For and against? An exploration of inadvertent influences of policies on KIBS industries in the Finnish policy setting

Knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) are a key sector in any knowledge economy, and as such they are subject to multiple policy influences. This article considers the inadvertent impacts of policies on KIBS, using examples drawn from the policy setting in Finland. The key elements of the policy environment are described, with particular attention to innovation policy and small and medium enterprise support policies. The direct and indirect effects of public policies on KIBS are explored with particular attention to effects on innovativeness. The role of research and training organisations as a semi-competitor of KIBS is highlighted. The examples analysed suggest that policy has simultaneously both positive and negative impacts on the innovativeness of KIBS industries.

[1]  Björn Wootz,et al.  A framework of industrial buying and selling , 1979 .

[2]  Paul Geroski,et al.  INNOVATION, TECHNOLOGICAL OPPORTUNITY, AND MARKET STRUCTURE , 1990 .

[3]  W. Coffey,et al.  Producer Services and Flexible Production: An Exploratory Analysis , 1991 .

[4]  Andrew Sayer,et al.  The New Social Economy: Reworking the Division of Labor , 1991 .

[5]  P. N. O'Farrell,et al.  An Interaction Model of Business Service Production and Consumption , 1991 .

[6]  Andrew Sayer,et al.  The New Social Economy: Reworking the Division of Labor , 1991 .

[7]  Faïz Gallouj,et al.  The Provider-Customer Interface in Business and Professional Services: Moment of Truth, Moment of Thrust , 1992 .

[8]  The use of external assistance by mature SMEs in the UK: some policy implications , 1993 .

[9]  M. Alpers,et al.  Research and Development , 1960, Nature.

[10]  Peter Daniels,et al.  Business Link, Strong Ties, and the Walls of Silence: Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and External Business-Service Expertise , 1998 .

[11]  N. Nummela,et al.  Market Orientation for the Public Sector Providing Expert Services for SMEs , 1998 .

[12]  Stephen Roper,et al.  The Determinants of Innovation: R & D, Technology Transfer and Networking Effects , 1999 .

[13]  Robert J. Bennett,et al.  The use of external business advice by SMEs in Britain , 1999 .

[14]  Mrugank V. Thakor,et al.  What is a professional service? A conceptual review and bi‐national investigation , 2000 .

[15]  Jon Sundbo,et al.  Innovation as a loosely coupled system in services , 2000, Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manag..

[16]  J. Vickers,et al.  Competition, Imitation and Growth with Step-by-Step Innovation , 2001 .

[17]  P. Hertog,et al.  Innovative clusters: drivers of national innovation systems , 2001 .

[18]  A. Zenker,et al.  Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: the role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems , 2001 .

[19]  T. Lemola.  Convergence of national science and technology policies: the case of Finland , 2002 .

[20]  Pim Den Hertog,et al.  Co-producers of Innovation: On the Role of Knowledge-intensive Business Services in Innovation , 2002 .

[21]  Ian Miles,et al.  Knowledge Intensive Services' Suppliers and Clients , 2003 .

[22]  Luke Georghiou,et al.  Evaluation of the Finnish innovation support system , 2003 .

[23]  A. Johansson,et al.  Public advisory services - theory and practice , 2003 .

[24]  J. Woiceshyn.  The Strategic Management of Innovation. A Sociological and Economic Theory , 2003 .

[25]  Marie-Christine Monnoyer,et al.  Understanding the relationship between services and innovation: the RESER review of the European service literature on innovation, 2002 , 2004 .

[26]  P. Robinson,et al.  Competing in the global economy - the innovation challenge , 2004 .

[27]  Marja Toivonen,et al.  Expertise as business : long-term development and future prospects of knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) , 2004 .

[28]  M. Hales.  Birds were Dinosaurs Once - the Diversity and Evolution of Research and Technology Organisations , 2004 .

[29]  J. Bryson,et al.  Combinational and dislocated knowledge and the norwegian client-consultant relationship , 2004 .

[30]  Jari Kolehmainen.  Knowledge institutions in the local innovation environment : case digital media agglomeration in Tampere , 2005 .

[31]  Robert J. Bennett,et al.  The benefits of external support to SMEs: “Hard” versus “soft” outcomes and satisfaction levels , 2005 .

[32]  Otto Toivanen,et al.  Do financial constraints hold back innovation and growth?: Evidence on the role of public policy , 2005 .

[33]  R. Boschma,et al.  Economic policy from an evolutionary perspective: the case of Finland , 2007 .

[34]  Luke Georghiou,et al.  Creating an Innovative Europe: report of the independent expert group on R&D and innovation , 2006 .

[35]  M. Freel,et al.  Patterns of Technological Innovation in Knowledge‐Intensive Business Services , 2006 .

[36]  Peter R H Wood.  Urban Development and Knowledge-Intensive Business Services: Too Many Unanswered Questions? , 2006 .

[37]  Jeremy Howells.  Outsourcing for Innovation: Systems of Innovation and the Role of Knowledge Intermediaries , 2006 .

[38]  Richard J. Gilbert,et al.  Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where Are We in the Competition--Innovation Debate? , 2006, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[39]  L. Georghiou,et al.  Public procurement and innovation?Resurrecting the demand side , 2007 .

[40]  Francisco Mas-Verdú,et al.  Services and innovation systems: European models of Technology Centres , 2007 .

[41]  Arne Isaksen,et al.  Knowledge Intensive Business Services and Urban Industrial Development , 2007 .

[42]  E. Autio,et al.  High-Growth SME Support Initiatives in Nine Countries: Analysis, Categorization, and Recommendations , 2007 .

[43]  Markku Sotarauta,et al.  Co-evolution of the Finnish National and Local Innovation and Science Arenas: Towards a Dynamic Understanding of Multi-level Governance , 2007 .