Food Recruitment Information can Spatially Redirect Employed Stingless Bee Foragers

Within a rewarding floral patch, eusocial bee foragers frequently switch sites, going from one flower to another. However, site switching between patches tends to occur with low frequency while a given patch is still rewarding, thus reducing pollen dispersal and gene flow between patches. In principle, forager switching and gene flow between patches could be higher when close patches offer similar rewards. We investigated site switching during food recruitment in the stingless bee Scaptotrigona mexicana. Thus, we trained three groups of foragers to three feeders in different locations, one group per location. These groups did not interact each other during the training phase. Next, interaction among trained foragers was allowed. We found that roughly half of the foragers switched sites, the other half remaining faithful to its training feeder. Switching is influenced by the presence of recruitment information. In the absence of recruitment information (bees visiting and recruiting for feeders), employed foragers were site specific. Foragers only switched among feeders that were being visited and recruited to. Switching was not caused by learned aversion to experimental handling. Switching in response to recruitment could provide a fitness benefit to the colony by facilitating rapid switching among exploited patches and provide a benefit of increasing plant gene flow between patches.

[1]  J. Nieh,et al.  Experience-based interpretation of visual and chemical information at food sources in the stingless bee Scaptotrigona mexicana , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  L. Harder,et al.  Function and Evolution of Aggregated Pollen in Angiosperms , 2008, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[3]  J. Nieh,et al.  Effect of forager-deposited odors on the intra-patch accuracy of recruitment of the stingless bees Melipona panamica and Partamona peckolti (Apidae, Meliponini) , 2007, Apidologie.

[4]  J. G. Burns,et al.  The Birds, the Bees, and the Virtual Flowers: Can Pollinator Behavior Drive Ecological Speciation in Flowering Plants?* , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[5]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Distinguishing signals and cues: bumblebees use general footprints to generate adaptive behaviour at flowers and nest , 2007, Arthropod-Plant Interactions.

[6]  F. B. Kraus,et al.  Experience, but not distance, influences the recruitment precision in the stingless bee Scaptotrigona mexicana , 2007, Naturwissenschaften.

[7]  J. Biesmeijer,et al.  Recruitment and communication of food source location in three species of stingless bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini) , 2005 .

[8]  J. Nieh,et al.  High precision during food recruitment of experienced (reactivated) foragers in the stingless bee Scaptotrigona mexicana (Apidae, Meliponini) , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[9]  J. Nieh Recruitment communication in stingless bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini) , 2004 .

[10]  Jacobus C. Biesmeijer,et al.  Information flow and organization of stingless bee foraging , 2004 .

[11]  J. Biesmeijer,et al.  The use of field–based social information in eusocial foragers: local enhancement among nestmates and heterospecifics in stingless bees , 2003 .

[12]  V. M. Schmidt,et al.  A stingless bee marks the feeding site in addition to the scent path (Scaptotrigona aff. depilis) , 2003 .

[13]  R. Gegear,et al.  Behavioural assessment of visual acuity in bumblebees (Bombus impatiens). , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[14]  Thomas D. Seeley,et al.  Imprecision in waggle dances of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) for nearby food sources: error or adaptation? , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[15]  Jacobus C. Biesmeijer,et al.  Social foraging in stingless bees: how colonies of Melipona fasciata choose among nectar sources , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[16]  James C. Nieh,et al.  Potential mechanisms for the communication of height and distance by a stingless bee, Melipona panamica , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[17]  T. Seeley,et al.  Collective decision-making in honey bees: how colonies choose among nectar sources , 1991, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[18]  M. Hansell Ecology and Natural History of Tropical Bees, David W. Roubik. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989), x, +514. Price £50.00 , 1990 .

[19]  William F. Towne,et al.  The spatial precision of the honey bees' dance communication , 1988, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[20]  D. Levin,et al.  POLLINATOR FLIGHT DIRECTIONALITY AND ITS EFFECT ON POLLEN FLOW , 1971, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  Broome,et al.  Literature cited , 1924, A Guide to the Carnivores of Central America.

[22]  M. Lehrer,et al.  Spatial acuity of honeybee vision and its spectral properties , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[23]  F. Barth,et al.  On the origin and properties of scent marks deposited at the food source by a stingless bee, Melipona seminigra , 2004 .

[24]  J. Osborne,et al.  Site constancy of bumble bees in an experimentally patchy habitat , 2001 .

[25]  D. Levin Dispersal Versus Gene Flow in Plants , 1981 .