximity encounters in order to help attendees meet and connect with each other. Using data where our system was deployed at two conferences, we discover that for social selection, more proximity interactions will result in an increased probability for a person to add another as a social connection (friend, follower or exchanged contact). However, after the social connections are established, more online social interactions result in a decreased duration and frequency of offline interactions between the connected users and social influence is weak. These results are just the first step in understanding how O2O interactions can help link people together, improve friend recommendations, and improve overall user experience.

[1]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Feedback effects between similarity and social influence in online communities , 2008, KDD.

[2]  Eric Paulos,et al.  The familiar stranger: anxiety, comfort, and play in public places , 2004, CHI.

[3]  Chris Arney,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World (Easley, D. and Kleinberg, J.; 2010) [Book Review] , 2013, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[4]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Consumer Participation in Network- and Small-Group-Based Virtual Communities , 2004 .

[5]  Ke Zhang,et al.  Physical Proximity and Online User Behaviour in an Indoor Mobile Social Networking Application , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Internet of Things and 4th International Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing.

[6]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution , 2006, KDD '06.

[7]  Hao Wang,et al.  Enhancing the Experience and Efficiency at a Conference with Mobile Social Networking: Case Study with Find and Connect , 2011 .

[8]  Ciro Cattuto,et al.  Dynamics of Person-to-Person Interactions from Distributed RFID Sensor Networks , 2010, PloS one.

[9]  E. David,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World , 2010 .

[10]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Modeling Dynamical Influence in Human Interaction Patterns , 2010, ArXiv.

[11]  Hao Wang,et al.  Using Physical Context in a Mobile Social Networking Application for Improving Friend Recommendations , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Internet of Things and 4th International Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing.

[12]  Ke Zhang,et al.  Managing Workplace Resources in Office Environments through Ephemeral Social Networks , 2010, UIC.

[13]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Friendship and mobility: user movement in location-based social networks , 2011, KDD.

[14]  Ciro Cattuto,et al.  Social Dynamics in Conferences: Analyses of Data from the Live Social Semantics Application , 2010, SEMWEB.

[15]  Ciro Cattuto,et al.  What's in a crowd? Analysis of face-to-face behavioral networks , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Social sensing for epidemiological behavior change , 2010, UbiComp.

[17]  Prashant Palvia,et al.  The social influence model of technology adoption , 2010, Commun. ACM.

[18]  Lars Backstrom,et al.  Find me if you can: improving geographical prediction with social and spatial proximity , 2010, WWW '10.

[19]  Vassilis Kostakos,et al.  Capturing and visualising Bluetooth encounters , 2008 .

[20]  Edward T. Hall,et al.  A System for the Notation of Proxemic Behavior1 , 1963 .

[21]  John Kelley,et al.  WhozThat? evolving an ecosystem for context-aware mobile social networks , 2008, IEEE Network.

[22]  Ido Guy,et al.  Same places, same things, same people?: mining user similarity on social media , 2010, CSCW '10.

[23]  Alex Pentland,et al.  The social fMRI: measuring, understanding, and designing social mechanisms in the real world , 2011, UbiComp '11.

[24]  Garry Robins,et al.  Network models for social selection processes , 2001, Soc. Networks.

[25]  Luís Felipe M. de Moraes,et al.  Calibration-free WLAN location system based on dynamic mapping of signal strength , 2006, MobiWac '06.

[26]  N. Christakis,et al.  Alone in the Crowd: The Structure and Spread of Loneliness in a Large Social Network , 2009 .

[27]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Social serendipity: mobilizing social software , 2005, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[28]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  Bridging the gap between physical location and online social networks , 2010, UbiComp.

[29]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  FriendSensing: recommending friends using mobile phones , 2009, RecSys '09.

[30]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[31]  Robert Huckfeldt,et al.  Social Contexts, Social Networks, and Urban Neighborhoods: Environmental Constraints on Friendship Choice , 1983, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  Dominik Benz,et al.  Enhancing Social Interactions at Conferences , 2011, it Inf. Technol..

[33]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 1989 .

[34]  David Lazer,et al.  Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.