Agent-based Decision Support System for the Third Generation Distributed Dynamic Decision-making (DDD-III) Simulator

Abstract : In this paper, we discuss the design and application of a decision support system (DSS) based on the third-generation distributed dynamic decision-making (DDD-III) simulator and contingency theory to increase the organizational cognitive capacity and to facilitate the processes of adaptation. The role of the DSS is to provide mission-monitoring and re-planning information to human decision-makers (DMs) in order to manage the explicit and tacit knowledge, codify them into simple and meaningful formats, and facilitate rapid transfer of knowledge among the DMs. We present an overview of contingency notions that incorporate three relevant components affecting organizational performance: (1) environment, (2) organizational structure, and (3) strategy, and demonstrate that triggers for organizational adaptation require an integrated multi-dimensional concept of congruence ("fit between the organization and mission environment") incorporating structure-environment, strategy-environment, and strategy-structure matches. Due to the elusive nature of knowledge necessary for efficient and effective organizational adaptation, the knowledge management strategies for efficiently codifying and rapidly transferring the knowledge among DMs is central to achieving superior organizational performance. Our DSS is a suitable test-bed to investigate these processes, and thus provides a means for organizations to gain competitive advantage.

[1]  Krishna R. Pattipati,et al.  A Multi-Agent Decision Framework for DDD-III Environment * , 2003 .

[2]  Børge Obel,et al.  Return on Assets Loss from Situational and Contingency Misfits , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[3]  Yuri N. Levchuk,et al.  Normative Design of Organizations — Part I : Mission Planning , 2001 .

[4]  Alfred Dupont Chandler,et al.  战略与结构 : 美国工商企业成长的若干篇章=strategy and structure : chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise , 1962 .

[5]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[6]  William David Salisbury,et al.  Understanding the influence of organizational change strategies on information technology and knowledge management strategies , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[7]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[8]  Krishna R. Pattipati,et al.  Congruence of Human Organizations and Missions: Theory versus Data , 1999 .

[9]  Yuri N. Levchuk,et al.  Normative Design of Organizations — Part II : Organizational Structure , 2001 .

[10]  Lex Donaldson,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL PORTFOLIO THEORY: PERFORMANCE‐DRIVEN ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE , 2000 .

[11]  David L. Kleinman,et al.  Scenario Design for the Empirical Testing of Organizational Congruence , 2003 .

[12]  Krishna R. Pattipati,et al.  Normative design of organizations. I. Mission planning , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[13]  Shlomo Zilberstein,et al.  Models of Bounded Rationality , 1995 .

[14]  Krishna R. Pattipati,et al.  Normative design of organizations. II. Organizational structure , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.