Managing Know-How

We study how firms can use a knowledge management system to optimally leverage employee-generated know-how. In particular, we consider the following practical strategic questions for the manager of a knowledge-intensive firm: Should her firm develop a formal knowledge system? And if so, how should it be managed, particularly in terms of what information to record? We find that firms benefit more from a knowledge system when they are larger, face the same issues more frequently, have higher turnover, and face problems about which there is less general knowledge. In terms of what information to record, a key insight is that recording moderately successful practices can be counterproductive, because doing so may inefficiently reduce employees' incentives to experiment. This “strong-form competency trap” forces firms into an exploration--exploitation trade-off. Firms that value a knowledge system most should also be most selective in recording information. We further find that recording successes is more valuable than recording failures, which supports firms' focus on best practice. Beyond these main principles, we also show that it may be optimal to disseminate know-how on a plant level but not on a firm level, and that recording backup solutions is most valuable at medium levels of environmental change.

[1]  Cheryl Gaimon,et al.  Managing Knowledge-Based Resource Capabilities Under Uncertainty , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[2]  J. March,et al.  Organizational Learning , 2008 .

[3]  Morris H. DeGroot,et al.  Some Problems of Optimal Stopping , 1968 .

[4]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[5]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Cultivating Capabilities to Innovate: Booz.Allen & Hamilton , 1997 .

[6]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Speed and Search: Designing Organizations for Turbulence and Complexity , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[7]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[8]  B. Jullien,et al.  OPTIMAL LEARNING BY EXPERIMENTATION , 1991 .

[9]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[10]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization , 1990 .

[11]  W. R. Thompson.  ON THE LIKELIHOOD THAT ONE UNKNOWN PROBABILITY EXCEEDS ANOTHER IN VIEW OF THE EVIDENCE OF TWO SAMPLES , 1933 .

[12]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation , 1995 .

[13]  P. Bolton,et al.  The firm as a communication network , 1994 .

[14]  Susan Athey,et al.  The Value of Information in Monotone Decision Problems , 1998 .

[15]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Team New Zealand (A) , 1996 .

[16]  Olav Sorenson,et al.  Interdependence and Adaptability: Organizational Learning and the Long - Term Effect of Integration , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[17]  A. MacCormack,et al.  Siemens ShareNet: Building a Knowledge Network , 2002 .

[18]  Gustavo Stubrich.  The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization , 1993 .

[19]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  Optimal search on a technology landscape , 2000 .

[20]  Ronald W. Hilton.  The Determinants of Information Value: Synthesizing Some General Results , 1981 .

[21]  Linda Argote,et al.  Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Pankaj Ghemawat,et al.  Building Strategy on the Experience Curve : Harvard Business Review , 1987 .

[23]  K. R. Conner.  A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm? , 1991 .

[24]  Boyan Jovanovic,et al.  Learning By Doing and the Choice of Technology , 1994 .

[25]  M. Rothschild.  A two-armed bandit theory of market pricing , 1974 .

[26]  E. Steen,et al.  Organizational Beliefs and Managerial Vision , 2005 .

[27]  A. Alchian.  Reliability of Progress Curves in Airframe Production , 1963 .

[28]  J. Bather,et al.  Multi‐Armed Bandit Allocation Indices , 1990 .

[29]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[30]  R. Radner,et al.  Economic theory of teams , 1972 .

[31]  M. Weitzman.  Optimal search for the best alternative , 1978 .

[32]  S. Sitkin.  Learning Through Failure : The Strategy of Small Losses , 1992 .

[33]  C. Holsapple.  Handbook on Knowledge Management 1 , 2004, International Handbooks on Information Systems.

[34]  Edward D. Hess,et al.  Mcdonald's Corporation , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[35]  Gustavo Manso.  Motivating Innovation , 2010 .

[37]  Carla O'Dell,et al.  If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices , 1998 .

[38]  Wouter Dessein,et al.  When Does Coordination Require Centralization? , 2006 .

[39]  Scott Stern,et al.  Biological Resource Centers: Knowledge Hubs for the Life Sciences , 2004 .

[40]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Temporarily Divide to Conquer: Centralized, Decentralized, and Reintegrated Organizational Approaches to Exploration and Adaptation , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[41]  Jerker Denrell,et al.  Selection bias and the perils of benchmarking. , 2005, Harvard business review.

[42]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  FRUITS OF FAILURE: ORGANIZATIONAL FAILURE AND POPULATION LEVEL LEARNING. , 1996 .

[43]  Robert M. Morgan,et al.  The Role of Existing Knowledge in New Product Innovativeness and Performance , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[44]  Timothy Van Zandt,et al.  Real-Time Decentralized Information Processing as a Model of Organizations with Boundedly Rational Agents , 1999 .

[45]  P. W. Jones,et al.  Bandit Problems, Sequential Allocation of Experiments , 1987 .

[46]  N. Foss.  Knowledge-Based Approaches to the Theory of the Firm: Some Critical Comments , 1996 .

[47]  R. Radner.  The organization of decentralized information processing , 1993 .

[48]  A. Edmondson,et al.  Confronting Failure: Antecedents and Consequences of Shared Beliefs About Failure in Organizational Work Groups , 2001 .

[49]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Behind the learning curve: a sketch of the learning process , 1991 .

[50]  L. Argote.  Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge , 1999 .

[51]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational Design , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[52]  S. Kauffman,et al.  Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.

[53]  Boyan Jovanovic.  Job Matching and the Theory of Turnover , 1979, Journal of Political Economy.

[54]  Klaus Adam.  Learning While Searching for the Best Alternative , 2001, J. Econ. Theory.

[55]  Luis Garicano,et al.  Hierarchies and the Organization of Knowledge in Production , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[56]  Daniel A. Levinthal.  Adaptation on rugged landscapes , 1997 .

[57]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Temporarily Divide to Conquer: Centralized, Decentralized, and Reintegrated Organizational Approaches to Exploration and Adaptation , 2003 .

[58]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.