Pricing and revenue sharing in secondary market of mobile internet access

There is a fast growing number of public spaces offering Wi-Fi access to meet the rising demands for Internet access. It is common for such service to be offered to users at no charge or for a flat fee. Both situations provide very little incentive for Wi-Fi providers to offer better service to the users. Similarly, Wi-Fi providers pay a monthly flat rate to ISP for Internet access and, this too does not incentivize ISP to offer better service to Wi-Fi users. As a result, Wi-Fi users may experience poor connection when network becomes congested during peak hours. In this paper we propose a dynamic pricing scheme for Internet access and a revenue sharing mechanism that provides incentives for both ISP and Wi-Fi providers to offer better service to their users. We build our revenue sharing model based on Shapley value mechanism. Importantly, our proposed revenue sharing mechanism captures the power negotiation between ISP and Wi-Fi providers, and how shifts in power influences revenue division. Specifically, the model assures that the party who contributes more receives a higher portion of the revenue. In addition, our simulation demonstrates that our model captures the bargaining power shifts between Wi-Fi providers and ISP, and shows that the division of revenue asymptotically converges to a percentage value.

[1]  Edith Elkind,et al.  The Shapley Value as a Function of the Quota in Weighted Voting Games , 2011, IJCAI.

[2]  Jianwei Huang,et al.  Can Bilateral ISP Peering Lead to Network-Wide Cooperative Settlement , 2008, 2008 Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks.

[3]  Minghua Chen,et al.  Optimal resource allocation for OFDM uplink communication: A primal-dual approach , 2008, 2008 42nd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems.

[4]  Eric J. Friedman,et al.  Pricing WiFi at Starbucks: issues in online mechanism design , 2003, EC '03.

[5]  Ness B. Shroff,et al.  Non-convex optimization and rate control for multi-class services in the Internet , 2005, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[6]  Vishal Misra,et al.  Internet Economics: The Use of Shapley Value for ISP Settlement , 2007, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[7]  Sangtae Ha,et al.  Secondary markets for mobile data: Feasibility and benefits of traded data plans , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM).

[8]  Benyuan Liu,et al.  Pricing and revenue sharing mechanism for secondary redistribution of data service for mobile devices , 2014, 2014 IEEE 33rd International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC).

[9]  Jianwei Huang,et al.  Optimal pricing for local and global WiFi markets , 2013, 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[10]  Yuan Wu,et al.  Revenue sharing among ISPs in two-sided markets , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[11]  Derong Liu The Mathematics of Internet Congestion Control , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[12]  Vishal Misra,et al.  On Cooperative Settlement Between Content, Transit, and Eyeball Internet Service Providers , 2008, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[13]  Frank Kelly,et al.  Rate control for communication networks: shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[14]  Byung-Guk Kim,et al.  Congestion Control with QoS and Delays Utility Function , 2013, 2013 22nd International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN).