Super-Drizzle: Applications of Adaptive Kernel Regression in Astronomical Imaging

Abstract : The drizzle algorithm is a widely used tool for image enhancement in the astronomical literature. For example, a very popular implementation of this method, as studied by Frutcher and Hook, has been used to fuse, denoise, and increase the spatial resolution of the images captured by the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). However, the drizzle algorithm is an ad-hoc method, equivalent to a spatially adaptive linear filter, which limits its range of performance. To improve the performance of the drizzle algorithm, we make contact with the field of non-parametric statistics and generalize the tools and results for use in image processing and reconstruction. In contrast to the parametric methods, which rely on a specific model of the signal of interest, non-parametric methods rely on the data itself to dictate the structure of the model, in which case this implicit model is referred to as a regression function. We promote the use and improve upon a class of non-parametric methods called kernel regression.

[1]  Susan A. Murphy,et al.  Monographs on statistics and applied probability , 1990 .

[2]  A. S. Fruchter,et al.  Drizzle: A Method for the Linear Reconstruction of Undersampled Images , 1998 .

[3]  E. Nadaraya On Estimating Regression , 1964 .

[4]  Terrance E. Boult,et al.  Efficient super-resolution via image warping , 2000, Image Vis. Comput..

[5]  R. Bates,et al.  Towards true imaging by wideband speckle interferometry , 1980 .

[6]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  A Review of Image Denoising Algorithms, with a New One , 2005, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[7]  Michael Elad,et al.  On the origin of the bilateral filter and ways to improve it , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[8]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  Kernel Regression for Image Processing and Reconstruction , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  Michael Elad,et al.  Fast and Robust Multi-Frame Super-Resolution , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  Erez N. Ribak,et al.  Self-calibrating shift-and-add technique for speckle imaging , 1986 .

[11]  Michael Elad,et al.  Fast and robust multiframe super resolution , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  Michael Elad,et al.  A fast super-resolution reconstruction algorithm for pure translational motion and common space-invariant blur , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[13]  R. H. T. Bates,et al.  Augmenting shift-and-add with zero-and-add , 1986 .

[14]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  SUSAN—A New Approach to Low Level Image Processing , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[15]  P. Milanfar,et al.  Multiscale principal components analysis for image local orientation estimation , 2002, Conference Record of the Thirty-Sixth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2002..

[16]  Roberto Manduchi,et al.  Bilateral filtering for gray and color images , 1998, Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271).

[17]  C. Westin,et al.  Normalized and differential convolution , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[18]  Klamer Schutte,et al.  Robust Fusion of Irregularly Sampled Data Using Adaptive Normalized Convolution , 2006, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[19]  M. Wand,et al.  Multivariate Locally Weighted Least Squares Regression , 1994 .

[20]  Bernard W. Silverman,et al.  Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis , 1987 .

[21]  Erez N. Ribak,et al.  Astronomical imaging by filtered weighted-shift-and-add technique , 1986 .

[22]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Mean Shift: A Robust Approach Toward Feature Space Analysis , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[23]  N. K. Bose,et al.  High resolution image formation from low resolution frames using Delaunay triangulation , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..