Searching through the hierarchy: How level of target categorization affects visual search

Does the same basic-level advantage commonly observed in the categorization literature also hold for targets in a search task? We answered this question by first conducting a category verification task to define a set of categories showing a standard basic-level advantage, which we then used as stimuli in a search experiment. Participants were cued with a picture preview of the target or its category name at either superordinate, basic, or subordinate levels, then shown a target-present/absent search display. Although search guidance and target verification was best using pictorial cues, the effectiveness of the categorical cues depended on the hierarchical level. Search guidance was best for the specific subordinate-level cues, whereas target verification showed a standard basic-level advantage. These findings demonstrate different hierarchical advantages for guidance and verification in categorical search. We interpret these results as evidence for a common target representation underlying categorical search guidance and verification.

[1]  Gregory J. Zelinsky,et al.  Visual search guidance is best after a short delay , 2011, Vision Research.

[2]  Gregory J. Zelinsky,et al.  Visual search is guided to categorically-defined targets , 2009, Vision Research.

[3]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Typicality aids search for an unspecified target, but only in identification and not in attentional guidance , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Naomi M. Kenner,et al.  How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search , 2004, Vision Research.

[5]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Visual search and the collapse of categorization. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  G. Zelinsky,et al.  Short article: Search guidance is proportional to the categorical specificity of a target cue , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Michael L. Mack,et al.  The Timing of Visual Object Categorization , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[8]  G. Murphy,et al.  The Big Book of Concepts , 2002 .

[9]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  T. Foulsham,et al.  How Does the Purpose of Inspection Influence the Potency of Visual Salience in Scene Perception? , 2007, Perception.

[11]  Xin Chen,et al.  Real-world visual search is dominated by top-down guidance , 2006, Vision Research.

[12]  Kathy E. Johnson,et al.  Effects of varying levels of expertise on the basic level of categorization. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  H. Brownell,et al.  Category differentiation in object recognition: typicality constraints on the basic category advantage. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[15]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  George L. Malcolm,et al.  The effects of target template specificity on visual search in real-world scenes: evidence from eye movements. , 2009, Journal of vision.