A community approach to the cancer-variant-interpretation bottleneck

[1]  O. Griffith,et al.  Standards for the classification of pathogenicity of somatic variants in cancer (oncogenicity): Joint recommendations of Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen), Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC), and Variant Interpretation for Cancer Consortium (VICC). , 2022, Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics.

[2]  Christopher G Chute,et al.  The Human Phenotype Ontology in 2021 , 2020, Nucleic Acids Res..

[3]  Alex H. Wagner,et al.  A harmonized meta-knowledgebase of clinical interpretations of somatic genomic variants in cancer , 2020, Nature Genetics.

[4]  Subha Madhavan,et al.  Standard operating procedure for curation and clinical interpretation of variants in cancer , 2019, Genome Medicine.

[5]  Aleksandar Milosavljevic,et al.  ClinGen Allele Registry links information about genetic variants , 2018, Human mutation.

[6]  Joshua F. McMichael,et al.  Adapting crowdsourced clinical cancer curation in CIViC to the ClinGen minimum variant level data community‐driven standards , 2018, Human mutation.

[7]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  CIViC is a community knowledgebase for expert crowdsourcing the clinical interpretation of variants in cancer , 2017, Nature Genetics.

[8]  Marilyn M. Li,et al.  Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation and Reporting of Sequence Variants in Cancer: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists. , 2017, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[9]  H. Rehm,et al.  Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology , 2015, Genetics in Medicine.

[10]  Jinghui Zhang,et al.  Reply to Artifacts in the data of Hu et al. , 2015, Nature Genetics.