Detecting high-frequency hearing loss with click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

In contrast to clinical click-evoked otoacoustic emission (CEOAE) tests that are inaccurate above 4-5 kHz, a research procedure measured CEOAEs up to 16 kHz in 446 ears and predicted the presence/absence of a sensorineural hearing loss. The behavioral threshold test that served as a reference to evaluate CEOAE test accuracy used a yes-no task in a maximum-likelihood adaptive procedure. This test was highly efficient between 0.5 and 12.7 kHz: Thresholds measured in 2 min per frequency had a median standard deviation (SD) of 1.2-1.5 dB across subjects. CEOAE test performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The mean AUC from 1 to 10 kHz was 0.90 (SD=0.016). AUC decreased to 0.86 at 12.7 kHz and to 0.7 at 0.5 and 16 kHz, possibly due in part to insufficient stimulus levels. Between 1 and 12.7 kHz, the medians of the magnitude difference in CEOAEs and in behavioral thresholds were <4 dB. The improved CEOAE test performance above 4-5 kHz was due to retaining the portion of the CEOAE response with latencies as short as 0.3 ms. Results have potential clinical significance in predicting hearing status from at least 1 to 10 kHz using a single CEOAE response.

[1]  Walt Jesteadt,et al.  Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions to investigate efferent and cochlear contributions to temporal overshoot. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  D. Kemp Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  M. J. McCoy,et al.  Time‐Windowing of Click‐Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions to Increase Signal‐to‐Noise Ratio , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[4]  M P Gorga,et al.  Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Patients with Normal Hearing and in Patients with Hearing Loss , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[5]  D H Keefe,et al.  Double-evoked otoacoustic emissions. II. Intermittent noise rejection, calibration and ear-canal measurements. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Laura Elizabeth Dreisbach,et al.  Repeatability of High-Frequency Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Normal-Hearing Adults , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[7]  Douglas H. Keefe,et al.  Double-evoked otoacoustic emissions. I. Measurement theory and nonlinear coherence , 1998 .

[8]  W. Jędrzejczak,et al.  Otoacoustic emissions evoked by 0.5 kHz tone bursts. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  S. Neely,et al.  From Laboratory to Clinic: A Large Scale Study of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Ears with Normal Hearing and Ears with Hearing Loss , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[10]  Christopher A Shera,et al.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  D T Kemp,et al.  Acoustic emission cochleography--practical aspects. , 1986, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[12]  D. M. Green,et al.  A maximum-likelihood method for estimating thresholds in a yes-no task. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Denis F. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Sound-Conduction Effects on Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Screening Outcomes in Newborn Infants: Test Performance of Wideband Acoustic Transfer Functions and 1-kHz Tympanometry , 2009, Ear and hearing.

[14]  P. Avan,et al.  Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and the influence of high-frequency hearing losses in humans. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Denis F. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Input-output functions for stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adult ears. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  D. Stapells,et al.  Frequency-specific identification of hearing loss using transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions to clicks and tones , 1996, Hearing Research.

[17]  R. M. Hurley,et al.  Effectiveness of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) in predicting hearing level. , 1994, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[18]  M R Leek,et al.  Experience with a yes-no single-interval maximum-likelihood procedure. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Frederick Mosteller,et al.  Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis , 1983 .

[20]  Denis F. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Wideband absorbance tympanometry using pressure sweeps: system development and results on adults with normal hearing. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  W Jesteadt,et al.  Analysis of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Ray Meddis,et al.  A simple single-interval adaptive procedure for estimating thresholds in normal and impaired listeners. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  D M Green,et al.  Further studies of a maximum-likelihood yes-no procedure. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  D. H. Keefe,et al.  Audiometric Predictions Using Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions and Middle Ear Measurements , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[25]  Denis F. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Wideband acoustic-reflex test in a test battery to predict middle-ear dysfunction , 2010, Hearing Research.

[26]  Walt Jesteadt,et al.  High-frequency click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and behavioral thresholds in humans. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  M. Pepe The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction , 2003 .

[28]  W Jesteadt,et al.  A comparison of transient-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy , 1986 .

[30]  D T Kemp,et al.  A Guide to the Effective Use of Otoacoustic Emissions , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[31]  Clemens Reimann,et al.  Background and threshold: critical comparison of methods of determination. , 2005, The Science of the total environment.