Visualization of the retinal image in an eye model with spherical and aspheric, diffractive, and refractive multifocal intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE To present a method that visually demonstrates how spherical, aspheric, diffractive, and refractive multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) process light received from the cornea. METHODS Monochromatic green light was projected through an Average Cornea Eye (ACE) Model with a cornea in front of the IOL. The model simulates a human cornea with average spherical aberration and visualizes the converging bundle of light leaving the IOL. Additionally, a US Air Force target was projected through the model, and the projected (retinal) image was captured. Various IOLs of differing designs were evaluated using this test setup. Multifocal IOLs included the aspheric diffractive Tecnis ZM900 and ZMA00 lenses; the refractive ReZoom NXG1 lens; the spherical AcrySof ReSTOR SA60D3 apodized diffractive lens; and the spherical diffractive CeeOn 811E lens. Monofocal IOLs included the spherical CeeOnEdge 911A IOL and the aspheric SofPort LI61AO, AcrySof IQ SN60WF, and Tecnis Z9000 and ZA9003 IOLs. RESULTS The light paths of the different diffractive and refractive multifocal IOLs showed the variations in the processing of incoming light, illustrating the functional differences of IOL concepts. The US Air Force target projections in the ACE Model gave an impression of the functional optical quality of the different lenses. The value of this visualization method was demonstrated by comparing the results with modulation transfer function measurements. CONCLUSIONS This visualization technique furthers the understanding of the working principles and quality of the retinal images produced by different mono- and multifocal IOLs.

[1]  Mark Packer,et al.  Multifocal intraocular lenses. , 2006, Ophthalmology clinics of North America.

[2]  Ulrich Mester,et al.  Impact of a modified optic design on visual function: Clinical comparative study , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[3]  P. Piers,et al.  Comparison of wavefront aberrations and optical quality of eyes implanted with five different intraocular lenses. , 2004, Journal of refractive surgery.

[4]  Pablo Artal,et al.  Corneal optical aberrations and retinal image quality in patients in whom monofocal intraocular lenses were implanted. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[5]  Pablo Artal,et al.  Contribution of the cornea and internal surfaces to the change of ocular aberrations with age. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[6]  R. Steinert,et al.  A prospective comparative study of the AMO ARRAY zonal-progressive multifocal silicone intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[7]  Marrie van der Mooren,et al.  A new intraocular lens design to reduce spherical aberration of pseudophakic eyes. , 2002, Journal of refractive surgery.

[8]  A. Franchini Compromise between spherical and chromatic aberration and depth of focus in aspheric intraocular lenses , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[9]  John F Blaylock,et al.  Visual and refractive status at different focal distances after implantation of the ReSTOR multifocal intraocular lens , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[10]  H. Weghaupt,et al.  Reading performance with a refractive multifocal and a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens , 2002, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[11]  J Wollensak,et al.  A prospective evaluation of a diffractive versus a refractive designed multifocal intraocular lens. , 1997, Ophthalmology.

[12]  Li Wang,et al.  Optical aberrations of the human anterior cornea , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[13]  M. Mainster,et al.  The effect of chromatic dispersion on pseudophakic optical performance , 2007, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[14]  T. Kohnen,et al.  Intraindividual comparison of higher‐order aberrations after implantation of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses as a function of pupil diameter , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[15]  Pablo Artal,et al.  Corneal aberrations before and after small-incision cataract surgery. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  H. Kaymak,et al.  Functional outcomes after implantation of Tecnis ZM900 and Array SA40 multifocal intraocular lenses , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[17]  J Wollensak,et al.  Comparison of a diffractive bifocal and a monofocal intraocular lens , 1996, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[18]  N. Mamalis,et al.  New technology IOL optics. , 2006, Ophthalmology clinics of North America.

[19]  M. Chalita,et al.  Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, reading speed, and wavefront analysis: pseudophakic eye with multifocal IOL (ReSTOR) versus fellow phakic eye in non-presbyopic patients. , 2006, Journal of refractive surgery.

[20]  Stephen S. Lane,et al.  Optical performance of 3 intraocular lens designs in the presence of decentration , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[21]  Spherical aberration and coma with an aspherical and a spherical intraocular lens in normal age‐matched eyes , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[22]  Carlos E Souza,et al.  Visual performance of AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive IOL: a prospective comparative trial. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.

[23]  J. Davison,et al.  History and development of the apodized diffractive intraocular lens , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[24]  W. Hütz,et al.  Reading ability with 3 multifocal intraocular lens models , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[25]  Markus Sticker,et al.  Quantitative performance of bifocal and multifocal intraocular lenses in a model eye: point spread function in multifocal intraocular lenses. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[26]  Thomas Kohnen,et al.  European multicenter study of the AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive intraocular lens. , 2006, Ophthalmology.