A cross-disciplinary framework for the description of contextually mediated change

We present a mathematical framework (referred to as Context-driven Actualization of Potential, or CAP) for describing how entities change over time under the influence of a context. The approach facilitates comparison of change of state of entities studied in different disciplines. Processes are seen to differ according to the degree of nondeterminism, and the degree to which they are sensitive to, internalize, and depend upon a particular context. Our analysis suggests that the dynamical evolution of a quantum entity described by the Schrodinger equation is not fundamentally different from change provoked by a measurement often referred to as collapse, but a limiting case, with only one way to collapse. The biological transition to coded replication is seen as a means of preserving structure in the fact of context-driven change, and sextual replication as a means of increasing potentiality thus enhancing diversity through interaction with context. The framework sheds light on concepts like selection and fitness, reveals how exceptional Darwinian evolution is as a means of 'change of state', and clarifies in what sense culture, and the creative process underlying it, are Darwinian.

[1]  D. J. Foulis,et al.  The Operational Approach to Quantum Mechanics , 1978 .

[2]  S. Gould Bully for brontosaurus : reflections in natural history , 1991 .

[3]  Carle C. Zimmerman,et al.  Social Change in Developing Areas, A Reinterpretation of Evolutionary Theory , 1996 .

[4]  W. P. Briggs Foundation for the future. , 1955, The Merck report.

[5]  C. Piron,et al.  Mécanique quantique : bases et applications , 1998 .

[6]  D. Simonton Creativity as Blind Variation and Selective Retention : Is the Creative Process Darwinian ? , 2022 .

[7]  P. Ao,et al.  Laws in Darwinian Evolutionary Theory , 2005, ArXiv.

[8]  D. Simonton Origins of genius : Darwinian perspectives on creativity , 1999 .

[9]  David J. Foulis,et al.  What are Quantum Logics and What Ought They to be , 1981 .

[10]  D. Campbell Variation and Selective retention in Socio-Cultural Evolution , 1965 .

[11]  David H. Helman,et al.  Evolutionary Epistemology, Rationality, and the Sociology of Knowledge , 1989 .

[12]  A. Minelli BIO , 2009, Evolution & Development.

[13]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Contextualizing Concepts , 2002, FLAIRS.

[14]  Swee-Ping Chia,et al.  AIP Conference Proceedings , 2008 .

[15]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  ORIGINS OF ORDER , 2019, Origins of Order.

[16]  S. Berman,et al.  Nuovo Cimento , 1983 .

[17]  D. J. Foulis,et al.  A Mathematical Setting for Inductive Reasoning , 1976 .

[18]  Diederik Aerts BEING AND CHANGE: FOUNDATIONS OF A REALISTIC OPERATIONAL FORMALISM , 2002 .

[19]  Charles E. Taylor,et al.  Artificial Life II , 1991 .

[20]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Towards a quantum evolutionary scheme: violating Bell's inequalities in language , 2004 .

[21]  John von Neumann,et al.  Theory Of Self Reproducing Automata , 1967 .

[22]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  From Changes in the World to Changes in the Words: Lexical Adaptation , 2004, quant-ph/0407150.

[23]  Gertrudis Van de Vijver,et al.  Closure : emergent organizations and their dynamics , 2000 .

[24]  I. Pitowsky Quantum Probability ― Quantum Logic , 1989 .

[25]  G. Ferro-Luzzi On Evolutionary Epistemology , 1982, Current Anthropology.

[26]  E. Schrödinger What is life? : the physical aspect of the living cell , 1944 .