Adaptations to increasing hydraulic stress: morphology, hydrodynamics and fitness of two higher aquatic plant species.

Sessile organisms often exhibit morphological changes in response to permanent exposure to mechanical stimulation (wind or water movements). The adaptive value of these morphological changes (hydrodynamic performance and consequences on fitness) has not been studied extensively, particularly for higher plants submitted to flow stress. The aim was to determine the adaptive value of morphological patterns observed within two higher aquatic plant species, Berula erecta and Mentha aquatica, growing along a natural flow stress gradient. The hydrodynamic ability of each ramet was investigated through quantitative variables (drag coefficient and E-value). Fitness-related traits based on vegetative growth and clonal multiplication were assessed for each individual. For both species, the drag coefficient and the E-value were explained only to a limited extent by the morphological traits used. B. erecta exhibited a reduction in size and low overall plant drag at higher flow velocities, despite high drag values relative to leaf area, due to a low flexibility. The plants maintained their fitness, at least in part, through biomass reallocation: one tall ramet at low velocity, but shorter individuals with many interconnected stolons when flow velocity increased. For M. aquatica, morphological differences along the velocity gradient did not lead to greater hydrodynamic performance. Plant size increased with increasing velocities, suggesting the indirect effects of current favouring growth in high velocities. The fitness-related traits did not demonstrate lower plant fitness for high velocities. Different developmental constraints linked to plant morphology and trade-offs between major plant functions probably lead to different plant responses to flow stress.

[1]  Steven Vogel,et al.  Drag and Flexibility in Sessile Organisms , 1984 .

[2]  E. C. Bell.  Applying flow tank measurements to the surf zone: Predicting dislodgment of the Gigartinaceae , 1999 .

[3]  M. Poulson,et al.  Morphological adaptations and photosynthetic rates of amphibious Veronica anagallis-aquatica L. (Scrophulariaceae) under different flow regimes , 2003 .

[4]  C. Blanchette.  SIZE AND SURVIVAL OF INTERTIDAL PLANTS IN RESPONSE TO WAVE ACTION: A CASE STUDY WITH FUCUS GARDNERI , 1997 .

[5]  M. Jaffe.  Thigmomorphogenesis: The response of plant growth and development to mechanical stimulation , 1973, Planta.

[6]  R. G. Sheath,et al.  MECHANICAL ADAPTATIONS TO FLOW IN FRESHWATER RED ALGAE 1 , 1988 .

[7]  Randall S. Alberte,et al.  Flow, flapping, and photosynthesis ofNereocystis leutkeana: a functional comparison of undulate and flat blade morphologies , 1988 .

[8]  A. Green,et al.  PLANT PERFORMANCE ACROSS LATITUDE: THE ROLE OF PLASTICITY AND LOCAL ADAPTATION IN AN AQUATIC PLANT , 2003 .

[9]  G. van der Velde,et al.  Effects of waves on helophyte stands: mechanical characteristics of stems of Phragmites australis and Scirpus lacustris , 1996 .

[10]  T. Hung.  Life in Moving Fluids—The physical biology of flow , 1988 .

[11]  E. Garnier,et al.  Leaf anatomy, specific mass and water content in congeneric annual and perennial grass species , 1994 .

[12]  S. Dudgeon,et al.  Thick vs. thin: thallus morphology and tissue mechanics influence differential drag and dislodgement of two co-dominant seaweeds , 1992 .

[13]  J. Schutten,et al.  Predicting the hydraulic forces on submerged macrophytes from current velocity, biomass and morphology , 2000, Oecologia.

[14]  S. L. Armstrong.  The behavior in flow of the morphologically variable seaweed Hedophyllum sessile (C. Ag.) Setchell , 1989, Hydrobiologia.

[15]  F. Yu,et al.  Plasticity in R/S ratio, morphology and fitness-related traits in response to reciprocal patchiness of light and nutrients in the stoloniferous herb, Glechoma longituba L , 2003 .

[16]  S. Sultan.  Evolutionary Implications of Phenotypic Plasticity in Plants , 1987 .

[17]  M. Trémolières,et al.  Aquatic macrophyte communities as bioindicators of eutrophication in calcareous oligosaprobe stream waters (Upper Rhine plain, Alsace) , 1990, Vegetatio.

[18]  R. Alexander,et al.  Ecological morphology : integrative organismal biology , 1995 .

[19]  F. Telewski,et al.  Thigmomorphogenesis: field and laboratory studies of Abies fraseri in response to wind or mechanical perturbation. , 1986, Physiologia plantarum.

[20]  V. Debat,et al.  Mapping phenotypes: canalization, plasticity and developmental stability , 2001 .

[21]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  Morphology, Performance and Fitness , 1983 .

[22]  James R. Usherwood,et al.  Mechanical and anatomical adaptations in terrestrial and aquatic buttercups to their respective environments , 1997 .

[23]  P. Reich,et al.  A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2003 .

[24]  S. Sultan.  Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history. , 2000, Trends in plant science.

[25]  A. Elger,et al.  Comparison of three life-history traits of invasive Elodea canadensis Michx. and Elodea nuttallii (Planch.) H. St. John , 2002 .

[26]  R. Morel,et al.  Shifts in drag and swimming potential during grayling ontogenesis: relations with habitat use , 2000 .

[27]  R. Keith,et al.  A Handbook , 2006 .

[28]  L. Santamaría,et al.  Clonal variation in morphological and physiological responses to irradiance and photoperiod for the aquatic angiosperm Potamogeton pectinatus , 2002 .

[29]  M Denny,et al.  Are there mechanical limits to size in wave-swept organisms? , 1985, The Journal of experimental biology.

[30]  E. Carrington.  Drag and dislodgment of an intertidal macroalga: consequences of morphological variation in Mastocarpus papillatus Kützing , 1990 .

[31]  L. Kautsky,et al.  Plastic responses in morphology of Potamogeton pectinatus L. to sediment and above-sediment conditions at two sites in the northern Baltic proper , 1995 .

[32]  M. Koehl,et al.  The Interaction of Moving Water and Sessile Organisms , 1982 .

[33]  M. A. R. Koehl,et al.  Effects of Sea Anemones on the Flow Forces They Encounter , 1977 .

[34]  Mark R. Patterson.  Role of Mechanical Loading in Growth of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) Seedlings , 1992 .

[35]  Evon M. O. Abu-Taieh,et al.  Comparative Study , 2020, Definitions.

[36]  M. C. Pratt,et al.  Strength, drag, and dislodgment of two competing intertidal algae from two wave exposures and four seasons , 2002 .

[37]  A. R. Ennos,et al.  A comparative study of the response of the roots and shoots of sunflower and maize to mechanical stimulation , 1996 .

[38]  B. Statzner,et al.  Silk‐producing stream insects and gravel erosion: Significant biological effects on critical shear stress , 1999 .

[39]  V. Pyankov,et al.  Leaf structure and specific leaf mass: the alpine desert plants of the Eastern Pamirs, Tadjikistan , 1999 .

[40]  M. A. R. Koehl,et al.  WHEN DOES MORPHOLOGY MATTER , 1996 .

[41]  A. R. Ennos,et al.  Mechanical differences between free-standing and supported wheat plants, Triticum aestivum L , 1996 .

[42]  T. Speck,et al.  Hydrodynamics and Biomechanics of the Submerged Water Moss Fontinalis antipyretica ‐ a Comparison of Specimens from Habitats with Different Flow Velocities , 1998 .

[43]  P. Chambers,et al.  The interaction between water movement, sediment dynamics and submersed macrophytes , 2001, Hydrobiologia.

[44]  Mark W. Denny,et al.  Mechanical Consequences of Size in Wave‐Swept Algae , 1994 .

[45]  D. F. Westlake.  Some Effects of Low-velocity Currents on the Metabolism of Aquatic Macrophytes , 1967 .

[46]  K. Sand‐Jensen,et al.  Drag and reconfiguration of freshwater macrophytes , 2003 .

[47]  Robert A. Smith,et al.  EFFECT OF CURRENT VELOCITY ON THE DETACHMENT OF THALLI OF ULVA LACTUCA (CHLOROPHYTA) IN A NEW ZEALAND ESTUARY , 1995 .

[48]  T. V. Madsen,et al.  The effects of current velocity on the photosynthesis of Callitriche stagnalis scop. , 1983 .

[49]  S. Vogel.  Drag and Reconfiguration of Broad Leaves in High Winds , 1989 .

[50]  S. Puijalon,et al.  Morphological variation of two taxonomically distant plant species along a natural flow velocity gradient. , 2004, The New phytologist.