Dynamic Functional Organization of Language

One of the oldest questions in cognitive science is whether cognitive operations are modular or distributed across domains. We propose that fMRI has made a unique contribution to this question by elucidating the nature of structure–function relations. We focus our discussion on language, which is the classic domain for arguments in favor of domain specificity and a fixed neural architecture. We argue that fMRI has provided evidence for the idea that there is a dynamic functional architecture, rather than a fixed neural architecture, that emerges across the lifespan, pursuant to injury and in response to language experience. We use empirical examples to highlight how fMRI has helped restructure theory by shedding light on how functionally distinct modular components of the grammar can recruit some of the same neural regions, how areas considered to be domain-specific may be recruited in a domain-general fashion, and how language network specialization and left lateralization dynamically emerge in response to experience. fMRI provides a window into neural plasticity and dynamic functional organization not easily afforded by behavior alone.

[1]  Cathy J. Price,et al.  A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading , 2012, NeuroImage.

[2]  M. Hallett,et al.  Activation of the primary visual cortex by Braille reading in blind subjects , 1996, Nature.

[3]  Margaret A. Naeser,et al.  TMS suppression of right pars triangularis, but not pars opercularis, improves naming in aphasia , 2011, Brain and Language.

[4]  Roy H. Hamilton,et al.  The right hemisphere is not unitary in its role in aphasia recovery , 2012, Cortex.

[5]  S. Scott,et al.  Functional Integration across Brain Regions Improves Speech Perception under Adverse Listening Conditions , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Gregory Hickok,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of language. , 2009, Physics of life reviews.

[7]  R. Saxe,et al.  Language processing in the occipital cortex of congenitally blind adults , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Superior Temporal SulcusIt's My Area: Or Is It? , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Maturation of the Language Network: From Inter- to Intrahemispheric Connectivities , 2011, PloS one.

[10]  C K Thompson,et al.  Neuroplasticity: evidence from aphasia. , 2000, Journal of communication disorders.

[11]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Retrieval and unification of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an FMRI study using word-category ambiguity. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  Patrick C. M. Wong,et al.  Large-scale Cortical Network Properties Predict Future Sound-to-Word Learning Success , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  D. Poeppel,et al.  The cortical organization of speech processing , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[14]  Cynthia K. Thompson,et al.  Neuroimaging and recovery of language in aphasia , 2008, Current neurology and neuroscience reports.

[15]  D. Perani,et al.  Neural language networks at birth , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  S. Pinker,et al.  The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language , 1994 .

[17]  E. Kaan,et al.  The brain circuitry of syntactic comprehension , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  S. Pinker The language instinct : how the mind creates language , 1995 .

[19]  M. Raichle,et al.  Adaptive changes in early and late blind: a FMRI study of verb generation to heard nouns. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Peter E Turkeltaub,et al.  Are networks for residual language function and recovery consistent across aphasic patients? , 2011, Neurology.

[21]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[22]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[23]  William W. Graves,et al.  Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Neuroimaging of Language: Why Hasn't a Clearer Picture Emerged? , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[25]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory , 1993, Nature.

[26]  M Corbetta,et al.  Preserved speech abilities and compensation following prefrontal damage. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  W. Levelt,et al.  The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components , 2004, Cognition.

[28]  Sheila E. Blumstein,et al.  Auditory Word Recognition: Evidence from Aphasia and Functional Neuroimaging , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[29]  S. Pinker The Language Instinct , 1994 .

[30]  Norihiro Sadato,et al.  How the Blind “See” Braille: Lessons From Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2005, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[31]  C. Price,et al.  Right anterior superior temporal activation predicts auditory sentence comprehension following aphasic stroke. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  M. Just,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Science.

[33]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Functional specificity for high-level linguistic processing in the human brain , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Lucie Hertz-Pannier,et al.  Nature and nurture in language acquisition: anatomical and functional brain-imaging studies in infants , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[35]  Yosef Grodzinsky,et al.  The Picture of the Linguistic Brain: How Sharp Can It Be? Reply to Fedorenko & Kanwisher , 2010, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[36]  Sophie K. Scott,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of prelexical processing in speech perception , 2004, Cognition.

[37]  Emily B. Myers,et al.  Inferior Frontal Regions Underlie the Perception of Phonetic Category Invariance , 2009, Psychological science.

[38]  J. Desmond,et al.  Functional Specialization for Semantic and Phonological Processing in the Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex , 1999, NeuroImage.

[39]  Elizabeth Redcay,et al.  Functional neuroimaging of speech perception during a pivotal period in language acquisition. , 2008, Developmental science.

[40]  Yosef Grodzinsky,et al.  Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[41]  Tyler K. Perrachione,et al.  Neural characteristics of successful and less successful speech and word learning in adults , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[42]  M. Farah,et al.  Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  C. Weiller,et al.  Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[44]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Neural language networks at birth (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2011) 108, 38 (16056-16061) DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1102991108) , 2011 .