Automatic x‐ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto‐optimization

Abstract Purpose Insufficient image contrast associated with radiation therapy daily setup x‐ray images could negatively affect accurate patient treatment setup. We developed a method to perform automatic and user‐independent contrast enhancement on 2D kilo voltage (kV) and megavoltage (MV) x‐ray images. The goal was to provide tissue contrast optimized for each treatment site in order to support accurate patient daily treatment setup and the subsequent offline review. Methods The proposed method processes the 2D x‐ray images with an optimized image processing filter chain, which consists of a noise reduction filter and a high‐pass filter followed by a contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE) filter. The most important innovation is to optimize the image processing parameters automatically to determine the required image contrast settings per disease site and imaging modality. Three major parameters controlling the image processing chain, i.e., the Gaussian smoothing weighting factor for the high‐pass filter, the block size, and the clip limiting parameter for the CLAHE filter, were determined automatically using an interior‐point constrained optimization algorithm. Results Fifty‐two kV and MV x‐ray images were included in this study. The results were manually evaluated and ranked with scores from 1 (worst, unacceptable) to 5 (significantly better than adequate and visually praise worthy) by physicians and physicists. The average scores for the images processed by the proposed method, the CLAHE, and the best window‐level adjustment were 3.92, 2.83, and 2.27, respectively. The percentage of the processed images received a score of 5 were 48, 29, and 18%, respectively. Conclusion The proposed method is able to outperform the standard image contrast adjustment procedures that are currently used in the commercial clinical systems. When the proposed method is implemented in the clinical systems as an automatic image processing filter, it could be useful for allowing quicker and potentially more accurate treatment setup and facilitating the subsequent offline review and verification.

[1]  Michael G. Herman,et al.  CLINICAL USE OF ON-LINE PORTAL IMAGING FOR DAILY PATIENT TREATMENT VERIFICATION , 1994 .

[2]  Hamid R. Tizhoosh,et al.  Knowledge-based enhancement of megavoltage images in radiation therapy using a hybrid neuro-fuzzy system , 2001, Image Vis. Comput..

[3]  Seung Jong Kim,et al.  Determining Parameters in Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization , 2013 .

[4]  Georgia D. Koutsouri,et al.  Image contrast enhancement through regional application of partitioned iterated function systems , 2013, J. Electronic Imaging.

[5]  Moon Gi Kang,et al.  Contrast enhancement algorithm considering surrounding information by illumination image , 2014, J. Electronic Imaging.

[6]  M G Herman,et al.  Clinical use of on-line portal imaging for daily patient treatment verification. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  K. Leszczynski,et al.  The enhancement of radiotherapy verification images by an automated edge detection technique. , 1992, Medical physics.

[8]  G. Starkschall,et al.  American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning. , 1998, Medical physics.

[9]  M. H. Wright.  The interior-point revolution in optimization: History, recent developments, and lasting consequences , 2004 .

[10]  S. Pizer,et al.  Portal film enhancement: technique and clinical utility. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Grant T. Gullberg,et al.  The use of computer-assisted diagnosis in cardiac perfusion nuclear medicine studies: A review (Part 2) , 1993, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[12]  B. Fallone,et al.  A robust morphological algorithm for automatic radiation field extraction and correlation of portal images. , 1994, Medical physics.

[13]  B G Fallone,et al.  Contrast enhancement of portal images by selective histogram equalization. , 1993, Medical physics.

[14]  J. Robar,et al.  Megavoltage image contrast with low-atomic number target materials and amorphous silicon electronic portal imagers , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  D. Jaffray,et al.  Advances in image-guided radiation therapy. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  Ali M. Reza,et al.  Realization of the Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE) for Real-Time Image Enhancement , 2004, J. VLSI Signal Process..

[17]  Volker Schatz,et al.  Low-latency histogram equalization for infrared image sequences: a hardware implementation , 2013, Journal of Real-Time Image Processing.

[18]  J. Alex Stark,et al.  Adaptive image contrast enhancement using generalizations of histogram equalization , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[19]  Bram van Ginneken,et al.  Anniversary paper: image processing and manipulation through the pages of Medical Physics. , 2008, Medical physics.

[20]  Sheng Wu,et al.  Study on Construction of a Medical X-Ray Direct Digital Radiography System and Hybrid Preprocessing Methods , 2014, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[21]  Wang Jun,et al.  Combination of contrast limited adaptive histogram equalisation and discrete wavelet transform for image enhancement , 2015, IET Image Process..

[22]  M van Herk,et al.  Automatic on-line inspection of patient setup in radiation therapy using digital portal images. , 1993, Medical physics.

[23]  Dong Kyun Lim,et al.  A Novel Method of Determining Parameters of CLAHE Based on Image Entropy , 2013 .

[24]  H. Harold Li,et al.  A Method to Recognize Anatomical Site and Image Acquisition View in X-ray Images , 2017, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[25]  Wei Lu,et al.  Technical note: deformable image registration on partially matched images for radiotherapy applications. , 2009, Medical physics.

[26]  D Verellen,et al.  On-line portal imaging: image quality defining parameters for pelvic fields--a clinical evaluation. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  H Alasti,et al.  Portal imaging for evaluation of daily on-line setup errors and off-line organ motion during conformal irradiation of carcinoma of the prostate. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  Shashi B. Rana,et al.  Performance Evaluation of HE, AHE and Fuzzy Image Enhancement , 2015 .