Flow regime identification methodology with neural networks and two-phase flow models

Vertical two-phase flows often need to be categorized into flow regimes. In each flow regime, flow conditions share similar geometric and hydrodynamic characteristics. Previously, flow regime identification was carried out by flow visualization or instrumental indicators. In this research, to avoid any instrumentation errors and any subjective judgments involved, vertical flow regime identification was performed based on theoretical two-phase flow simulation with supervised and self-organizing neural network systems. Statistics of the two-phase flow impedance were used as input to these systems. They were trained with results from an idealized simulation that was mainly based on Mishima and Ishii's flow regime map, the drift flux model, and the newly developed model of slug flow. These trained systems were verified with impedance signals measured by an impedance void-meter. The results conclusively demonstrate that the neural network systems are appropriate classifiers of vertical flow regimes. The theoretical models and experimental databases used in the simulation are shown to be reliable.

[1]  J. Maxwell A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism , 1873, Nature.

[2]  M. Ishii,et al.  Flow regime transition criteria for upward two-phase flow in vertical tubes , 1984 .

[3]  Owen C. Jones,et al.  The interrelation between void fraction fluctuations and flow patterns in two-phase flow , 1975 .

[4]  O. Jones,et al.  Transient and statistical measurement techniques for two-phase flows: A critical review , 1976 .

[5]  Lefteri H. Tsoukalas,et al.  Vertical two-phase flow identification using advanced instrumentation and neural networks , 1998 .

[6]  Lefteri H. Tsoukalas,et al.  Integration of Neural Networks with Fuzzy Reasoning for Measuring Operational Parameters in a Nuclear Reactor , 1993 .

[7]  Narinder K. Tutu,et al.  Pressure fluctuations and flow pattern recognition in vertical two phase gas-liquid flows , 1982 .

[8]  Mamoru Ishii,et al.  Two-fluid model and hydrodynamic constitutive relations , 1984 .

[9]  Goichi Matsui,et al.  Identification of flow regimes in vertical gas-liquid two-phase flow using differential pressure fluctuations , 1984 .

[10]  H. Lemonnier,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of an impedance void meter to the void distribution in annular flow: a theoretical study , 1991 .

[11]  A. E. Dukler,et al.  Modelling flow pattern transitions for steady upward gas‐liquid flow in vertical tubes , 1980 .

[12]  M. Ishii,et al.  One-dimensional drift-flux model and constitutive equations for relative motion between phases in various two-phase flow regimes , 2003 .

[13]  M. Merilo,et al.  Void Fraction Measurement With a Rotating Electric Field Conductance Gauge , 1977 .

[14]  Kotohiko Sekoguchi,et al.  Void Signal Analysis and Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow Regime Determination by a Statistical Pattern Recognition Method : Fluids Engineering , 1987 .

[15]  N. Zuber,et al.  Average volumetric concentration in two-phase flow systems , 1965 .

[16]  Lefteri H. Tsoukalas,et al.  Hybrid fuzzy-neural flow identification methodology , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE 5th International Fuzzy Systems.

[17]  C. S. Eberle,et al.  Optimization of a one-shot gamma densitometer for measuring area-averaged void fractions of gas-liquid flows in narrow pipelines , 1994 .

[18]  J. S. Archer,et al.  Neural network based objective flow regime identification in air-water two phase flow , 1994 .

[19]  Lefteri H. Tsoukalas,et al.  Fuzzy and neural approaches in engineering , 1997 .